Patterns of pollen dispersal in a small population of Pinus sylvestris L. revealed by total-exclusion paternity analysis

Patterns of pollen dispersal were investigated in a small, isolated, relict population of Pinus sylvestris L., consisting of 36 trees. A total-exclusion battery comprising four chloroplast and two nuclear microsatellites (theoretical paternity exclusion probability EP=0.996) was used to assign paternity to 813 seeds, collected from 34 trees in the stand. Long-distance pollen immigration accounted for 4.3% of observed matings. Self-fertilization rate was very high (0.25), compared with typical values in more widespread populations of the species. The average effective pollen dispersal distance within the stand was 48 m (or 83 m excluding selfs). Half of effective pollen was dispersed within 11 m, and 7% beyond 200 m. A strong correlation was found between the distance to the closest tree and the mean mating-distance calculated for single-tree progenies. The effective pollen dispersal distribution showed a leptokurtic shape, with a large and significant departure from that expected under uniform dispersal. A maximum-likelihood procedure was used to fit an individual pollen dispersal distance probability density function (dispersal kernel). The estimated kernel indicated fairly leptokurtic dispersal (shape parameter b=0.67), with an average pollen dispersal distance of 135 m, and 50% of pollen dispersed beyond 30 m. A marked directionality pattern of pollen dispersal was found, mainly caused by the uneven distribution of trees, coupled with restricted dispersal and unequal male success. Overall, results show that the number and distribution of potential pollen donors in small populations may strongly influence the patterns of effective pollen dispersal.

[1]  Michael L. Cain,et al.  Methods for estimating long-distance dispersal , 2003 .

[2]  P. Kevan,et al.  Factors affecting pollen dynamics and its importance to pollen contamination: a review , 1991 .

[3]  D. Lindgren,et al.  Gene dispersion within a population of Pinus sylvestris , 1989 .

[4]  O. Savolainen,et al.  GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION IN THE INBREEDING DEPRESSION OF SCOTS PINE , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  T. J. Crawford.  The estimation of neighbourhood parameters for plant populations , 1984, Heredity.

[6]  J. Burczyk,et al.  Male reproductive success in Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco: the effects of spatial structure and flowering characteristics , 1997, Heredity.

[7]  T. Okuda,et al.  Estimation of gene flow in the tropical‐rainforest tree Neobalanocarpus heimii (Dipterocarpaceae), inferred from paternity analysis , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[8]  R. Clarke,et al.  Long distance seed dispersal by wind: measuring and modelling the tail of the curve , 2000, Oecologia.

[9]  F. Austerlitz,et al.  Pollen dispersal of tropical trees (Dinizia excelsa: Fabaceae) by native insects and African honeybees in pristine and fragmented Amazonian rainforest , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[10]  P. Smouse,et al.  Pollen-mediated gene flow and differential male reproductive success in a tropical pioneer tree, Cecropia obtusifolia Bertol. (Moraceae): a paternity analysis , 1998, Heredity.

[11]  James S. Clark,et al.  Why Trees Migrate So Fast: Confronting Theory with Dispersal Biology and the Paleorecord , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[12]  P. Smouse,et al.  A multiyear estimate of the effective pollen donor pool for Albizia julibrissin , 2003, Heredity.

[13]  R. Sarvas.  Investigations on the flowering and seed crop of Pinus silvestris. , 1962 .

[14]  J. Burczyk,et al.  Mating patterns and pollen dispersal in a natural knobcone pine (Pinus attenuate Lemmon.) stand , 1996, Heredity.

[15]  D. Pot,et al.  Pollen contamination in a maritime pine polycross seed orchard and certification of improved seeds using chloroplast microsatellites , 2001 .

[16]  P. Smouse,et al.  Parentage analysis with genetic markers in natural populations. I. The expected proportion of offspring with unambiguous paternity. , 1988, Genetics.

[17]  Montgomery Slatkin,et al.  Gene Flow in Natural Populations , 1985 .

[18]  P. Driessche,et al.  Dispersal data and the spread of invading organisms. , 1996 .

[19]  B. D. Dow,et al.  Factors influencing male mating success in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa , 1998, New Forests.

[20]  James B. Hicks,et al.  A plant DNA minipreparation: Version II , 1983, Plant Molecular Biology Reporter.

[21]  S. Wright.  Isolation by Distance under Diverse Systems of Mating. , 1946, Genetics.

[22]  V. Koski.  A study of pollen dispersal as a mechanism of gene flow in conifers. , 1970 .

[23]  P. Smouse,et al.  Genetic analysis of male reproductive contributions in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) gray (Liliaceae). , 1994, Genetics.

[24]  P. Smouse,et al.  Pollen movement under alternative silvicultural practices in native populations of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in central Spain , 2004 .

[25]  B. Devlin,et al.  THE EFFECT OF FLOWER PRODUCTION ON MALE REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS IN WILD RADISH POPULATIONS , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  D. Levin,et al.  Gene Flow in Seed Plants , 1974 .

[27]  J. Burczyk,et al.  Complex patterns of mating revealed in a Eucalyptus regnans seed orchard using allozyme markers and the neighbourhood model , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[28]  C. Lian,et al.  Outcrossing and paternity analysis of Pinus densiflora (Japanese red pine) by microsatellite polymorphism , 2001, Heredity.

[29]  W. T. Adams,et al.  Gene dispersal within forest tree populations , 1992, New Forests.

[30]  R. Ennos.  Estimating the relative rates of pollen and seed migration among plant populations , 1994, Heredity.

[31]  H. Steinkellner,et al.  Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. , 1999 .

[32]  C. Strobeck,et al.  Temporal variation of the mating system in a natural population of jack pine. , 1985, Genetics.

[33]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Pollen Dispersal in Low-Density Populations of Three Neotropical Tree Species , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[34]  M. Morgante,et al.  A set of primers for the amplification of 20 chloroplast microsatellites in Pinaceae , 1996, Molecular ecology.

[35]  Elizabeth A. Thompson,et al.  The relationship between single parent and parent pair genetic likelihoods in genealogy reconstruction , 1986 .

[36]  O. Muona,et al.  Effective population sizes, genetic variability, and mating system in natural stands and seed orchards of Pinus sylvestris , 1989 .

[37]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  A Theoretical Framework for Data Analysis of Wind Dispersal of Seeds and Pollen , 1989 .

[38]  Complex population genetic structure in the endemic Canary Island pine revealed using chloroplast microsatellite markers , 2003, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[39]  J. Mitton,et al.  Paternity and gene dispersal in limber pine (Pinus flexilis James) , 2000, Heredity.

[40]  P. Gouyon,et al.  A method to determine the mean pollen dispersal of individual plants growing within a large pollen source , 1996, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[41]  W. Powell,et al.  Characterization of microsatellite loci in Pinus sylvestris L. , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[42]  J. Hamrick,et al.  UNDERSTANDING THE POPULATION GENETIC STRUCTURE OF GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS L.: THE SCALE AND PATTERN OF POLLEN GENE FLOW , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[43]  P. Smouse,et al.  Measuring pollen flow in forest trees: an exposition of alternative approaches , 2004 .

[44]  M. D. Loveless,et al.  ECOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS OF GENETIC STRUCTURE IN PLANT POPULATIONS , 1984 .

[45]  W. Powell,et al.  Chloroplast microsatellites: new tools for studies in plant ecology and evolution. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[46]  N. Ellstrand.  Gene flow by pollen: implications for plant conservation genetics , 1992 .

[47]  A Jamieson,et al.  Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion. , 1997, Animal genetics.

[48]  N. Ellstrand,et al.  POPULATION GENETIC CONSEQUENCES OF SMALL POPULATION SIZE: Implications for Plant Conservation , 1993 .

[49]  A. Harju,et al.  Reproductive success of orchard and nonorchard pollens during different stages of pollen shedding in a Scots pine seed orchard , 1996 .

[50]  O. Savolainen,et al.  The degree of early inbreeding depression determines the selfing rate at the seed stage: model and results from Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine) , 1993, Heredity.