Sistema integrado para toma de decisiones en el diseño de estructuras de hormigón

This paper presents a methodology to analyze decisions in the design of concrete structures. Specifically, we propose a multi-criteria approach to assess the value implications of precast concrete technologies versus in-situ concrete solutions. First, we emphasize the importance of careful decision-making in early stages of construction projects to enhance customer value. Second, we present a decisionmaking methodology that uses fuzzy logic to represent and synthesize information about risk-return tradeoffs in the different kinds of variables involved in the evaluation of a project’s value. To illustrate, we use our methodology to analyze precast vs. in-situ solutions in the design of drainage structures. The results of our analysis point at precast solutions as the most desirable design choice in this setting, and highlight the importance of value analysis in early stages of construction projects.

[1]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[2]  Eric T. T. Wong,et al.  A fuzzy stochastic technique for project selection , 2000 .

[3]  A. Aguado,et al.  Value Rate in Highway Cross-Sections During Its Life Cycle , 2014 .

[4]  Gaizka Ormazabal,et al.  Enhancing Value in Crucial Decisions: Line 9 of the Barcelona Subway , 2008 .

[5]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[6]  Geoffrey Hewland Hutton,et al.  Value in building , 1973 .

[7]  Alfredo del Caño,et al.  Sustainability Assessment of Concrete Structures within the Spanish Structural Concrete Code , 2012 .

[8]  Rafael de Heredia Scasso Dirección integrada de proyectos: "project management" , 1985 .

[9]  Gul Polat,et al.  Factors Affecting the Use of Precast Concrete Systems in the United States , 2008 .

[10]  Julián Salas Serrano De los sistemas de prefabricación cerrada a la industrialización sutil de la edifi cación: algunas claves del cambio tecnológico , 2008 .

[11]  Oleg Kapliński,et al.  Game theory applications in construction engineering and management , 2010 .

[12]  D. Ellsberg Classic and Current Notions of “Measurable Utility” , 1954 .

[13]  Simon A. Austin,et al.  Applying a Universal Content and Structure of Values in Construction Management , 2009 .

[14]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Overview of the application of "fuzzy techniques" in construction management research , 2009 .

[15]  Chang-Taek Hyun,et al.  A Study on the Development of a Cost Model Based on the Owner's Decision Making at the Early Stages of a Construction Project , 2010 .

[16]  D. Ellsberg Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[17]  Josefa Mula,et al.  Capacity and material requirement planning modelling by comparing deterministic and fuzzy models , 2008 .

[18]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Attitude-Based Strategic Negotiation for Conflict Management in Construction Projects , 2010 .

[19]  Núria Agell,et al.  Multiple-Criteria Evaluation for Value Management in Civil Engineering , 2005 .

[20]  H. Simon Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations , 1978 .

[21]  Gürsel A. Süer,et al.  Construction Project Scheduling with Time, Cost, and Material Restrictions Using Fuzzy Mathematical Models and Critical Path Method , 2009 .

[22]  Ghang Lee,et al.  Process Model Perspectives on Management and Engineering Procedures in the Precast'Prestressed Concrete Industry , 2004 .

[23]  Chi Sun Poon,et al.  Sustainable construction aspects of using prefabrication in dense urban environment: a Hong Kong case study , 2008 .

[24]  Felipe Pich-Aguilera,et al.  La arquitectura residencial como una realidad industrial. Tres ejemplos recientes , 2008 .

[25]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[26]  Martin Rogers,et al.  Using Electre III to aid the choice of housing construction process within structural engineering , 2000 .

[27]  Ashraf Elazouni,et al.  D-sub : Decision support system for subcontracting construction works , 2000 .

[28]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[29]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives , 1993 .

[30]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[31]  Kamal M. Al‐Subhi Al‐Harbi,et al.  Application of the AHP in project management , 2001 .

[32]  M. Allais Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque : critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine , 1953 .

[33]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Multiple criteria construction management decisions considering relations between criteria , 2010 .

[34]  Gaizka Ormazábal Sánchez El IDS: Un nuevo sistema integrado de toma de decisiones para la gestión de projectos constructivos , 2002 .