Temporal Reliability of Estimates from Contingent Valuation

In 1992 the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) convened a panel of prominent social scientists to assess the reliability of natural resource damage estimates derived from contingent valuation (CV). The product of the panel's deliberations was a report that laid out a set of recommended guidelines for CV survey design, administration, and data analysis. This paper focuses on one of these guidelines -- the Panel's call for the "temporal averaging" of willingness-to-pay (WTP) responses obtained from CV surveys as one method for increasing their reliability. The panel suggested: "Time dependent measurement noise should be reduced by averaging across independently drawn samples taken at different points in time. A clear and substantial time trend in the responses would cast doubt on the 'reliability' of the finding." The purpose of this paper is to examine the temporal reliability of CV estimates. Our findings, using a CV instrument designed to measure willingness-to-pay for a program to protect Prince William Sound, Alaska from future oil spills, like the Exxon Valdez spill, exhibited no significant sensitivity to the timing of the interviews. For two samples involving independent interviews taken over two years apart, the distribution of respondents' choices "for" and "against" the protection program did not differ.

[1]  John Quiggin,et al.  Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a Dichotomous Choice with Follow-Up Questionnaire , 1994 .

[2]  V. Smith,et al.  Nonuse values in benefit cost analysis. , 1987 .

[3]  Douglas A. Hibbs,et al.  Income Distribution in the United States , 1988, American Political Science Review.

[4]  B. Turnbull.  The Empirical Distribution Function with Arbitrarily Grouped, Censored, and Truncated Data , 1976 .

[5]  V. Smith,et al.  The value of avoiding a LULU: hazardous waste disposal sites. , 1986 .

[6]  K. McConnell,et al.  Count Data Models and the Problem of Zeros in Recreation Demand Analysis , 1996 .

[7]  Anna Alberini,et al.  Testing Willingness-to-Pay Models of Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Survey Data , 1995 .

[8]  J. Hausman,et al.  Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number? , 1994 .

[9]  W. Hanemann,et al.  A Contingent Valuation Study of Lost Passive Use Values Resulting From the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill , 1992 .

[10]  W. Hanemann,et al.  Contingent Valuation and Economics , 1994 .

[11]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Three Approaches to Defining "Existence" or "Non-Use" Value under Certainty , 1993 .

[12]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Comparative reliability of the dichotomous choice and open-ended contingent valuation techniques , 1990 .

[13]  Raymond J. Kopp,et al.  Contingent Valuation: Economics, Law and Politics , 1997 .

[14]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation , 1991 .

[15]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Contingent valuation : a critical assessment , 1993 .

[16]  Donald L. Jordan.  NEWSPAPER EFFECTS ON POLICY PREFERENCES , 1993 .

[17]  Anna Alberini,et al.  Efficiency vs Bias of Willingness-to-Pay Estimates: Bivariate and Interval-Data Models , 1995 .

[18]  Barbara Kanninen,et al.  Bias in Discrete Response Contingent Valuation , 1995 .

[19]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[20]  Douglas M. Larson,et al.  On Measuring Existence Value , 1993 .

[21]  Neil A. Powe,et al.  Contingent Valuation and Real Economic Commitments: A Private Good Experiment , 1998 .

[22]  Paul R. Portney,et al.  The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care , 1994 .

[23]  Everett Carll Ladd,et al.  Attitudes Toward the Environment: Twenty-Five Years After Earth Day , 1995 .

[24]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  On the Creation and Destruction of Public Goods: The Matter of Sequencing , 1993 .

[25]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Public Goods as Characteristics of Non-Market Commodities , 1997 .

[26]  R. Carson,et al.  The Value of clean water: The public's willingness to pay for boatable, fishable, and swimmable quality water , 1993 .

[27]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Test-Retest Reliability of the Contingent Valuation Method: A Comparison of General Population and Visitor Responses , 1989 .