Affective Feedback from Computers and its Effect on Perceived Ability and Affect: A Test of the Computers as Social Actor Hypothesis

We report an experimental study that examined two questions: (a) The effect of affective feedback from computers on participants’ motivation and self-perception of ability; and (b) whether people respond similarly to computer feedback as they do to human feedback. This study, framed within the Computers As Social Actors (CASA) framework, essentially replicated a prior study on human-human interaction (Meyer, Mittag, & Engler, 1986) except that human evaluators were replaced with computer evaluators. The Meyer et al. study showed that there was a paradoxical relationship between praise and blame feedback and students perception of ability and motivation to engage in a task. Results of our study indicate that, consistent with the CASA hypothesis, people do respond to praise and blame feedback when provided by a computer. However, there are important differences between the results of our study and the Meyer et al. study. The participants in our study took the feedback from the computer at “face value” and seemed unwilling to commit to the same level of “deep psychological processing” about intentionality as they appeared to do with human respondents. We believe that this research combining existing theory and research on motivation and human computer interaction offers signifi cant implications for the design of educational technology and also points to directions for future research. Praise, like penicillin, must not be administered haphazardly. There are rules and cautions that govern the handling of potent medicines—rules

[1]  V. Folkes,et al.  Communicating low ability in the classroom: Bad things good teachers sometimes do. , 1990 .

[2]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Words, thoughts, and theories , 1997 .

[3]  M. Lepper,et al.  The effects of praise on children's intrinsic motivation: a review and synthesis. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  W. Meyer,et al.  Some Effects of Praise and Blame on Perceived Ability and Affect , 1986 .

[5]  Brenda Laurel,et al.  Interface agents: metaphors with character , 1997 .

[6]  Jere Brophy,et al.  Teacher Praise: A Functional Analysis , 1981 .

[7]  Sandy Lovie How the mind works , 1980, Nature.

[8]  Joseph Bates,et al.  The role of emotion in believable agents , 1994, CACM.

[9]  W. Meyer Indirect communications About Perceived Ability Estimates. , 1982 .

[10]  Trish Delamere The importance of interlanguage errors with respect to stereotyping by native speakers in their judgements of second language learners' performance , 1996 .

[11]  D. Stipek Motivation and instruction. , 1996 .

[12]  B. Bower A Child's Theory of Mind , 1993 .

[13]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Learning Interface Agents , 1993, AAAI.

[14]  W. Meyer,et al.  The informational value of evaluative behavior: Influences of praise and blame on perceptions of ability. , 1979 .

[15]  Patrick S.-P. Wang Character And Handwriting Recognition: Expanding Frontiers , 1991 .

[16]  Richard E. Ferdig,et al.  Emotional Responses to Computers: Experiences in Unfairness, Anger, and Spite , 2004 .

[17]  W. Meyer,et al.  Paradoxical Effects of Praise and Criticism on Perceived Ability , 1992 .

[18]  D. Stipek Motivation to Learn: From Theory to Practice , 1992 .

[19]  E. Vesterinen,et al.  Affective Computing , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[20]  Deborah J. Stipek,et al.  Motivation to Learn: From Theory to Practice , 1992 .

[21]  Punya Mishra,et al.  RUNNING HEAD: PEDAGOGICAL SOFTWARE AGENTS All or Nothing: Levels of Sociability of a Pedagogical Software Agent and its Impact on Student Perceptions and Learning , 2005 .

[22]  Suzanne K. Damarin,et al.  The second self: Computers and the human spirit , 1985 .

[23]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Computer power and human reason , 1976, SGAR.

[24]  Alison Cawsey,et al.  Explanatory Dialogues , 1989, Interact. Comput..

[25]  D. Gilbert How mental systems believe. , 1991 .

[26]  James D. Klein,et al.  Control of feedback in computer-assisted instruction , 1991 .

[27]  M. Bassok,et al.  Judging a book by its cover: Interpretative effects of content on problem-solving transfer , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[28]  Martin James Between Parent and Child , 1969, Mental Health.

[29]  M. Lepper,et al.  Motivational techniques of expert human tutors: Lessons for the design of computer-based tutors. , 1993 .

[30]  Kristinn R. Thórisson,et al.  The Power of a Nod and a Glance: Envelope Vs. Emotional Feedback in Animated Conversational Agents , 1999, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[31]  Giacomo Ferrari,et al.  Man-Machine interaction in natural language: Computational models of dialogue , 1986 .

[32]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture , 1992 .

[33]  Brian R. Gaines,et al.  The technology of interaction—dialogue programming rules , 1981 .

[34]  Beverly H. Williges,et al.  User feedback requirements with automatic speech recognition , 1985 .

[35]  Sandra Graham,et al.  A review of attribution theory in achievement contexts , 1991 .

[36]  R. Shepard Mind sights: Original visual illusions, ambiguities, and other anomalies, with a commentary on the play of mind in perception and art , 1990 .

[37]  Christopher G. Lewis The media equation: How people treat computers, televisions, and new media as real people and places , 1997 .

[38]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Silicon sycophants: the effects of computers that flatter , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[39]  María José Alvarez-Torres,et al.  Judging a book by its cover!: cultural stereotyping of interactive media and its effect on the recall of text information , 2001 .

[40]  Ass,et al.  Can computers be teammates? , 1996 .

[41]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[42]  Ted Selker,et al.  COACH: a teaching agent that learns , 1994, CACM.

[43]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[44]  E. Langer,et al.  Matters of mind: Mindfulness/mindlessness in perspective , 1992, Consciousness and Cognition.

[45]  D. Povinelli,et al.  Mindblindness. An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind Simon Baron-Cohen 1995 , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[46]  S. Brison The Intentional Stance , 1989 .

[47]  J. Meece,et al.  Socialization of Achievement Attitudes and Beliefs: Classroom Influences. , 1982 .

[48]  J. Nicholls,et al.  Reasoning about the Ability of Self and Others: A Developmental Study , 1984 .

[49]  B. Weiner,et al.  Using affective cues to infer causal thoughts. , 1982 .

[50]  Susanne P. Lajoie,et al.  Computers As Cognitive Tools , 2020 .

[51]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Are Computers Gender-Neutral? Gender Stereotypic Responses to Computers , 1997 .

[52]  B. Weiner An attributional theory of motivation and emotion , 1986 .

[53]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Consistency of personality in interactive characters: verbal cues, non-verbal cues, and user characteristics , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[54]  M. Lepper,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and instruction: conflicting Views on the Role of Motivational Processes in Computer-Based Education , 1985 .

[55]  Larry Smarr,et al.  Supercomputing and the transformation of science , 1993 .

[56]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Traditional dialogue design applied to modern user interfaces , 1990, CACM.

[57]  James C. Lester,et al.  Animated Pedagogical Agents: Face-to-Face Interaction in Interactive Learning Environments , 2000 .

[58]  Chris Schmandt Voice communication with computers , 1993 .

[59]  Sandra Graham,et al.  Communicating sympathy and anger to Black and White children: The cognitive (attributional) consequences of affective cues. , 1984 .