A complex relationship: Older people and in-car message systems

The motivations and preferences of different user groups are important when designing for all and accessibility, in the sense of access to computer systems, is only one aspect of the enterprise. Ubiquitous computing by its very nature is difficult to evaluate in a laboratory setting and if an application is safety critical it is also difficult to evaluate in a real life scenario. This paper examines the part that context plays in the evaluation of a speech-based in-car messaging system when tested with older adults. The results show that older people are significantly influenced by the context in which evaluation takes place and in fact produced different evaluations of speech messages when heard on a laptop compared with within a simulated driving scenario. Younger people were far more consistent in their evaluation under both conditions, and less influenced by the change in context. These results reveal the complexity entailed when designing for all with in-car speech systems which include older people, and point to the need for extra care when testing ubiquitous computer systems for older people.

[1]  Louise Dulude,et al.  Automated telephone answering systems and aging , 2002, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[2]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Improving automotive safety by pairing driver emotion and car voice emotion , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[3]  Gilbert Cockton,et al.  A development framework for value-centred design , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[4]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Thank you, I did not see that: in-car speech based information systems for older adults , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[5]  E. Rogers,et al.  HOMOPHILY-HETEROPHILY: RELATIONAL CONCEPTS FOR COMMUNICATION RESEARCH , 1970 .

[6]  Peter Gregor,et al.  “User sensitive inclusive design”— in search of a new paradigm , 2000, CUU '00.

[7]  Mary Corbett,et al.  Effective Methodology for the Study of HCI , 1990 .

[8]  Mary Zajicek,et al.  Towards VoiceXML Dialogue Design for Older Adults , 2004 .

[9]  K. Rosenbloom,et al.  Disability discrimination act , 1996, In Practice.

[10]  H. Sypher,et al.  Communication Research Measures: A Sourcebook , 1994 .

[11]  Peter Gregor,et al.  Issues surrounding the user-centred development of a new interactive memory aid , 2003, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[12]  James B. Lemert,et al.  DIMENSIONS FOR EVALUATING THE ACCEPTABILITY OF MESSAGE SOURCES , 1969 .

[13]  Mary Zajicek,et al.  Solutions for Elderly Visually Impaired People Using the Internet , 2000, BCS HCI.

[14]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Don't blame me I am only the driver: impact of blame attribution on attitudes and attention to driving task , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[15]  Mary Zajicek,et al.  Speech Output for Older Visually Impaired Adults , 2001, BCS HCI/IHM.

[16]  C. Nass,et al.  Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction. , 2001 .

[17]  Oli Mival,et al.  Mutual inspiration in the development of new technology for older people. , 2003 .

[18]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The Effects of Emotion of Voice in Synthesized and Recorded Speech , 2001 .

[19]  D. Hawthorn,et al.  Possible implications of aging for interface designers , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[20]  Paul F. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Mass communication popular taste and organized social action. , 1948 .