Artefacts as designed, artefacts as used: resources for uncovering activity dynamics

This paper addresses the use of artefacts as a powerful resource for analysis, focusing on the ‘artefact as designed’ as a means of eliciting the designers’ explicit and implicit knowledge and ‘artefacts as used’ as a means of uncovering the trail left by currently inactive processes. Artefact analysis is particularly suitable in situations where direct observation is ineffective, especially in activities that occur infrequently. We demonstrate the usefulness of our technique through the analysis of artefacts within both the office and the meeting environment. This is part of a wider study aimed at understanding the nature of decisions in meetings with the view of producing a tool to aid decision management and hence reduce rework. We conclude by drawing out some general lessons from our analysis, which reaffirms the intricate role that artefacts play in maintaining activity dynamics.

[1]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Design rationale: concepts, techniques, and use , 1996 .

[2]  Bill Moggridge,et al.  Designing interactions , 2006 .

[3]  Duska Rosenberg,et al.  Design Issues in CSCW , 1994, Computer Supported Cooperative Work.

[4]  Ian Sommerville,et al.  Artefact-Centred Analysis - Transect and Archaeological Approaches , 2001 .

[5]  O. Bertelsen,et al.  Activity Theory , 2003 .

[6]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  CHAPTER 11 – Activity Theory , 2003 .

[7]  Douglas C. Engelbart,et al.  A research center for augmenting human intellect , 1968, AFIPS Fall Joint Computing Conference.

[8]  Alan Dix.  Computer Supported Cooperative Work: A Framework , 1994 .

[9]  Kuntz Werner,et al.  Issues as Elements of Information Systems , 1970 .

[10]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Presenting ethnography in the requirements process , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE'95).

[11]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Distributed cognition: an alternative framework for analysing and explaining collaborative working , 1994, J. Inf. Technol..

[12]  Devina Ramduny-Ellis,et al.  19 Trigger Analysis : Understanding Broken Tasks , 2003 .

[13]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  Design rationale: Concepts, techniques, and use , 1997 .

[14]  Frank Spillers,et al.  Task Analysis through Cognitive Archeology. , 2003 .

[15]  E. Hutchins.  Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[16]  Christian Heath,et al.  Collaboration and controlCrisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms , 1992, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[17]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers , 1994, CACM.

[18]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[19]  Alan J. Dix,et al.  Managing the Ecology of Interaction , 2002, TAMODIA.

[20]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  Analyzing the Usability of a Design Rationale Notation , 1996 .

[21]  Lucy Suchman.  Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[22]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Classroom 2000: An Experiment with the Instrumentation of a Living Educational Environment , 1999, IBM Syst. J..

[23]  Lev Vygotsky.  Mind in society , 1978 .

[24]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  The technology of team navigation , 1990 .

[25]  H. Rex Hartson,et al.  Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[26]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  Questions, Options, and Criteria: Elements of Design Space Analysis , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[27]  Alan J. Dix,et al.  Interaction in the large , 1998, Interact. Comput..

[28]  Michael L. Begeman,et al.  gIBIS: A tool for all reasons , 1989, JASIS.

[29]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Compendium: Making Meetings into Knowledge Events , 2001 .

[30]  Devina Ramduny-Ellis,et al.  Trigger Analysis - understanding broken tasks , 2003 .

[31]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Integrating Meeting Capture within a Collaborative Team Environment , 2001, UbiComp.

[32]  Devina Ramduny-Ellis,et al.  Redefining Organisational Memory- Artefacts and the Distribution and Coordination of Work , 1998 .

[33]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  WYSIWIS revised: early experiences with multiuser interfaces , 1987, TOIS.

[34]  Andrew Howes,et al.  Display-Based Competence: Towards User Models for Menu-Driven Interfaces , 1990, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[35]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  Beyond the Interface: Encountering Artifacts in Use , 1989 .