How would Swiss consumers decide if they had freedom of choice? Evidence from a field study with organic, conventional and GM corn bread

In 2005, the Swiss expressed their negative attitude towards genetic engineering in agriculture by voting in favor of a ban to use genetically modified (GM) crops in domestic agriculture. At the same time, certain GM food products remain approved but are not on offer since retailers assume that consumers would shun labeled GM food. In our study we tested this claim by conducting a large-scale field study with Swiss consumers. In our experimental design, three clearly labeled types of corn bread were offered at five different market stands across the French and German-speaking part of Switzerland: one made with organic, one made with conventional, and one made with genetically modified (GM) corn. In addition, we tested the consistency between purchasing decision at the market stand and the previous voting decision on GMOs in 2005 by means of an ex-post questionnaire. The results of our discrete choice analysis show that Swiss consumers treat GM foods just like any other type of novel food. We conclude from our findings that consumers tend to appreciate transparency and freedom of choice even if one of the offered product types is labeled as containing a genetically modified ingredient. Retailers should allow consumers to make their own choice and accept the fact that not all people appear to be afraid of GM food.

[1]  Steven S. Vickner,et al.  Sentiments and acts towards genetically modified foods , 2005 .

[2]  Agnes Allansdottir,et al.  Europeans and biotechnology in 2005: patterns and trends: final report on Eurobarometer 64.3 , 2006 .

[3]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Perception of gene technology, and food risks: results of a survey in Switzerland , 2003 .

[4]  Klaus G. Grunert,et al.  Attitudes towards the use of GMOs in food production and their impact on buying intention: The role of positive sensory experience , 2004 .

[5]  John C. Bernard,et al.  The next new thing: curiosity and the motivation to purchase novel products , 2005 .

[6]  T. Bernauer,et al.  Stakeholder attitudes toward GMOs in the Philippines, Mexico, and South Africa: The issue of public trust , 2006 .

[7]  Klaus G. Grunert,et al.  A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels , 2007, Journal of Public Health.

[8]  Terence A. Shimp,et al.  Effects of involvement, argument strength, and source characteristics on central and peripheral processing of advertising , 1990 .

[9]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Risk as narrative value: a theoretical framework for facilitating the biotechnology debate , 2005 .

[10]  M. Hammerl I Like It, but Only When I'm Not Sure Why: Evaluative Conditioning and the Awareness Issue , 2000, Consciousness and Cognition.

[11]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choices, Values, and Frames , 2000 .

[12]  John F. Sherry,et al.  The Sacred and the Profane in Consumer Behavior: Theodicy on the Odyssey , 1989 .

[13]  D. Ariely,et al.  Conceptual consumption. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[14]  Joachim Scholderer,et al.  Closing the gap between values and behavior—a means–end theory of lifestyle , 2004 .

[15]  M. Siegrist Belief in gene technology : The influence of environmental attitudes and gender , 1998 .

[16]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[17]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The Construction of Preference: References , 2006 .

[18]  A. Einsele The gap between science and perception: the case of plant biotechnology in Europe. , 2007, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[19]  Stéphane Robin,et al.  Do Consumers Really Refuse to Buy Genetically Modified Food? , 2004 .

[20]  P. Bogard The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals , 2007 .

[21]  Tracy Irani,et al.  ADVOCACY ADVERTISING FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY: The Effect of Public Accountability on Corporate Trust and Attitude Toward the Ad , 2005 .

[22]  D. Mather,et al.  Acceptance of GM food—an experiment in six countries , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  A. Zago,et al.  A simple model of voluntary vs mandatory labelling of GMOs , 2001 .

[24]  F. Carlsson,et al.  Consumer Benefits of Labels and Bans on GM Foods—Choice Experiments with Swedish Consumers , 2007 .