Evaluating learning in the 21st century: a digital age learning matrix

If the purpose of secondary schooling is to educate the upcoming generation to become active participants in society, evaluation of teaching and learning in the information‐rich digital age should be underpinned by relevant theories and models. This article describes an evaluation tool developed using emerging ideas about knowledge creation and learning in a connected society. The digital age learning matrix was successfully trialled and applied in a study of six digitally able beginning teachers during their first year of teaching to identify aspects of learning occurring as digital technologies were integrated into their teaching practice. An implication of this study is that teachers, even the digitally able, will be limited in their ability to teach the upcoming generation to be active participants in a digitally enhanced society without understanding how to apply theories of learning that are relevant to a digital age into their practice.

[1]  Keith Morrison,et al.  School Leadership and Complexity Theory , 2002 .

[2]  Fethi A. Inan,et al.  Does technology integration “work” when key barriers are removed? , 2008 .

[3]  Nm Breeze,et al.  Transforming teaching and learning: embedding ICT into everyday classroom practices , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[4]  Chao-hsiu Chen Why Do Teachers Not Practice What They Believe Regarding Technology Integration? , 2008 .

[5]  Douglas N. Gordin,et al.  Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. , 2000, The Future of children.

[6]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything , 2006 .

[7]  Paul W. Richardson The culture of education , 1996 .

[8]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis and Expert Thought: Concurrent Verbalizations of Thinking during Experts' Performance on Representative Tasks , 2006 .

[9]  Roger Openshaw,et al.  Catching the Knowledge Wave? the Knowledge Society and the Future of Education , 2007 .

[10]  Kerry K Carney,et al.  Thinking critically. , 2009, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[11]  J. Avery,et al.  The long tail. , 1995, Journal of the Tennessee Medical Association.

[12]  Carl Bereiter,et al.  Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age , 2002 .

[13]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[14]  Harold H. Anderson,et al.  Creativity and Its Cultivation , 1961 .

[15]  Harold H. Anderson,et al.  Creativity and Its Cultivation , 1961 .

[16]  I. McManus Knowing the knowledge. , 1994, Quality in health care : QHC.

[17]  J. Dewey Democracy and education : an introduction to the philosophy of education , 1961 .

[18]  Leonard Carmichael,et al.  Creativity and Its Cultivation , 1961 .

[19]  Kevin F. Collis,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy , 1977 .

[20]  P. Twining Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom , 2002 .

[21]  Malcolm Hunt,et al.  Harnessing technology review 2007. Progress and impact of technology in education. Full Report. , 2007 .

[22]  Brent Davis,et al.  Complexity and Education: Inquiries Into Learning, Teaching, and Research , 2006 .

[23]  Barrie Gunter,et al.  The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researcher of the future , 2008, Aslib Proc..

[24]  Robert E. Stake,et al.  Multiple Case Study Analysis , 2005 .

[25]  Avril Loveless,et al.  Literature Review in Creativity, New Technologies and Learning , 2002 .

[26]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance , 2006 .

[27]  George Siemens Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[28]  Peggy A. Ertmer Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? , 2005 .

[29]  Michael Henderson,et al.  Exemplar schools using innovative learning technologies , 2008 .