Materiality and Change: Challenges to Building Better Theory about Technology and Organizing

Researchers have had difficulty accommodating materiality in voluntaristic theories of organizing. Although materiality surely shapes how people use technologies, materiality's role in organizational change remains under-theorized. We suggest that scholars have had difficulty grappling with materiality because they often conflate the distinction between the material and social with the distinction between determinism and voluntarism. We explain why such conflation is unnecessary and outline four challenges that researchers must address before they can reconcile the reality of materiality with the notion that outcomes of technological change are socially constructed.

[1]  Stephen R. Barley,et al.  What can we learn from the history of technology , 1998 .

[2]  T. Lupton,et al.  A Conceptual Scheme for Organizational Analysis , 1963 .

[3]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Transformational Technologies and the Creation of New Work Practices: Making Implicit Knowledge Explicit in Task-based Offshoring , 2008, MIS Q..

[4]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  A Web on the Wind: The Structure of Invisible Work , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[6]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Learning from adopters' experiences with ERP: problems encountered and success achieved , 2000, J. Inf. Technol..

[7]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  The Sage handbook of organizational communication : advances in theory, research, and methods , 2001 .

[8]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Activating the Informational Capabilities of Information Technology for Organizational Change , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[9]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[10]  M. Markus Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[11]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  A Practice Perspective on Technology-Mediated Network Relations: The Use of Internet-Based Self-Serve Technologies , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  S. Barley The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. , 1990, Administrative science quarterly.

[13]  E. Rogers,et al.  Reinvention in the Innovation Process , 1980 .

[14]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[15]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  Transforming Work Through Information Technology: A Comparative Case Study of Geographic Information Systems in County Government , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  Knowledge management technology and the reproduction of knowledge work practices , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[18]  C. Perrow Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay , 1975 .

[19]  G. DeSanctis,et al.  Structuration Theory in Information Systems Research: Methods and Controversies , 2004 .

[20]  C. Erik Timmerman,et al.  Ironic uses of group communication technology: Evidence from meeting transcripts and interviews with group decision support system users , 1998 .

[21]  M. Schlossberg Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge. , 1990 .

[22]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[23]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Emerging Theories of Communication in Organizations , 1991 .

[24]  W. F. Christopher,et al.  Management for the 1980s , 1980 .

[25]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology adaption: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team 1 , 2000 .

[26]  Erica L. Wagner,et al.  Networks, negotiations, and new times: the implementation of enterprise resource planning into an academic administration , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[27]  Sten Jönsson Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[28]  H. Braverman Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century , 1996 .

[29]  W. Orlikowski Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[30]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[31]  Michael Lynch,et al.  Art and artifact in laboratory science , 1985 .

[32]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other? , 2001, MIS Q..

[33]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[34]  Francine Schlosser So, How Do People Really Use Their Handheld Devices? An Interactive Study of Wireless Technology Use , 2002 .

[35]  Robert J. Thomas,et al.  What machines can't do : politics and technology in the industrial enterprise , 1995 .

[36]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Cross-Cultural Software Production and Use: A Structurational Analysis , 2002, MIS Q..

[37]  E. Trist,et al.  Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-Getting , 1951 .

[38]  A. K. Rice Productivity and Social Organization in an Indian Weaving Shed , 1953 .

[39]  Steven P. Vallas,et al.  Symbolic boundaries and the new division of labor: Engineers, workers and the restructuring of factory life , 2001 .

[40]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-Supported Inter-Organizational Virtual Team , 2000, MIS Q..

[41]  Joan H. Fujimura,et al.  Sex Genes: A Critical Sociomaterial Approach to the Politics and Molecular Genetics of Sex Determination , 2006, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[42]  Janet Fulk Social construction of communication technology , 1993 .

[43]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[44]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions , 2006 .

[45]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[46]  Ian Hutchby,et al.  Technologies, Texts and Affordances , 2001 .

[47]  Michael Lynch,et al.  Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory , 1985 .

[48]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Sources of Influence on Beliefs about Information Technolgoy Use: An Empirical Study of Knowledge Workers , 2003, MIS Q..

[49]  E BaileyDiane,et al.  Transformational technologies and the creation of new work practices , 2008 .

[50]  K. Gergen An invitation to social construction , 1999 .

[51]  James D. Thompson,et al.  Technology, Organization, and Administration , 1957 .

[52]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Problematizing "New Media": Culturally Based Perceptions of Cell Phones, Computers, and the Internet among United States Latinos , 2003 .

[53]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: A Review of Culture in Information Systems Research: Toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict , 2006, MIS Q..

[54]  Jeremiah J. O'Connell,et al.  Managing organizational innovation , 1968 .

[55]  Andrew Pickering,et al.  The mangle of practice : time, agency, and science , 1997 .

[56]  K. K. Cetina,et al.  The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory , 2001 .

[57]  S. Barley Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[58]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Technology and Organization Structure: A Re-examination of the Findings of the Aston Group , 1972 .

[59]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities , 1999, MIS Q..

[60]  F. Mann,et al.  Observations on the Dynamics of a Change to Electronic Data-Processing Equipment , 1960 .

[61]  D. Hickson Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View , 1972 .

[62]  Joan H. Fujimura,et al.  The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in Twentieth-Century Life Sciences , 1992 .

[63]  S. Livingstone,et al.  Handbook of new media : social shaping and consequences of ICTs , 2002 .

[64]  J. Krige How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology , 2006 .

[65]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Reflections on a Work-Oriented Design Project , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[66]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Change Agentry - The Next IS Frontier , 1996, MIS Q..

[67]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Representations and actions: the transformation of work practices with IT use , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[68]  T. Schatzki Peripheral Vision , 2005 .

[69]  Tor Hernes,et al.  Actor-network theory and organizing , 2005 .

[70]  E. Lister The New Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research, and Methods , 2002 .

[71]  Trevor Pinch,et al.  How users matter : The co-construction of users and technologies , 2003 .

[72]  P. Boczkowski The Processes of Adopting Multimedia and Interactivity in Three Online Newsrooms , 2004 .

[73]  G. Pisano,et al.  Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals , 2001 .

[74]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Dynamic Theory of Expertise and Occupational Boundaries in New Technology Implementation: Building on Barley's Study of CT Scanning , 2004 .

[75]  Rob Kling,et al.  Audiences, Narratives, and Human Values in Social Studies of Technology , 1992 .

[76]  D. Pugh,et al.  Operations Technology and Organization Structure: An Empirical Reappraisal , 1969 .

[77]  D. Howcroft Handbook Of Information Systems Research , 2005 .

[78]  A. Hargadon Organizations in Action:Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (Book) , 2003 .

[79]  Wendy Leeds-Hurwitz,et al.  Social Approaches to Communication , 1995 .

[80]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[81]  Paul Barach,et al.  Improving Medical Care: The Use of Simulation Technology , 2001 .

[82]  C. Perrow A FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1967 .

[83]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[84]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  A Comparative Study of Distributed Learning Environments on Learning Outcomes , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[85]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Perspectives on organization design and behavior , 1983 .

[86]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Organizational Technology and Organizational Structure. , 1971 .

[87]  Debra Howcroft,et al.  Paradoxes of participatory practices: the Janus role of the systems developer , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[88]  Jeremy Staum,et al.  Simulation in financial engineering , 2001, Proceeding of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference (Cat. No.01CH37304).

[89]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Management Information Systems: Appreciation and Involvement , 1974 .

[90]  Stephen R Barley The professional, the semi-professional, and the machines : the social ramifications of computer based imaging in radiology , 1984 .

[91]  M. Arnold,et al.  On the phenomenology of technology: the "Janus-faces" of mobile phones , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[92]  L. Suchman Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd edition). , 2007 .

[93]  C. Perrow The organizational context of human factors engineering. , 1983, Administrative science quarterly.

[94]  Michele H. Jackson,et al.  The Social Construction of Technology in Studies of the Workplace , 2002 .

[95]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[96]  Rajiv Kishore,et al.  Outsourcing Success: Psychological Contract Perspective , 2007, AMCIS.

[97]  Neil Pollock,et al.  When Is a Work-Around? Conflict and Negotiation in Computer Systems Development , 2005 .

[98]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[99]  R. Rice,et al.  New Media and Organizational Structuring , 2001 .

[100]  Paul M. Leonardi ORGANIZING TECHNOLOGY: TOWARD A THEORY OF SOCIOMATERIAL IMBRICATION. , 2008 .

[101]  Michael I. Barrett,et al.  Negotiating ICT development and use: The case of a telemedicine system in the healthcare region of Crete , 2006, Inf. Organ..

[102]  James Austin Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts: by Bruno Latour and Steve Woolgar. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, 1979. , 1982 .

[103]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Technochange management: using IT to drive organizational change , 2004, J. Inf. Technol..

[104]  N. Oudshoorn,et al.  How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology (Inside Technology) , 2003 .

[105]  Karin D. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Introduction: Emerging Principles in Social Studies of Science , 1983 .

[106]  E. Romanelli,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1992 .

[107]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[108]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[109]  Jeremy Staum,et al.  Option pricing: simulation in financial engineering , 2001, WSC '01.

[110]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .

[111]  Jerry Fjermestad,et al.  Electronic Commerce Customer Relationship Management: A Research Agenda , 2003, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[112]  Edgar H. Schein,et al.  Conceptual Scheme , 2020 .

[113]  Pauline V. Smith,et al.  Management and Technology , 2008 .

[114]  James L. McKenney,et al.  Social Context and Interaction in Ongoing Computer-Supported Management Groups , 1995 .

[115]  William Rogers,et al.  Enriching asynchronous learning networks through the provision of virtual collaborative learning spaces: a research pilot , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[116]  R. Fox,et al.  Technological Change: Methods and Themes in the History of Technology , 1995 .