Face recognition: a model specific ability

In our everyday lives, we view it as a matter of course that different people are good at different things. It can be surprising, in this context, to learn that most of what is known about cognitive ability variation across individuals concerns the broadest of all cognitive abilities; an ability referred to as general intelligence, general mental ability, or just g. In contrast, our knowledge of specific abilities, those that correlate little with g, is severely constrained. Here, we draw upon our experience investigating an exceptionally specific ability, face recognition, to make the case that many specific abilities could easily have been missed. In making this case, we derive key insights from earlier false starts in the measurement of face recognition’s variation across individuals, and we highlight the convergence of factors that enabled the recent discovery that this variation is specific. We propose that the case of face recognition ability illustrates a set of tools and perspectives that could accelerate fruitful work on specific cognitive abilities. By revealing relatively independent dimensions of human ability, such work would enhance our capacity to understand the uniqueness of individual minds.

[1]  R. Plomin Behavioral genetics. , 1991, Research publications - Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease.

[2]  I. Deary,et al.  The neuroscience of human intelligence differences , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  H. Gardner Multiple intelligences : new horizons , 2006 .

[4]  R. Bonney,et al.  Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy , 2009 .

[5]  N. Kanwisher Functional specificity in the human brain: A window into the functional architecture of the mind , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Human face recognition ability is specific and highly heritable , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  R. L. Thorndike,et al.  Factor analysis of social and abstract intelligence. , 1936 .

[9]  Sigal G. Barsade,et al.  Human abilities: emotional intelligence. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  D. Goleman,et al.  Social Intelligence , 2006 .

[11]  J. Sergent,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  Kerry Hart Multiple Intelligences , 1999 .

[13]  W. Newsome,et al.  A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT) , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  Emrah Düzel,et al.  A new selective developmental deficit: Impaired object recognition with normal face recognition , 2011, Cortex.

[16]  Intelligence , 1836, The Medico-chirurgical review.

[17]  J. Wilmer How to use individual differences to isolate functional organization, biology, and utility of visual functions; with illustrative proposals for stereopsis. , 2008, Spatial Vision.

[18]  David Wechsler,et al.  Wechsler Memory scale. , 2005 .

[19]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  W. Sommer,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Individual Differences in Perceiving and Recognizing Faces — One Element of Social Cognition , 2010 .

[21]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Two Distinct Visual Motion Mechanisms for Smooth Pursuit: Evidence from Individual Differences , 2007, Neuron.

[22]  G. Yovel,et al.  Diagnosing prosopagnosia: Effects of ageing, sex, and participant–stimulus ethnic match on the Cambridge Face Memory Test and Cambridge Face Perception Test , 2009, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[23]  张静,et al.  Banana Ovate family protein MaOFP1 and MADS-box protein MuMADS1 antagonistically regulated banana fruit ripening , 2015 .

[24]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Capturing specific abilities as a window into human individuality: The example of face recognition , 2012, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[25]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Where cognitive development and aging meet: Face learning ability peaks after age 30 , 2011, Cognition.

[26]  Bruce Edmonds,et al.  Social Intelligence , 1999, Computational and mathematical organization theory.

[27]  J. Ricker,et al.  Confirmatory factor analysis of the Wechsler Memory Scale-III. , 1999, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[28]  Michael C. Pyryt Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies , 1998 .

[29]  E. McKone,et al.  Individual Differences in the Ability to Recognise Facial Identity Are Associated with Social Anxiety , 2011, PloS one.

[30]  E. Walker,et al.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 2013 .

[31]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  D. Wechsler,et al.  Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) , 2010 .

[33]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[34]  M. Carter Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. , 2014 .

[35]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. , 1996 .

[36]  L. Cosmides From : The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1995 .

[37]  D. Delis,et al.  Parsing the Recognition Memory Components of the WMS-III Face Memory Subtest: Normative Data and Clinical Findings in Dementia Groups , 2004, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[38]  Olivier Desrichard,et al.  Are memory self-efficacy and memory performance related? A meta-analysis. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  John F. Kihlstrom,et al.  Handbook of Intelligence: Social Intelligence , 2000 .

[40]  Wm. R. Wright General Intelligence, Objectively Determined and Measured. , 1905 .

[41]  E. Peterson,et al.  The Eyes Test as a Measure of Individual Differences: How much of the Variance Reflects Verbal IQ? , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[42]  W. Sommer,et al.  On the specificity of face cognition compared with general cognitive functioning across adult age. , 2011, Psychology and aging.

[43]  Anthony E. Richardson,et al.  Spatial abilities at different scales: Individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning , 2006 .

[44]  R. Gunderman,et al.  Emotional intelligence. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[45]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Is the Web as good as the lab? Comparable performance from Web and lab in cognitive/perceptual experiments , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[46]  A. Jensen,et al.  The g factor , 1996, Nature.

[47]  Robert Plomin,et al.  Generalist genes: implications for the cognitive sciences , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  Janet B W Williams,et al.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 2013 .

[49]  Jessica L. Irons,et al.  New Tests to Measure Individual Differences in Matching and Labelling Facial Expressions of Emotion, and Their Association with Ability to Recognise Vocal Emotions and Facial Identity , 2013, PloS one.

[50]  T. Hunt,et al.  The measurement of social intelligence. , 1928 .

[51]  R. L. Thorndike,et al.  An evaluation of the attempts to measure social intelligence. , 1937 .

[52]  Rankin W. McGugin,et al.  The Vanderbilt Expertise Test reveals domain-general and domain-specific sex effects in object recognition , 2012, Vision Research.

[53]  F. Schmidt,et al.  General mental ability in the world of work: occupational attainment and job performance. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  R. Saxe Uniquely human social cognition , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.