$Maximin_{h}$ Stability in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution for Bilateral Conflicts

In this paper, our objective is to propose a stability concept within the graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR) that does not require knowledge about preferences of other decision makers (DMs) in the conflict and is flexible to analyze the conflict with variable horizon. For that we propose the use of the maximin decision rule within the GMCR. More specifically, we consider a GMCR with two DMs and introduce the concept of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${Maximin}_{h}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> stability with horizon <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$h$ </tex-math></inline-formula> for a given DM. The <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${Maximin}_{h}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> stability concept was inspired by the notion of limited-move stability with horizon <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$h$ </tex-math></inline-formula> present in the GMCR literature and it is adequate for modeling cautious DMs in conflicts where they have no knowledge about the other DM’s preferences. We establish what is the relationship among the <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${Maximin}_{h}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> stabilities for different horizons and the relationship among <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${Maximin}_{h}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> stability and other GMCR stability concepts. Finally, we present an application to illustrate the proposed stability concept, namely, a neuroscience technological selection conflict in China.

[1]  Leandro Chaves Rêgo,et al.  Upper and lower probabilistic preferences in the graph model for conflict resolution , 2018, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[2]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Interrelationships among attitude-based and conventional stability concepts within the graph model for conflict resolution , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[3]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Propositions on interrelationships among attitude-based stability concepts , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[4]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Non-Cooperative Stability Definitions for Strategic Analysis of Generic Water Resources Conflicts , 2011 .

[5]  K. Madani Modeling international climate change negotiations more responsibly: Can highly simplified game theory models provide reliable policy insights? , 2013 .

[6]  E. Rowland Theory of Games and Economic Behavior , 1946, Nature.

[7]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  The graph model for conflicts , 1987, Autom..

[8]  Peng Xu,et al.  Integrating an Option-Oriented Attitude Analysis into Investigating the Degree of Stabilities in Conflict Resolution , 2018, Group Decision and Negotiation.

[9]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  A New Approach to Coalition Analysis Within the Graph Model , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[10]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Strength of preference in graph models for multiple-decision-maker conflicts , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[11]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Preference uncertainty in the graph model for conflict resolution , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[12]  Abraham Kandel,et al.  Fuzzy moves , 1998, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[13]  Luis G. Vargas Conflict analysis: Models and resolutions: Niall M. FRASER and Keith W. HIPEL Volume 11 in: North-Holland Series in System Science and Engineering, North-Holland, New York, 1984, xx + 377 pages, $34.50 , 1985 .

[14]  Leandro C. Rego,et al.  Probabilistic Preferences in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[15]  Tom Gilb,et al.  Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution , 1994 .

[16]  Leandro Chaves Rêgo,et al.  Symmetric Sequential Stability in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution with Multiple Decision Makers , 2017 .

[17]  Stephen J. Willson,et al.  Long-Term Behavior in the Theory of Moves , 1998 .

[18]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Fuzzy Preferences in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[19]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Solving Complex Conflicts , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[20]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Multiple levels of preference in interactive strategic decisions , 2009, Discret. Appl. Math..

[21]  Li Zhou,et al.  A Dynamic Bounded Rationality Model for Technology Selection in Cognition Process , 2018 .

[22]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Modeling Fuzzy and Interval Fuzzy Preferences Within a Graph Model Framework , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[23]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Fuzzy approaches to the game of Chicken , 2001, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[24]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Fuzzy levels of preference strength in a graph model with multiple decision makers , 2019, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[25]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Fuzzy strength of preference in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution with two decision makers , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[26]  Leandro Chaves Rêgo,et al.  Interactive Unawareness in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[27]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  First-Level Hypergame for Investigating Misperception in Conflicts , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[28]  Klaus Reinhardt Interactive Decision Making The Graph Model For Conflict Resolution , 2016 .

[29]  Charles Leake Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution , 1993 .

[30]  S. Walker,et al.  Conflict analysis approaches for investigating attitudes and misperceptions in the War of 1812 , 2007 .

[31]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Perceptual Graph Model Systems , 2009 .

[32]  S. Brams Theory of moves , 1993 .

[33]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Perceptual Stability Analysis of a Graph Model System , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[34]  J. Nash Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games. , 1950, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Grey-Based Preference in a Graph Model for Conflict Resolution With Multiple Decision Makers , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[36]  Lyn C. Thomas,et al.  Conflict Analysis: Models and Resolutions , 1985 .