Validating new product creativity in the eastern context of Malaysia

This paper examines the etic vs. emic nature of the new product creativity (NPC) construct often used in the strategic marketing and management literatures. The current study compares the NPC measure developed by Im and Workman (2004) in the West in an Eastern context by utilizing data from 172 Malaysian companies. The results show that NPC, which is the combination of new product (NP) novelty and NP meaningfulness, has a different connotation in Malaysia. The findings demonstrate that from the novelty perspective NPC is an emic phenomenon. After the construct validation process, the Western claim that NPC is a seed of firm performance is tested. The results verify NPC's relationship with NP performance as a source of competitive advantage for Malaysian firms and thus suggest that this relationship is etic in nature. These findings have significant implications for firms' global innovation strategies.

[1]  M. Parry,et al.  The Determinants of Japanese New Product Successes , 1997 .

[2]  T. Amabile,et al.  The conditions of creativity. , 1988 .

[3]  T. Lubart.  Handbook of Creativity: Creativity Across Cultures , 1998 .

[4]  T. M. Amabile.  The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. , 1983 .

[5]  G. Hult,et al.  Competitive advantage in the global marketplace: a focus on marketing strategy , 2001 .

[6]  R. Hisrich,et al.  Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation , 2001 .

[7]  Susannah B. F. Paletz,et al.  Implicit Theories of Creativity Across Cultures , 2008 .

[8]  Soyoung Kim,et al.  Validating the retail service quality scale for US and Korean customers of discount stores: an exploratory study , 2002 .

[9]  J. P. Guilford,et al.  Varieties of Creative Giftedness, Their Measurement and Development , 1975 .

[10]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Creativity: The individual, the systems, the approach , 1988 .

[11]  K. Zhou,et al.  The Effects of Strategic Orientations on Technology- and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovations , 2005 .

[12]  J. Workman,et al.  Market Orientation, Creativity, and New Product Performance in High-Technology Firms , 2004 .

[13]  Daniel C. Smith,et al.  Cross-Functional Product Development Teams, Creativity, and the Innovativeness of New Consumer Products , 2001 .

[14]  Barry J. Babin,et al.  Materialism through the eyes of Polish and American consumers , 2011 .

[15]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[16]  Jie Yang,et al.  The contingency value of knowledge in new product creativity , 2007, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[17]  S. Lall.  Technology Policy and Competitiveness in Malaysia , 1999 .

[18]  Jie Yang,et al.  New product development: An innovation diffusion perspective , 2006 .

[19]  Gianfranco Walsh,et al.  Customer-based corporate reputation of a service firm: scale development and validation , 2007 .

[20]  Young-Won Ha,et al.  Antecedents and consequence of Korean and Japanese new product advantage , 2006 .

[21]  Nukhet Harmancioglu,et al.  Data equivalence in cross-cultural international business research: assessment and guidelines , 2008 .

[22]  Anna N. N. Hui,et al.  Creativity : when East meets West , 2004 .

[23]  M. Laroche.  Impact of culture on marketing strategy: Introduction to the special issue , 2009 .

[24]  S. Hunt,et al.  The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition , 1995 .

[25]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  Creativity in product innovation: Introduction: characterization and illustration of Creativity Templates , 2002 .

[26]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[27]  Gary A. Knight,et al.  Cross-cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm entrepreneurial orientation , 1997 .

[28]  George D. Deitz,et al.  MEASURING CROSS-NATIONAL INVARIANCE OF THE ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION SCALE , 2009 .

[29]  S. JomoK.,et al.  Technology, Competitiveness and the State: Malaysia's Industrial Technology Policies , 1999 .

[30]  Harry Nyström,et al.  Creativity and Innovation , 1979 .

[31]  Xiaodong Yue,et al.  Concepts of Creativity: Similarities and Differences among Mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwanese Chinese , 2000 .

[32]  Michael E. Raynor,et al.  Strategic Flexibility in R&D , 2004 .

[33]  Raymond P. M. Chow,et al.  Relationship marketing orientation: scale development and cross-cultural validation , 2005 .

[34]  Jerome S. Bruner,et al.  The conditions of creativity. , 1962 .

[35]  S. Hunt.  A General Theory of Competition: Resources, Competences, Productivity, Economic Growth , 1999 .

[36]  R. Chandy,et al.  Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize , 1998 .

[37]  R. Morgan,et al.  The moderating effect of organizational cohesiveness in knowledge use and new product development , 2006 .

[38]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[39]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[40]  Jie Yang,et al.  Turning knowledge into new product creativity: an empirical study , 2009, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[41]  J. Averill,et al.  Emotions and Creativity, East and West , 2001 .

[42]  R. Mayer.  Handbook of Creativity: Fifty Years of Creativity Research , 1998 .

[43]  K. Zhou.  Innovation, imitation, and new product performance: The case of China , 2006 .

[44]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Contemporary Studies on the Concept of Creativity: the East and the West , 2002 .

[45]  Robert T. Brown.  Creativity: What are we to measure? , 1989 .

[46]  R. Cooper,et al.  The Impact of Product Innovativeness on Performance , 1991 .

[47]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity , 1997 .