Hydrogeological interpretation and potential of the new magnetic resonance sounding, MRS, method

Abstract This study reviews the up-to-date hydrogeological contribution of the new, geophysical magnetic resonance sounding (MRS) method and presents new interpretation ideas and potential regarding various hydrogeological applications. The main advantage of the MRS method as compared to other geophysical methods is in its water selectivity. MRS is commercially available but is also the subject of R & D to minimize a number of limitations related not only to data acquisition but also to hydrogeological data interpretation. The two main MRS output data types are free water content ( Φ MRS ) and decay time constant ( T d ). Relations between Φ MRS and effective porosity, specific yield and specific storage are discussed in the framework of an original groundwater storage concept. T d is correlated empirically with hydraulic conductivity, however such correlation is not yet quantified for various rock types so T d has to be calibrated by borehole data. As an improvement of the data interpretation, a proposal of a new, multi-decay approach is presented. The advantage of such analysis is that it combines storage and flow property characteristics in assessing water content at various pore size fractions, and the disadvantage is that it is applicable only at large signal to noise ratios. Five case examples are used to show that combined interpretation of Φ MRS and T d can be used to evaluate subsurface hydrostratigraphy although such analysis is vulnerable to equivalence error and its resolution decreases with depth. MRS with large volume-averaging schema and current limitation to 1D approach is already suitable for groundwater modelling applications and for evaluation of groundwater potential in the MRS measurement scale (∼100×100 m 2 ) but is not yet optimized for well siting. MRS can detect water in the unsaturated zone, which can be potentially used in real time subsurface flux monitoring. Field experiments indicate that MRS is not appropriate for groundwater salinity detection. No field experiments have yet been made to detect hydrogenated compounds like hydrocarbons and tracers in the subsurface.

[1]  J. Galford,et al.  A New Characterization Of Bulk-volume Irreducible Using Magnetic Resonance , 1998 .

[2]  D. Bergman,et al.  Permeability relation with other petrophysical parameters for periodic porous media , 1999 .

[3]  D. V. Trushkin,et al.  The potential of a noise-reducing antenna for surface NMR groundwater surveys in the Earth's magnetic field , 1994 .

[4]  A. Timur,et al.  Pulsed Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of Porosity, Movable Fluid, and Permeability of Sandstones , 1969 .

[5]  Mark Goldman,et al.  Application of the integrated NMR-TDEM method in groundwater exploration in Israel , 1994 .

[6]  U. Yaramanci,et al.  Surface NMR within a geophysical study of an aquifer at Haldensleben (Germany) , 1999 .

[7]  Jean-Michel Baltassat,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance as a geophysical tool for hydrogeologists , 2002 .

[8]  Alex L. MacKay,et al.  THE USE OF NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE FOR STUDYING AND DETECTING HYDROCARBON CONTAMINANTS IN POROUS ROCKS , 1993 .

[9]  David R. Maidment,et al.  Handbook of Hydrology , 1993 .

[10]  Gunnar Brix,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of paramagnetic tracers in porous media: Quantification of flow and transport parameters , 1997 .

[11]  Ugur Yaramanci,et al.  Joint inversion of Surface Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Vertical Electrical Sounding , 2002 .

[12]  R. Niessner,et al.  Direct 3-D measurement of the flow velocity in porous media using magnetic resonance tomography. , 2000 .

[13]  W. E. Kenyon,et al.  Surface-to-volume ratio, charge density, nuclear magnetic relaxation, and permeability in clay-bearing sandstones , 1990 .

[14]  J. Roy,et al.  The magnetic resonance sounding technique and its use for groundwater investigations , 2003 .

[15]  D. V. Trushkin,et al.  Surface NMR applied to an electroconductive medium1 , 1995 .

[16]  O. Shushakov.  Groundwater NMR in conductive water , 1996 .

[17]  A. Legchenko,et al.  A new direct non-invasive groundwater detection technology for Australia , 1991 .

[18]  W. E. Kenyon,et al.  Determination of pore size distribution in sedimentary rocks by proton nuclear magnetic resonance , 1992 .

[19]  Jean-Michel Vouillamoz,et al.  Application of integrated magnetic resonance sounding and resistivity methods for borehole implementation : a case study in Cambodia , 2002 .

[20]  J. Roy,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Sounding: New Method for Ground Water Assessment , 2004, Ground water.

[21]  Anatoly Legchenko,et al.  Inversion of surface NMR data , 1998 .

[22]  M. Goldman,et al.  Detection of the water level in fractured phreatic aquifers using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) geophysical measurements , 1996 .

[23]  W. E. Kenyon,et al.  Petrophysical Principles of Applications of NMR Logging , 1997 .

[24]  A. Legchenko,et al.  Noninvasive NMR study of subsurface aquifers in France , 1995 .

[25]  R. Knight,et al.  Detecting sorbed hydrocarbons in a porous medium using proton nuclear magnetic resonance. , 2000 .

[26]  W. Kinzelbach,et al.  Observation of flow and transport processes in artificial porous media via magnetic resonance imaging in three dimensions , 1997 .

[27]  Ugur Yaramanci,et al.  Aquifer characterisation using Surface NMR jointly with other geophysical techniques at the Nauen/Berlin test site , 2002 .

[28]  David P Gallegos,et al.  A NMR technique for the analysis of pore structure: Determination of continuous pore size distributions , 1988 .