Cell Elasticity Is Regulated by the Tropomyosin Isoform Composition of the Actin Cytoskeleton

The actin cytoskeleton is the primary polymer system within cells responsible for regulating cellular stiffness. While various actin binding proteins regulate the organization and dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton, the proteins responsible for regulating the mechanical properties of cells are still not fully understood. In the present study, we have addressed the significance of the actin associated protein, tropomyosin (Tpm), in influencing the mechanical properties of cells. Tpms belong to a multi-gene family that form a co-polymer with actin filaments and differentially regulate actin filament stability, function and organization. Tpm isoform expression is highly regulated and together with the ability to sort to specific intracellular sites, result in the generation of distinct Tpm isoform-containing actin filament populations. Nanomechanical measurements conducted with an Atomic Force Microscope using indentation in Peak Force Tapping in indentation/ramping mode, demonstrated that Tpm impacts on cell stiffness and the observed effect occurred in a Tpm isoform-specific manner. Quantitative analysis of the cellular filamentous actin (F-actin) pool conducted both biochemically and with the use of a linear detection algorithm to evaluate actin structures revealed that an altered F-actin pool does not absolutely predict changes in cell stiffness. Inhibition of non-muscle myosin II revealed that intracellular tension generated by myosin II is required for the observed increase in cell stiffness. Lastly, we show that the observed increase in cell stiffness is partially recapitulated in vivo as detected in epididymal fat pads isolated from a Tpm3.1 transgenic mouse line. Together these data are consistent with a role for Tpm in regulating cell stiffness via the generation of specific populations of Tpm isoform-containing actin filaments.

[1]  I. N. Sneddon The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile , 1965 .

[2]  S. Heinemann,et al.  Clonal cell lines from the rat central nervous system , 1974, Nature.

[3]  J. Spudich,et al.  Nonmuscle contractile proteins: the role of actin and myosin in cell motility and shape determination. , 1977, Annual review of biochemistry.

[4]  N O Petersen,et al.  Dependence of locally measured cellular deformability on position on the cell, temperature, and cytochalasin B. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  P. Janmey,et al.  Structure and mobility of actin filaments as measured by quasielastic light scattering, viscometry, and electron microscopy. , 1986, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[6]  L. Kedes,et al.  A human beta-actin expression vector system directs high-level accumulation of antisense transcripts. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  J. Lessard Two monoclonal antibodies to actin: one muscle selective and one generally reactive. , 1988, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[8]  James A. Spudich,et al.  Capping of surface receptors and concomitant cortical tension are generated by conventional myosin , 1989, Nature.

[9]  Paul A. Janmey,et al.  Resemblance of actin-binding protein/actin gels to covalently crosslinked networks , 1990, Nature.

[10]  D H Wachsstock,et al.  Cross-linker dynamics determine the mechanical properties of actin gels. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[11]  V. Moy,et al.  Mechanical properties of L929 cells measured by atomic force microscopy: effects of anticytoskeletal drugs and membrane crosslinking. , 2006, Scanning.

[12]  P. Gunning,et al.  Sorting of tropomyosin isoforms in synchronised NIH 3T3 fibroblasts: evidence for distinct microfilament populations. , 2000, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[13]  H. Haga,et al.  Elasticity mapping of living fibroblasts by AFM and immunofluorescence observation of the cytoskeleton. , 2000, Ultramicroscopy.

[14]  D. Wirtz,et al.  Strain Hardening of Actin Filament Networks , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  C Rotsch,et al.  Drug-induced changes of cytoskeletal structure and mechanics in fibroblasts: an atomic force microscopy study. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[16]  E. Ostap,et al.  Motor domain-dependent localization of myo1b (myr-1) , 2001, Current Biology.

[17]  E. Elson,et al.  Effects of cytochalasin D and latrunculin B on mechanical properties of cells. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[18]  K. Bhadriraju,et al.  Extracellular matrix- and cytoskeleton-dependent changes in cell shape and stiffness. , 2002, Experimental cell research.

[19]  J. Cooper Actin Dynamics: Tropomyosin Provides Stability , 2002, Current Biology.

[20]  Gary G. Borisy,et al.  Mechanism of filopodia initiation by reorganization of a dendritic network , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[21]  Nicole S. Bryce,et al.  Specification of actin filament function and molecular composition by tropomyosin isoforms. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[22]  C. Otey,et al.  B35 neuroblastoma cells: an easily transfected, cultured cell model of central nervous system neurons. , 2003, Methods in cell biology.

[23]  Daniel Isabey,et al.  Time course of actin cytoskeleton stiffness and matrix adhesion molecules in human bronchial epithelial cell cultures. , 2003, Experimental cell research.

[24]  J. Sellers,et al.  Mechanism of Blebbistatin Inhibition of Myosin II* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  L. Forró,et al.  Superficial and deep changes of cellular mechanical properties following cytoskeleton disassembly. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[26]  Peter Gunning,et al.  Specific features of neuronal size and shape are regulated by tropomyosin isoforms. , 2005, Molecular biology of the cell.

[27]  M. Radmacher,et al.  Influence of myosin II activity on stiffness of fibroblast cells. , 2005, Acta biomaterialia.

[28]  Alan Hall,et al.  Rho GTPases: biochemistry and biology. , 2005, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[29]  A. Bausch,et al.  Cytoskeletal polymer networks: The molecular structure of cross-linkers determines macroscopic properties , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  D A Weitz,et al.  Prestressed F-actin networks cross-linked by hinged filamins replicate mechanical properties of cells. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Beth S. Lee,et al.  Tropomyosin isoforms localize to distinct microfilament populations in osteoclasts. , 2006, Bone.

[32]  Pekka Lappalainen,et al.  Stress fibers are generated by two distinct actin assembly mechanisms in motile cells , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[33]  Manfred Radmacher,et al.  Softening of the actin cytoskeleton by inhibition of myosin II , 2008, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology.

[34]  Paul A. Janmey,et al.  Soft biological materials and their impact on cell function. , 2007, Soft matter.

[35]  H. Higgs,et al.  The many faces of actin: matching assembly factors with cellular structures , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[36]  Jeremy J Mao,et al.  Cytoskeletal Changes of Mesenchymal Stem Cells During Differentiation , 2007, ASAIO journal.

[37]  Chanmin Su,et al.  Quantitative Mechanical Property Mapping at the Nanoscale with PeakForce QNM , 2008 .

[38]  Strain-induced orientation response of endothelial cells: effect of substratum adhesiveness and actin-myosin contractile level. , 2008, Molecular & cellular biomechanics : MCB.

[39]  J. Alcaraz,et al.  Micropatterning of single endothelial cell shape reveals a tight coupling between nuclear volume in G1 and proliferation. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[40]  F. Yin,et al.  Mechanical properties of actin stress fibers in living cells. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[41]  G. O'Neill,et al.  Divergent Regulation of the Sarcomere and the Cytoskeleton* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[42]  G. O'Neill,et al.  Tropomyosin-based regulation of the actin cytoskeleton in time and space. , 2008, Physiological reviews.

[43]  Nicole S. Bryce,et al.  Tropomyosin isoforms define distinct microfilament populations with different drug susceptibility. , 2008, European journal of cell biology.

[44]  David A Weitz,et al.  Chapter 19: Mechanical response of cytoskeletal networks. , 2008, Methods in cell biology.

[45]  D. Raabe,et al.  The use of flat punch indentation to determine the viscoelastic properties in the time and frequency domains of a soft layer bonded to a rigid substrate. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[46]  Sydney,et al.  Cytoskeletal Tropomyosin Tm5nm1 Is Required for Normal Excitation-contraction Coupling in Skeletal Muscle , 2022 .

[47]  G. Gallo,et al.  Myosin‐II negatively regulates minor process extension and the temporal development of neuronal polarity , 2009, Developmental neurobiology.

[48]  Jiye Cai,et al.  Connection between biomechanics and cytoskeleton structure of lymphocyte and Jurkat cells: An AFM study. , 2010, Micron.

[49]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  Nanotopography-induced changes in focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, and mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[50]  Alex R. Hodges,et al.  Differential Regulation of Unconventional Fission Yeast Myosins via the Actin Track , 2010, Current Biology.

[51]  Hans-Georg Kräusslich,et al.  A quantitative measure for alterations in the actin cytoskeleton investigated with automated high‐throughput microscopy , 2010, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[52]  Daniel P. Mulvihill,et al.  The recruitment of acetylated and unacetylated tropomyosin to distinct actin polymers permits the discrete regulation of specific myosins in fission yeast , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[53]  Nicole S. Bryce,et al.  Tropomyosin isoform modulation of focal adhesion structure and cell migration , 2010, Cell adhesion & migration.

[54]  M. Desouza,et al.  Tropomyosin isoform 3 promotes the formation of filopodia by regulating the recruitment of actin-binding proteins to actin filaments. , 2011, Experimental cell research.

[55]  Zhuxin Dong,et al.  Determination of mechanical properties of soft tissue scaffolds by atomic force microscopy nanoindentation. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[56]  T. Fath,et al.  Tropomyosin isoforms and reagents , 2011, Bioarchitecture.

[57]  M. Lekka,et al.  Depth-sensing analysis of cytoskeleton organization based on AFM data , 2011, European Biophysics Journal.

[58]  David G. Drubin,et al.  Building Distinct Actin Filament Networks in a Common Cytoplasm , 2011, Current Biology.

[59]  D. Kovar,et al.  Three's company: the fission yeast actin cytoskeleton. , 2011, Trends in cell biology.

[60]  Jianping Fu,et al.  Cell shape and substrate rigidity both regulate cell stiffness. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[61]  G. Schevzov,et al.  A Molecular Pathway for Myosin II Recruitment to Stress Fibers , 2011, Current Biology.

[62]  Manfred Radmacher,et al.  Comparison of mechanical properties of normal and malignant thyroid cells. , 2012, Micron.

[63]  Byungkyu Kim,et al.  Cell Stiffness Is a Biomarker of the Metastatic Potential of Ovarian Cancer Cells , 2012, PloS one.

[64]  T. Fath,et al.  Functional diversity of actin cytoskeleton in neurons and its regulation by tropomyosin. , 2012, International review of cell and molecular biology.

[65]  Celine Elie-Caille,et al.  Glyphosate-induced stiffening of HaCaT keratinocytes, a Peak Force Tapping study on living cells. , 2012, Journal of structural biology.

[66]  Masoud Agah,et al.  The effects of cancer progression on the viscoelasticity of ovarian cell cytoskeleton structures. , 2012, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[67]  E. Krementsova,et al.  Tropomyosin Is Essential for Processive Movement of a Class V Myosin from Budding Yeast , 2012, Current Biology.

[68]  M. Lekka,et al.  Cancer cell recognition--mechanical phenotype. , 2012, Micron.

[69]  J. Käs,et al.  Keratins significantly contribute to cell stiffness and impact invasive behavior , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[70]  Rudolf Merkel,et al.  Keratins as the main component for the mechanical integrity of keratinocytes , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[71]  David A Weitz,et al.  The role of vimentin intermediate filaments in cortical and cytoplasmic mechanics. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[72]  P. Gunning,et al.  Cytoskeletal tropomyosins: choreographers of actin filament functional diversity , 2013, Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility.

[73]  Hannah Freittag,et al.  Tropomyosins induce neuritogenesis and determine neurite branching patterns in B35 neuroblastoma cells , 2014, Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience.

[74]  Paul A. Janmey,et al.  Vimentin enhances cell elastic behavior and protects against compressive stress. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[75]  J. Stehn,et al.  Validation of an Algorithm to Quantify Changes in Actin Cytoskeletal Organization , 2014, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[76]  A. Nagy,et al.  Regulation of Nonmuscle Myosin II by Tropomyosin , 2014, Biochemistry.

[77]  K. Trybus,et al.  Fission yeast tropomyosin specifies directed transport of myosin-V along actin cables , 2014, Molecular biology of the cell.

[78]  Kishan Dholakia,et al.  Discrimination of bladder cancer cells from normal urothelial cells with high specificity and sensitivity: combined application of atomic force microscopy and modulated Raman spectroscopy. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[79]  A systematic nomenclature for mammalian tropomyosin isoforms , 2014, Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility.

[80]  V. Fowler,et al.  Differential Actin-regulatory Activities of Tropomodulin1 and Tropomodulin3 with Diverse Tropomyosin and Actin Isoforms* , 2014, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[81]  Aaron P. Mosier,et al.  Microfluidic Platform for the Elastic Characterization of Mouse Submandibular Glands by Atomic Force Microscopy , 2014, Biosensors.