The characterization, replication and testing of dermal denticles of Scyliorhinus canicula for physical mechanisms of biofouling prevention

There is a current need to develop novel non-toxic antifouling materials. The mechanisms utilized by marine organisms to prevent fouling of external surfaces are of interest in this regard. Biomimicry of these mechanisms and the ability to transfer the antifouling characteristics of these surfaces to artificial surfaces are a highly attractive prospect to those developing antifouling technologies. In order to achieve this, the mechanisms responsible for any antifouling ability must be elucidated from the study of the natural organism and the critical surface parameters responsible for fouling reduction. Dermal denticles of members of the shark family have been speculated to possess some natural, as yet unidentified antifouling mechanism related to the physical presence of denticles. In this study, the dermal denticles of one particular member of the slow-swimming sharks, Scyliorhinus canicula were characterized and it was found that a significant natural variation in denticle dimensions exists in this species. The degree of denticle surface contamination was quantified on denticles at various locations and it was determined that the degree of contamination of the dorsal surface of denticles varies with the position on the shark body. In addition, we successfully produced synthetic sharkskin samples using the real skin as a template. Testing of the produced synthetic skin in field conditions resulted in significant differences in material attachment on surfaces exhibiting denticles of different dimensions.

[1]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Soft lithographic methods for nano-fabrication , 1997 .

[2]  Adam W Feinberg,et al.  Engineered antifouling microtopographies – effect of feature size, geometry, and roughness on settlement of zoospores of the green alga Ulva , 2007, Biofouling.

[3]  G M Whitesides,et al.  Fabrication of topologically complex three-dimensional microfluidic systems in PDMS by rapid prototyping. , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[4]  John Davenport,et al.  Antibacterial and Antisettlement Activity of the Dogfish (Scyliorhinus Canicula) Eggcase , 1996, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[5]  William C. Hamlett,et al.  Sharks, skates, and rays : biology of elasmobranch fishes , 1999 .

[6]  Fiona Regan,et al.  Antifouling strategies for marine and riverine sensors. , 2006, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[7]  J. Costerton,et al.  Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms , 2001, The Lancet.

[8]  Nick Aldred,et al.  Species-specific engineered antifouling topographies: correlations between the settlement of algal zoospores and barnacle cyprids , 2007, Biofouling.

[9]  R. Nys,et al.  Biomimetic characterisation of key surface parameters for the development of fouling resistant materials , 2009, Biofouling.

[10]  P. Motta,et al.  Bristled shark skin: a microgeometry for boundary layer control? , 2008, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[11]  G. Cailliet,et al.  Management of Sharks and Their Relatives , 2000 .

[12]  J. Davenport,et al.  Antifouling performance of the embryo and eggcase of the dogfish Scyliorhinus canicula , 1994 .

[13]  A J Scardino,et al.  Testing attachment point theory: diatom attachment on microtextured polyimide biomimics , 2006, Biofouling.

[14]  D. Sims,et al.  Movements and activity of male and female dogfish in a tidal sea lough: alternative behavioural strategies and apparent sexual segregation , 2001 .

[15]  James F. Schumacher,et al.  Impact of engineered surface microtopography on biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus , 2007, Biointerphases.

[16]  Shark skin: a function in feeding , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Biomimetics: lessons from nature–an overview , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[18]  J. Costerton,et al.  Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. , 1999, Science.

[19]  Martin Wahl,et al.  The Influence of Natural Surface Microtopographies on Fouling , 2004, Biofouling.

[20]  K. Stokes,et al.  Designing biomimetic antifouling surfaces , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[21]  J. Musick,et al.  Management of Sharks and Their Relatives (Elasmobranchii) , 2000 .

[22]  R. Venkatesan,et al.  Marine and Industrial Biofouling , 2009 .

[23]  T. Diamantino,et al.  Marine paints: The particular case of antifouling paints , 2007 .

[24]  Chunxiong Luo,et al.  Artificial lotus leaf by nanocasting. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[25]  R. Nys,et al.  Attachment point theory revisited: the fouling response to a microtextured matrix , 2008, Biofouling.

[26]  M. Thiel,et al.  Relevance of mytilid shell microtopographies for fouling defence – a global comparison , 2010, Biofouling.

[27]  D. Bechert,et al.  Drag reduction mechanisms derived from shark skin , 1986 .

[28]  J. Forrest,et al.  Squalamine: an aminosterol antibiotic from the shark. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  D. W. Bechert,et al.  Fluid Mechanics of Biological Surfaces and their Technological Application , 2000, Naturwissenschaften.

[30]  M. Callow,et al.  Marine biofouling: a sticky problem. , 2002, Biologist.

[31]  Wolf-Ernst Reif,et al.  On the Drag Reduction of the Shark Skin , 1985 .