An Evaluation of Lidar-derived Elevation and Terrain Slope in Leaf-off Conditions

The effects of land cover and surface slope on lidar-derived elevation data were examined for a watershed in the piedmont of North Carolina. Lidar data were collected over the study area in a winter (leaf-off) overflight. Survey-grade elevation points (1,225) for six different land cover classes were used as reference points. Root mean squared error (RMSE) for land cover classes ranged from 14.5 cm to 36.1 cm. Land cover with taller canopy vegetation exhibited the largest errors. The largest mean error (36.1 cm RMSE) was in the scrub-shrub cover class. Over the small slope range (0° to 10°) in this study area, there was little evidence for an increase in elevation error with increased slopes. However, for low grass land cover, elevation errors do increase in a consistent manner with increasing slope. Slope errors increased with increasing surface slope, under-predicting true slope on surface slopes � 2°. On average, the lidarderived elevation under-predicted true elevation regardless of land cover category. The under-prediction was significant, and ranged up to � 23.6 cm under pine land cover.

[1]  M. Hodgson,et al.  Accuracy of Airborne Lidar-Derived Elevation: Empirical Assessment and Error Budget , 2004 .

[2]  M. Hodgson,et al.  An evaluation of LIDAR- and IFSAR-derived digital elevation models in leaf-on conditions with USGS Level 1 and Level 2 DEMs , 2003 .

[3]  Robert N. Swift,et al.  Aircraft laser altimetry measurement of elevation changes of the greenland ice sheet: technique and accuracy assessment , 2002 .

[4]  J. Chandler,et al.  Evaluation of Lidar and Medium Scale Photogrammetry for Detecting Soft‐Cliff Coastal Change , 2002 .

[5]  Zachary H. Bowen,et al.  EVALUATION OF LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING (LIDAR) FOR MEASURING RIVER CORRIDOR TOPOGRAPHY 1 , 2002 .

[6]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Deriving DSMs from LiDAR data with kriging , 2002 .

[7]  H. Maas.  Methods for measuring height and planimetry discrepancies in airborne laserscanner data , 2002 .

[8]  J. R. Jensen,et al.  Creation of digital terrain models using an adaptive lidar vegetation point removal process , 2002 .

[9]  D. Mason,et al.  Image processing of airborne scanning laser altimetry data for improved river flood modelling , 2001 .

[10]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  Effects of Digital Elevation Model Accuracy on Hydrologic Predictions , 2000 .

[11]  Michael E. Hodgson,et al.  A GIS-ASSISTED RAIL CONSTRUCTION ECONOMETRIC MODEL THAT INCORPORATES LIDAR DATA , 2000 .

[12]  J. R. Jensen.  Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective , 2000 .

[13]  J. Means,et al.  Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning lidar , 2000 .

[14]  P. Reiss,et al.  Laser scanning—surveying and mapping agencies are using a new technique for the derivation of digital terrain models , 1999 .

[15]  K. Kraus,et al.  Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data , 1998 .

[16]  P. Bolstad,et al.  An evaluation of DEM accuracy: elevation, slope, and aspect , 1994 .

[17]  F. David.  Introduction to digital elevation models (DEM) , 1994 .

[18]  Trevor Louis Charles Griffin.  Measurements from maps , 1990 .

[19]  Michael E. Hodgson,et al.  Correlation between aircraft MSS and LIDAR remotely sensed data on a forested wetland in South Carolina , 1987 .

[20]  John R. Jensen,et al.  The Orthophoto and Orthophotomap: Characteristics, Development and Application , 1976 .