Relative validity and reproducibility of a French dietary history questionnaire.

BACKGROUND A self-administered dietary history questionnaire, especially developed for use in a large French prospective cohort study, was tested for accuracy of food intake measurement by comparing it to the average of 9-12 24-hour recalls. This questionnaire was structured according to the French meal pattern. An important feature of the questionnaire was the separation into a quantification part and qualification part. The first part quantifies consumption by frequency and portion sizes per food group or food item. The second part provides more detailed qualitative information on separate items within one food group. The total number of food items in the questionnaire was 238. METHODS The questionnaire was administered twice to 119 study subjects, with an interval of approximately one year (1990-1991). During that year, 24-hour recalls were carried out monthly. Reproducibility and relative validity of the questionnaire were assessed. RESULTS The correlation coefficients for reproducibility ranged from 0.40 to 0.74 for foods and from 0.54 to 0.75 for nutrients. The correlation coefficients for relative validity ranged from 0.10 to 0.71 for foods and from 0.29 to 0.81 for nutrients (adjustment for total energy and attenuation for nutrients). Percentage of subjects classified in the same or adjacent quintile by questionnaire as well as by 24-hour recall was on average 76% for foods and 72% for nutrients. CONCLUSIONS These data indicate that this questionnaire can be used to classify study subjects according to their food or nutrient intake over a one-year period, within a known degree of precision.

[1]  W. A. van Staveren,et al.  Manual on methodology for food consumption studies. , 1988 .

[2]  G R Howe,et al.  Evaluation of a self-administered dietary questionnaire for use in a cohort study. , 1982, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[3]  E. Riboli,et al.  [Results of a dietary survey in the Calvados. Dietary intake, tobacco and alcohol consumption]. , 1985, Gastroenterologie clinique et biologique.

[4]  J. Palmgren,et al.  Reproducibility and validity of dietary assessment instruments. II. A qualitative food frequency questionnaire. , 1988, American journal of epidemiology.

[5]  P. Corey,et al.  Sources of variance in 24-hour dietary recall data: implications for nutrition study design and interpretation. , 1979, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[6]  B. Jacobsen,et al.  The reproducibility of dietary data from a self-administered questionnaire. The Tromsø Study. , 1990, International journal of epidemiology.

[7]  J. Hankin,et al.  The reproducibility of dietary intake data in a prospective study of gastrointestinal cancer. , 1976, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[8]  W. Willett,et al.  Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. , 1985, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  W Willett,et al.  Total energy intake: implications for epidemiologic analyses. , 1986, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  J. Ambrus,et al.  Critical evaluation. , 1965, The Wistar Institute symposium monograph.

[11]  E. Riboli,et al.  Nutrition and cancer: background and rationale of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). , 1992, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[12]  S A Jebb,et al.  Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-recording. , 1991, European journal of clinical nutrition.

[13]  G A Colditz,et al.  Food-based validation of a dietary questionnaire: the effects of week-to-week variation in food consumption. , 1989, International journal of epidemiology.

[14]  K. Overvad,et al.  Reproducibility and relative validity of a self-administered semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire applied to younger women. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[15]  F. Clavel-Chapelon,et al.  Estimation of food portion size using photographs: validity, strengths, weaknesses and recommendations , 1995 .

[16]  J. Faivre,et al.  A comparison of two diet history questionnaires that measure usual food intake. , 1989, Nutrition and cancer.

[17]  G A Colditz,et al.  Reproducibility and validity of an expanded self-administered semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire among male health professionals. , 1992, American journal of epidemiology.

[18]  G Block,et al.  Validation of a self-administered diet history questionnaire using multiple diet records. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[19]  W. Willett,et al.  Interval estimates for correlation coefficients corrected for within-person variation: implications for study design and hypothesis testing. , 1988, American journal of epidemiology.