The Luminosities, Sizes, and Velocity Dispersions of Brightest Cluster Galaxies: Implications for Formation History

The size-luminosity relation of early-type brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs), Re ∝ L0.88, is steeper than that for the bulk of the early-type galaxy population, for which Re ∝ L0.68. This is true if quantities derived from either de Vaucouleurs or Sérsic fits to the surface brightness profiles are used. Contamination from an intracluster light component centered on the BCG, with parameters similar to what has been seen in some recent studies, is not able to account for this difference. In addition, although BCGs are hardly offset from the fundamental plane defined by the bulk of the early-type population, they show considerably smaller scatter. The larger than expected sizes of BCGs, and the increased homogeneity, are qualitatively consistent with models that seek to explain the colors of the most massive galaxies by invoking dry dissipationless mergers, since dissipation tends to reduce the sizes of galaxies, and wet mergers that result in star formation would tend to increase the scatter in luminosity at a fixed size and velocity dispersion. Furthermore, BCGs define the same g - r color-magnitude relation as the bulk of the early-type population. If BCGs formed from dry mergers, then BCG progenitors must have been red for their magnitudes, suggesting that they hosted older stellar populations than is typical for their luminosities. Our findings have two other consequences. First, the Re-L relation of the early-type galaxy population as a whole (i.e., normal plus BCG) exhibits some curvature: the most luminous galaxies tend to have larger sizes than is expected from the Re ∝ L0.68 scaling—some of this curvature must be a consequence of the fact that an increasing fraction of the most luminous galaxies are BCGs. The second consequence is suggested by the fact that, despite following a steeper size-luminosity relation, BCGs tend to define a tight relation between dynamical mass Reσ2/G and luminosity. Although this relation is slightly different than that defined by the bulk of the population, the fact that their sizes are large for their luminosities suggests that their velocity dispersions are small. We find that, indeed, BCGs define a shallower σ-L relation than the bulk of the early-type galaxy population. This shallower relation suggests that there may be a curvature in the correlation between black hole mass and velocity dispersion; simple extrapolation of a single power law M•-σ relation to large σ will underestimate M•.

[1]  J. Tonry,et al.  A Fundamental Relation between Compact Stellar Nuclei, Supermassive Black Holes, and Their Host Galaxies , 2006, astro-ph/0603840.

[2]  A. Dekel,et al.  The dissipative merger progenitors of elliptical galaxies , 2006, astro-ph/0603497.

[3]  J. Tonry,et al.  The ACS Virgo Cluster Survey. VI. Isophotal Analysis and the Structure of Early-Type Galaxies , 2006, astro-ph/0602297.

[4]  E. Cypriano,et al.  Shrinking of Cluster Ellipticals: A Tidal Stripping Explanation and Implications for the Intracluster Light , 2006, astro-ph/0602019.

[5]  E. Quataert,et al.  Red mergers and the assembly of massive elliptical galaxies: the fundamental plane and its projections , 2006, astro-ph/0601400.

[6]  A. Connolly,et al.  The luminosity‐weighted or ‘marked’ correlation function , 2005, astro-ph/0512463.

[7]  Y. Loh,et al.  The bright end of the luminosity function of red sequence galaxies , 2005, astro-ph/0510500.

[8]  G. Kauffmann,et al.  The formation history of elliptical galaxies , 2005, astro-ph/0509725.

[9]  G. Kauffmann,et al.  The many lives of active galactic nuclei: cooling flows, black holes and the luminosities and colour , 2005, astro-ph/0508046.

[10]  P. Hopkins,et al.  A Unified, Merger-driven Model of the Origin of Starbursts, Quasars, the Cosmic X-Ray Background, Supermassive Black Holes, and Galaxy Spheroids , 2005, astro-ph/0506398.

[11]  Volker Springel,et al.  The Many lives of AGN: Cooling flows, black holes and the luminosities and colours of galaxies , 2006, astro-ph/0602065.

[12]  Oxford,et al.  Breaking the hierarchy of galaxy formation , 2005, astro-ph/0511338.

[13]  P. Hopkins,et al.  The Fundamental Scaling Relations of Elliptical Galaxies , 2005, astro-ph/0511053.

[14]  Institute for Astronomy,et al.  Environmental dependence of the structure of brightest cluster galaxies , 2005, astro-ph/0510065.

[15]  P. Dokkum,et al.  The Recent and Continuing Assembly of Field Elliptical Galaxies by Red Mergers , 2005, astro-ph/0506661.

[16]  J. Peacock,et al.  Simulations of the formation, evolution and clustering of galaxies and quasars , 2005, Nature.

[17]  R. Nichol,et al.  The C4 Clustering Algorithm: Clusters of Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2005, astro-ph/0503713.

[18]  S. White,et al.  Intergalactic stars in z∼ 0.25 galaxy clusters: systematic properties from stacking of Sloan Digital Sky Survey imaging data , 2005, astro-ph/0501194.

[19]  R. Nichol,et al.  Colors, Magnitudes, and Velocity Dispersions in Early-Type Galaxies: Implications for Galaxy Ages and Metallicities , 2004, astro-ph/0409571.

[20]  D. Eisenstein,et al.  Interpreting the Relationship between Galaxy Luminosity, Color, and Environment , 2004, astro-ph/0406633.

[21]  D. Zaritsky,et al.  Intracluster Light in Nearby Galaxy Clusters: Relationship to the Halos of Brightest Cluster Galaxies , 2004, astro-ph/0406244.

[22]  R. Bernstein,et al.  Diffuse Optical Light in Galaxy Clusters. I. Abell 3888 , 2004, astro-ph/0509609.

[23]  R. Nichol,et al.  Early-Type Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. I. The Sample , 2003 .

[24]  P. Londrillo,et al.  Galaxy merging, the fundamental plane of elliptical galaxies and the MBH-σ0 relation , 2003, astro-ph/0302423.

[25]  R. Nichol,et al.  Early-Type Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. III. The Fundamental Plane , 2003, astro-ph/0301626.

[26]  R. Sheth,et al.  Halo Models of Large Scale Structure , 2002, astro-ph/0206508.

[27]  S. Tremaine,et al.  The Slope of the Black Hole Mass versus Velocity Dispersion Correlation , 2002, astro-ph/0203468.

[28]  Ralf Bender,et al.  A Relationship between Nuclear Black Hole Mass and Galaxy Velocity Dispersion , 2000, astro-ph/0006289.

[29]  D. Merritt,et al.  A Fundamental Relation between Supermassive Black Holes and Their Host Galaxies , 2000, astro-ph/0006053.

[30]  Institute for Astronomy,et al.  The ROSAT Brightest Cluster Sample — III. Optical spectra of the central cluster galaxies , 1999, astro-ph/9903057.

[31]  S. Tremaine,et al.  The Demography of Massive Dark Objects in Galaxy Centers , 1997, astro-ph/9708072.

[32]  R. Carlberg,et al.  Mergers of Dissipationless Systems: Clues about the Fundamental Plane , 1995 .

[33]  T. Lauer,et al.  Brightest cluster galaxies as standard candles , 1995 .

[34]  W. Oegerle,et al.  Fundamental Parameters of Brightest Cluster Galaxies , 1991 .

[35]  J. Kormendy Did elliptical galaxies form by mergers or by dissipative collapse , 1989 .

[36]  J. Schombert The structure of brightest cluster members. III: cD envelopes , 1988 .

[37]  W. Oegerle,et al.  The Surface Brightness--Effective Size Relation for Elliptical Galaxies in the Cores of Clusters , 1987 .

[38]  J. Schombert The structure of brightest cluster members. II - Mergers , 1987 .

[39]  R. Kirshner,et al.  Dynamics of luminous galaxies. II. Surface photometry and velocity dispersions of brightest cluster members. , 1985 .

[40]  J. Barrow,et al.  First ranked galaxies in groups and clusters , 1985 .

[41]  R. Kirshner,et al.  Dynamics of luminous galaxies , 1981 .

[42]  T. Thuan,et al.  The structure of giant elliptical galaxies in poor clusters of galaxies. , 1981 .

[43]  S. Tremaine,et al.  A test of a statistical model for the luminosities of bright cluster galaxies , 1977 .

[44]  P. Schechter,et al.  On the Significance of the Luminosities of First-Ranked Members of Sparse Groups of Galaxies , 1976 .

[45]  A. Sandage The Absolute Magnitude of First-Ranked Cluster Galaxies as a Function of Cluster Richness , 1976 .