Institutionalising ELSA in the moment of breakdown?

This article discusses outcomes of a dialogue conference on ‘The road ahead for ELSA in Norway: Issues of quality, influence and network cooperation’ held in Oslo in December 2012. Norwegian researchers in the field of ethical, legal and social aspects of technologies (ELSA) were invited to discuss conceptual and strategic issues, as well as the setup of a researcher network. In the article I take an institutionalist approach and discuss challenges in institutionalising an ELSA network at a time when a designated ELSA funding programme is coming to an end. The research question is how the Norwegian ELSA network can succeed as a persistent network in times of greater uncertainties. The article claims that the network needs to gain legitimacy, outlines different dimensions of legitimacy and interprets the conference discussions in light of these dimensions. Central challenges and success factors facing the ELSA network are discussed and the article concludes with reflections on the potential future of ELSA in Norway. Although the article has a Norwegian context, the discussions in the article are likely to be relevant for researchers all across Europe, as similar developments are taking place also elsewhere in the European research funding context.

[1]  T. Das,et al.  Interpartner Legitimacy in the Alliance Development Process* , 2007 .

[2]  R. Scholz,et al.  Transdisciplinarity : joint problem solving among science, technology, and society : an effective way for managing complexity , 2001 .

[3]  Ellen-Marie Forsberg,et al.  Standardisation in the Field of Nanotechnology: Some Issues of Legitimacy , 2012, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[4]  Wesley J. Johnston,et al.  Organizational network legitimacy and its impact on knowledge networks: the case of China's TD‐SCDMA mobility technology , 2010 .

[5]  Michael Grüninger,et al.  Introduction , 2002, CACM.

[6]  P. Stegmaier,et al.  The rock ‘n’ roll of knowledge co‐production , 2009, EMBO reports.

[7]  K. Provan,et al.  Legitimacy Building in the Evolution of Small-Firm Multilateral Networks: A Comparative Study of Success and Demise , 2000 .

[8]  S Holm,et al.  Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th edn. , 2002 .

[9]  Bennet A. Zelner,et al.  Legitimacy , Interest Group Pressures and Institutional Change : The Case of Foreign Investors and Host Country Governments by , 2003 .

[10]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[11]  John W. Meyer.  Reflections on Institutional Theories of Organizations , 2007 .

[12]  Pablo Schyfter,et al.  Towards a Manifesto for Experimental Collaborations between Social and Nartural Scientists , 2012 .

[13]  Anna L. Carew,et al.  The TD Wheel: A heuristic to shape, support and evaluate transdisciplinary research , 2010 .

[14]  P. Wakeley,et al.  Synthesis , 2013, The Role of Animals in Emerging Viral Diseases.

[15]  P. Boyle.  Organizational Ethics in Health Care: Principles, Cases, and Practical Solutions , 2001 .

[16]  T. Beauchamp,et al.  Principles of biomedical ethics , 1991 .

[17]  Organising Ethics: The Case of the Norwegian Army , 2012 .

[18]  E. Forsberg,et al.  Applying instruments for regional innovation – generating projects or legitimacy? , 2012 .

[19]  C. Oliver,et al.  The legitimacy of strategic alliances: an institutional perspective , 2007 .

[20]  H. Lundberg,et al.  Interpartner legitimacy in regional strategic networks , 2011 .

[21]  W. Richard Scott.  Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems , 1981 .

[22]  R. V. Schomberg.  Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation , 2011 .

[23]  C. Mitcham,et al.  Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance From Within , 2006 .

[24]  A. Rip,et al.  The past and future of constructive technology assessment , 1997 .

[25]  C. Hardy.  Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems , 1983 .

[26]  Benjamin Cashore,et al.  Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance: How Non–State Market–Driven (NSMD) Governance Systems Gain Rule–Making Authority , 2002 .

[27]  J. Stilgoe,et al.  Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society , 2012, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[28]  David H. Guston,et al.  Real-time technology assessment , 2020, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.