Evaluation Of The Grey-level Co-occurrence Matrix Method For Land-cover Classification Using Spot Imagery

Absfruct-Nine cover types have been classified using a textural/ spectral approach. The texture analysis is based on the grey-level cooccurrence matrix method. Texture features are created from a SPOT near-infrared image using four texture indices, seven window sizes, and two quantization levels. A supervised classification based on the maximum-likelihood algorithm is applied to the three SPOT multispectral bands combined with each texture image individually and to the three bands combined with all four texture images. Classification accuracy is measured by Kappa coefficients calculated from confusion matrices. A factor analysis, based on principal components, is performed to evaluate the contribution to the classification accuracy of each variable involved in the creation of the texture features. The addition of texture features provides a significant improvement in the classification accuracy of each cover type when compared with the results obtained from the multispectral analysis alone. The window size accounts for 90% of the classification variability, 7% is explained by the statistics used as texture measures, and only 3% by the quantization level. There is a window size that optimizes the discrimination of each cover type.

[1]  D. G. Barber,et al.  Multivariate Analysis of Texture Statistics for SAR Sea Ice Discrimination , 1989, 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,.

[2]  Steven E. Franklin,et al.  High Resolution Satellite Image Texture for Moderate Relief Terrain Analysis , 1989, 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,.

[3]  E. LeDrew,et al.  Utilization Of Local Texture Transforms For Adaptive Filtering Sar Sea Ice Imagery , 1989, 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,.

[4]  Michel Massart,et al.  Approche Multitemporelle Et Texturale Des Donnees Spot Multispectrales Pour Le Suivi Agricole En Afrique Centrale. , 1989, 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,.

[5]  A. Coulombe,et al.  Revision Cartographique Et Analyse De Texture: Essais Methodologiques En Milieu Urbain , 1989, 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,.

[6]  F. Maselli,et al.  Forest classification by principal component analyses of TM data , 1988 .

[7]  Xiang Ning Kong,et al.  Effet de la reésolution spatiale sur des proprieeacute;teés statistiques des images satellites: une eétude de cas , 1988 .

[8]  R. J. Brown,et al.  Sar Image Classification of Agricultural Targets Using First- and Second-Order Statistics , 1987 .

[9]  C. Woodcock,et al.  The factor of scale in remote sensing , 1987 .

[10]  Dong-Chien He,et al.  Classification automatique assistée par une analyse de texture, des paysages de la Pointe d'Arçay d'après des données Thematic Mapper , 1987 .

[11]  Jams L. Cushnie The interactive effect of spatial resolution and degree of internal variability within land-cover types on classification accuracies , 1987 .

[12]  D. L. Toll,et al.  Landsat-4 Thematic Mapper scene characteristics of a suburban and rural area , 1985 .

[13]  Darrel L. Williams,et al.  The effects of spatial resolution on the classification of Thematic Mapper data , 1985 .

[14]  Mohan M. Trivedi,et al.  Segmentation of a high-resolution urban scene using texture operators , 1984, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[15]  R. K. Boyd,et al.  A Study of Feature Extraction Using Divergence Analysis of Texture Features , 1982 .

[16]  Victor S. Frost,et al.  Textural Features for Radar Image Analysis , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  J. Townshend,et al.  Land cover classification accuracy as a function of sensor spatial resolution , 1981 .

[18]  R. M. Hoffer,et al.  Computer-based classification accuracy due to the spatial resolution using per-point versus per-field classification techniques. [for photomapping , 1981 .

[19]  Richard W. Conners,et al.  A Theoretical Comparison of Texture Algorithms , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[20]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[21]  J. Gower A General Coefficient of Similarity and Some of Its Properties , 1971 .

[22]  B. Everitt,et al.  Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa. , 1969 .

[23]  H. Hotelling Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. , 1933 .