Investigation of the Effect of Using Fe + Pure Water Nanofluid on Thermal Performance in a Two Phase Closed Thermosyphon

Heat is a type of energy that is used in many applications and can be easily converted into other types of energy. In this study, a performance analysis was carried out by using Fe + Pure water nanofluid in place of pure water in a two phase closed thermosyphon, which has a wide place in practice due to its simple structure. In the study, a copper thermosyphon with a length of 1 m, diameter of 14 mm and wall thickness of 1 mm was used. Experiments were performed with both pure water and nanofluid to make a comparison. To observe the performance of system in different operating conditions, the experiments were carried out at 3 different heating power (150, 300, 450 W) and 3 different coolant flow rates (3, 6, 9 g/s). In all experimental conditions, Fe + Pure water nanofluid had better results than pure water. The highest efficiency value was found to be 77.9% in the experiment using Fe + Pure water nanofluid, performed at 150 W power and 9 g/s water flow rate. When pure water was used in this experiment, the efficiency value was obtained as 67.7% and the improvement rate was 15%. The highest improvement rate was obtained as 50.3% in the experiment conducted at 450 W heating power and 3 g/s coolant flow rate. The use of nanofluid has also reduced the thermal resistance of the thermosyphon. The highest rate of decrease in thermal resistances was obtained as 56.7% in the experiment performed at 150 W heating power and 3 g/s coolant flow rate. Keywords

[1]  Raid J. Hassiba,et al.  Application of nanofluids for enhanced waste heat recovery: A review , 2021 .

[2]  A. Sözen,et al.  Upgrading of the Performance of an Air-to-Air Heat Exchanger Using Graphene/Water Nanofluid , 2021, International Journal of Thermophysics.

[3]  M. Sheremet,et al.  A two-phase closed thermosyphon operated with nanofluids for solar energy collectors: Thermodynamic modeling and entropy generation analysis , 2020 .

[4]  B. Suresh kumar,et al.  Investigation on thermophysical properties and heat transfer performance of heat pipe charged with binary mixture based ZnO-MgO hybrid nanofluids , 2020 .

[5]  Erdem Çiftçi AlN/Saf Su Nanoakışkanının Isı Borusu Performans Parametreleri Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Deneysel Olarak Araştırılması , 2020 .

[6]  G. Kumaresan,et al.  Performance analysis of thermosyphon heat pipe using aluminum oxide nanofluid under various angles of inclination , 2020 .

[7]  A. Noghrehabadi,et al.  Experimental investigation of the effect of nanofluids on the thermal resistance of a thermosiphon L-shape heat pipe at different angles , 2020 .

[8]  B. Herrera,et al.  Influence of filling ratio on the thermal performance and efficiency of a thermosyphon operating with Al2O3-water based nanofluids , 2020 .

[9]  I. Ceylan,et al.  Performance analysis of using CuO-Methanol nanofluid in a hybrid system with concentrated air collector and vacuum tube heat pipe , 2019, Energy Conversion and Management.

[10]  M. Koç,et al.  A comprehensive review on synthesis, stability, thermophysical properties, and characterization of nanofluids , 2019, Powder Technology.

[11]  Ahmet Ozsoy,et al.  Thermal performance of a thermosyphon heat pipe evacuated tube solar collector using silver-water nanofluid for commercial applications , 2018, Renewable Energy.

[12]  A. Sözen,et al.  Experimental comparison of Triton X-100 and sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate surfactants on thermal performance of TiO2–deionized water nanofluid in a thermosiphon , 2018 .

[13]  Clemens Forman,et al.  Estimating the global waste heat potential , 2016 .

[14]  K. Wasewar,et al.  Heat transfer study on concentric tube heat exchanger using TiO2–water based nanofluid , 2014 .

[15]  M. Afrand,et al.  Hybrid Nanofluids for Convection Heat Transfer , 2020 .

[16]  N. Alagappan,et al.  Performance of Two Phase Copper Thermosyphon Operated with Cerium IV Oxide and Iron II, III Oxide Nano Fluid using Box-Behnken Design , 2020 .