Controlling and combining resources in networks — from Uppsala to Stanford, and back again: The case of a biotech innovation

Abstract This paper explores how resources are controlled and combined in a biotech network that spans from Uppsala, Sweden, to Stanford, USA. A case study is reported that describes and analyses how the original discovery, developed at the Department of Genetics and Pathology at Uppsala University, Sweden, was combined with other innovations at Stanford University, California, and under the influence and control of several different actors, including venture capitalists, were exploited within a newly founded company, ParAllele. The paper analyzes the resources that are created, combined and controlled in the network around these scientific discoveries and the company hosting them. This analysis shows how actors are using and are exposed to different control mechanisms, such as action, results and personnel controls, in the innovation process. Our discussion emphasizes how the involved actors apply various types of controls on resources in order to reach their objectives. Forms of control that both entail mobilizing other actors and preventing actions in the emerging network are of importance. We conclude the paper by pointing out the features of control in innovation processes as well as obstacles to control in a business network setting.

[1]  S. Johansson,et al.  Accounting Theory: Integrating Behaviour and Measurement , 1995 .

[2]  Cyril Tomkins,et al.  Interdependencies, trust and information in relationships, alliances and networks , 2001 .

[3]  Antonio Dávila,et al.  Venture capital financing and the growth of startup firms , 2003 .

[4]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[5]  Torkel Wedin,et al.  Networks and Demand. The Use of Electricity in an Industrial Process , 2001 .

[6]  Geoff Easton,et al.  Industrial Networks: A New View of Reality , 1992 .

[7]  A. Hopwood,et al.  Looking across rather than up and down: On the need to explore the lateral processing of information , 1996 .

[8]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Developing relationships in business networks , 1995 .

[9]  Jan Mouritsen,et al.  Inter-organizational controls and organizational competencies: episodes around target cost management/functional analysis and open book accounting , 2001 .

[10]  Håkan Håkansson,et al.  Industrial technological development : a network approach , 1987 .

[11]  Johnny Lind,et al.  When do firms use different types of customer accounting , 2006 .

[12]  M. Abernethy,et al.  Management control systems in research and development organizations: The role of accounting, behavior and personnel controls , 1997 .

[13]  U Landegren,et al.  Padlock probes: circularizing oligonucleotides for localized DNA detection. , 1994, Science.

[14]  R. Westrum The Social Construction of Technological Systems , 1989 .

[15]  Enrico Baraldi,et al.  Embedding, Producing and Using Low Weight : Value Creation and the Role of the Configuration of Resource Interfaces in the Networks around Holmen’s Newsprint and IKEA’s Lack Table , 2006 .

[16]  D. Otley,et al.  Accounting for Management Control , 1990 .

[17]  Anthony J. Berry,et al.  Control, organisation and accounting , 1980 .

[18]  K. Merchant Control in business organizations , 1987 .

[19]  Sof Thrane,et al.  The complexity of management accounting change: Bifurcation and oscillation in schizophrenic inter-organisational systems , 2007 .

[20]  Håkan Håkansson,et al.  Accounting and network coordination , 2004 .

[21]  D. Otley,et al.  The effects of the interactive use of management control systems on product innovation , 2004 .

[22]  M. Granlund,et al.  Management control and controllership in new economy firms—a life cycle perspective , 2005 .

[23]  H. Håkansson,et al.  A Model of Industrial Networks , 1992 .

[24]  Tony Davila An exploratory study on the emergence of management control systems: formalizing human resources in small growing firms , 2005 .

[25]  Henri C. Dekker,et al.  Control of inter-organizational relationships: evidence on appropriation concerns and coordination requirements , 2004 .

[26]  Alexandra Waluszewski,et al.  Knowledge and innovation in business and industry : the importance of using others , 2007 .

[27]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[28]  Raghu Garud,et al.  The innovation journey , 1999 .