Subclinical bioprosthetic aortic valve thrombosis: clinical and translational implications

Purpose of review A recently published study has alerted the cardiovascular community to the existence of a significant and previously unrecognized risk of subclinical valve thrombosis following implantation of surgical and catheter-based bioprosthetic valves. The purpose of this article is to review our current understanding of this new clinical entity and to identify unanswered questions and areas for future research. Recent findings Subclinical bioprosthetic valve thrombosis (BPVT) is a more common phenomenon than previously appreciated. It appears that the incidence of BPVT is higher following transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with surgical aortic valve replacement. Four-dimensional computed tomography (CT) is the most sensitive imaging modality for detection of leaflet immobility and subclinical BPVT. Certain echocardiographic findings, such as increasing transaortic gradients, increased cusp thickness and abnormal cusp mobility, predict the presence of BPVT on four-dimensional CT. There is a growing body of evidence linking subclinical BPVT with premature valvular hemodynamic deterioration and structural valve degeneration. Furthermore, subclinical leaflet thrombosis may constitute a nidus for unrecognized subacute cerebral or other thromboembolic events. Oral anticoagulation seems effective in both the prevention and treatment of BPVT. Summary Subclinical valve thrombosis is an important and underappreciated cause of early bioprosthetic valve failure. Although several recent studies have improved our understanding of this newly recognized clinical entity, a number of questions remain unanswered. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the true incidence of subclinical BPVT, its clinical consequences, as well as the optimal antithrombotic regimen following bioprosthetic valve implantation. The subgroups of patients at highest risk of BPVT will need to be identified for risk stratification purposes. Several ongoing clinical trials will shed some light on these important issues.

[1]  Dimitris Mavridis,et al.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2016, European heart journal.

[2]  C. Terkelsen,et al.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Thrombosis: Incidence, Predisposing Factors, and Clinical Implications. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  A. Franco‐Cereceda,et al.  Aortic valve replacement with mechanical vs. biological prostheses in patients aged 50-69 years. , 2016, European heart journal.

[4]  R. Lange,et al.  Incidence and causes of silent and symptomatic stroke following surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a comprehensive review. , 2016, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[5]  J. Webb,et al.  The transcatheter valve technology pipeline for treatment of adult valvular heart disease. , 2016, European heart journal.

[6]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Early hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening in balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic heart valves. , 2016, European heart journal.

[7]  G. Eslick,et al.  Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 40 to 70 Years : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2015 .

[8]  C. Fernández-Golfín,et al.  Three Cases of Early Lotus Valve Thrombosis. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[9]  M. Mack,et al.  Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  B. Gersh,et al.  Anticoagulation for prosthetic heart valves: unresolved questions requiring answers , 2016, Current opinion in cardiology.

[11]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Incidence, Timing, and Predictors of Valve Hemodynamic Deterioration After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Multicenter Registry. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  N. Duraiswamy,et al.  A Parametric Computational Study of the Impact of Non-circular Configurations on Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Leaflet Deformations and Stresses: Possible Implications for Transcatheter Heart Valves , 2016, Cardiovascular engineering and technology.

[13]  A. Ducci,et al.  Possible Subclinical Leaflet Thrombosis in Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  P. Wenaweser,et al.  Expanding Indications of Transcatheter Heart Valve Interventions. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[15]  Patricia A Pellikka,et al.  Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis Versus Structural Failure: Clinical and Echocardiographic Predictors. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  Abby J. Isaacs,et al.  National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements. , 2015, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  R. Virmani,et al.  Thrombus formation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[18]  O. Alfieri,et al.  Treatment and Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Heart Valve Thrombosis , 2015, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[19]  R. Puri,et al.  Valve thrombosis following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review. , 2015, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[20]  N. Gosselin,et al.  Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy for Valvular Disease , 2015 .

[21]  J. Serfaty,et al.  Early Structural Valve Deterioration of Mitroflow Aortic Bioprosthesis: Mode, Incidence, and Impact on Outcome in a Large Cohort of Patients , 2014, Circulation.

[22]  M. Leon,et al.  Imaging and functional testing to assess clinical and subclinical neurological events after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement: a comprehensive review. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  Nancy M Albert,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[24]  S. Høyer,et al.  Two cases of thrombotic stenosis in SAPIEN XT valves after transapical implantation. , 2014, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[25]  Maurice Buchbinder,et al.  Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  A. Andalib,et al.  TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE FAILURE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW , 2014 .

[27]  D. Richens,et al.  Early prosthetic valve degeneration with Mitroflow aortic valves: determination of incidence and risk factors†. , 2013, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[28]  P. Blanke,et al.  Cusp thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement detected by computed tomography and echocardiography. , 2013, European heart journal.

[29]  L. Køber,et al.  Association of Warfarin Therapy Duration After Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement With Risk of Mortality, Thromboembolic Complications, and Bleeding , 2013 .

[30]  Gaetano Burriesci,et al.  Hemodynamics in the Valsalva sinuses after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). , 2013, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[31]  V. Legrand,et al.  Subacute transcatheter CoreValve thrombotic obstruction. , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[32]  G. Pache,et al.  Diagnosis of obstructive thrombosis in a porcine bioprosthesis in the aortic position by contrast-enhanced ECG-gated computer tomography. , 2013, European heart journal.

[33]  O. Alfieri,et al.  Reversible Edwards Sapien XT dysfunction due to prosthesis thrombosis presenting as early structural deterioration. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  J. Després,et al.  ApoB/ApoA-I ratio is associated with increased risk of bioprosthetic valve degeneration. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[35]  G. Esposito,et al.  Bioprostheses "thrombosis" after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[36]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Timing, Predictive Factors, and Prognostic Value of Cerebrovascular Events in a Large Cohort of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve ImplantationClinical Perspective , 2012 .

[37]  O. Alfieri,et al.  Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). , 2012, European heart journal.

[38]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  Early anticoagulation of bioprosthetic aortic valves in older patients: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery National Database. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[39]  M. Ruel,et al.  Cerebral Microembolization After Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: Comparison of Warfarin Plus Aspirin Versus Aspirin Only , 2012, Circulation.

[40]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a Canadian Cardiovascular Society position statement. , 2012, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[41]  P. Corso,et al.  Silent brain injury after cardiac surgery: a review: cognitive dysfunction and magnetic resonance imaging diffusion-weighted imaging findings. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[42]  T. Sundt,et al.  Early thrombosis risk in patients with biologic valves in the aortic position. , 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[43]  Susheel Kodali,et al.  Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[44]  Sanjay Kaul,et al.  2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[45]  A. Carpentier,et al.  Prosthetic valve selection for middle-aged patients with aortic stenosis , 2010, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[46]  S. Pocock,et al.  Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[47]  S. Rahimtoola,et al.  Choice of prosthetic heart valve in adults an update. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[48]  Bijoy K Khandheria,et al.  Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: a report From the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Card , 2009, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[49]  S. Fichtlscherer,et al.  Images in cardiovascular medicine. Thrombotic restenosis after minimally invasive implantation of aortic valve stent. , 2009, Circulation.

[50]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Development : American College of Chest Thrombolytic Therapy Guideline Methodology for Antithrombotic and , 2008 .

[51]  M. Ruel,et al.  Very Long-Term Survival Implications of Heart Valve Replacement With Tissue Versus Mechanical Prostheses in Adults <60 Years of Age , 2007, Circulation.

[52]  J. Després,et al.  Metabolic Syndrome Is Associated With Faster Degeneration of Bioprosthetic Valves , 2006, Circulation.

[53]  V. Fuster,et al.  High risk of thromboemboli early after bioprosthetic cardiac valve replacement. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.