User-Oriented Model to Support Funding Decisions in Pavement Management

A new choice model for corrective road maintenance work based on an economic evaluation of users’ expectations and perceptions about road quality is proposed. Because uncertainty affects human subjective perception processes, the model uses fuzzy sets to deal with this kind of uncertainty. Accordingly, the international roughness index was first fuzzified by combining users’ perceptions about pavement conditions with ranges of speeds for four different categories of rural roads. These fuzzy values were then used to calculate vehicle operating costs and freeflow speed. The latter can be considered a function of the international roughness index and the law enforcement factor. To calculate this factor, a fuzzy inference system was set up. Vehicle operating costs and free-flow speed, as well as the value of time, were then used to calculate the travel cost perceived by users. The model finds, through fuzzy maximization of the difference between perceived travel costs before and after interventions, the best allocation of the available budget for a rural road network. In other words, the results suggest the extent of interventions on specific road sections. An application to a real network shows how the proposed model may be used.

[1]  Susan L. Tighe,et al.  Analytic Hierarchy Process as a Tool for Infrastructure Management , 2006 .

[2]  Joseph L. Schofer,et al.  Trend curve optimal control model for highway pavement maintenance: Case study and evaluation , 1994 .

[3]  Eddie Yein Juin Chou,et al.  Development of Speed-Related Ride Quality Thresholds Using International Roughness Index , 2006 .

[4]  Sue McNeil,et al.  Asset Management and Pavement Management: Using Common Elements to Maximize Overall Benefits , 2001 .

[5]  Weng Tat Chan,et al.  Constraint handling methods in pavement maintenance programming , 2001 .

[6]  Tien Fang Fwa,et al.  Highway Routine Maintenance Programming at Network Level , 1988 .

[7]  Michael W. Sayers,et al.  Estimation of Rideability by Analyzing Longitudinal Road Profile , 1996 .

[8]  J. M. Worm,et al.  Model based decision support for planning of road maintenance , 1996 .

[9]  A Loizos,et al.  Road roughness measured by profilograph in relation to user's perception and the need for repair: a case study , 2002 .

[10]  Foad Farid,et al.  RESOURCE-CONSTRAINED CAPITAL BUDGETING MODEL FOR BRIDGE MAINTENANCE, REHABILITATION, AND REPLACEMENT , 1990 .

[11]  Samer Madanat,et al.  A steady-state solution for the optimal pavement resurfacing problem , 2002 .

[12]  F Mannering,et al.  A STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH DRIVER-PERCEIVED ROAD ROUGHNESS ON URBAN HIGHWAYS , 2002 .

[13]  Weng Tat Chan,et al.  PRIORITY RATING OF HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE NEEDS BY NEURAL NETWORKS , 1993 .

[14]  Ping Ji,et al.  Selecting the best alternative based on life-cycle cost distributions of alternatives , 2004 .

[15]  菅野 道夫,et al.  Industrial applications of fuzzy control , 1985 .

[16]  P. C. Curtayne,et al.  Management of pavement rehabilitation , 1989 .

[17]  Pasquale Colonna,et al.  A NOVEL APPROACH TO THE ROAD MAINTENANCE PLANNING , BASED ON THE POSSIBILITY THEORY , 2003 .

[18]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  Statistical Modeling of User Perceptions of Infrastructure Condition: Application to the Case of Highway Roughness , 2006 .

[19]  Wade D. Cook,et al.  Goal Programming and Financial Planning Models for Highway Rehabilitation , 1984 .

[20]  T D Gillespie,et al.  GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING AND CALIBRATING ROAD ROUGHNESS MEASUREMENTS , 1986 .

[21]  Weng Tat Chan,et al.  ROAD-MAINTENANCE PLANNING USING GENETIC ALGORITHMS. II: ANALYSIS , 1994 .

[22]  Mark A. Turnquist,et al.  DYNAMIC MODEL FOR SCHEDULING MAINTENANCE OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES , 1985 .

[23]  T. Friesz,et al.  A model of optimal transport maintenance with demand responsiveness , 1979 .

[24]  H. Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications , 1993 .

[25]  M. G. Iskander Comparison of fuzzy numbers using possibility programming: Comments and new concepts , 2002 .

[26]  Koji Tsunokawa,et al.  OPTIMAL MAINTENANCE STRATEGIES FOR BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTS: A CASE STUDY IN VIETNAM USING HDM-4 WITH GRADIENT METHODS , 2005 .

[27]  T D Gillespie,et al.  THE INTERNATIONAL ROAD ROUGHNESS EXPERIMENT: A BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING A STANDARD SCALE FOR ROAD ROUGHNESS MEASUREMENTS , 1986 .

[28]  Y. Ouyang,et al.  Optimal scheduling of rehabilitation activities for multiple pavement facilities: exact and approximate solutions , 2004 .

[29]  Ebrahim H. Mamdani,et al.  An Experiment in Linguistic Synthesis with a Fuzzy Logic Controller , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[30]  Tien Fang Fwa,et al.  OPTIMAL PROGRAMMING BY GENETIC ALGORITHMS FOR PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT , 1994 .

[31]  Erwin Köhler,et al.  ANALYSIS OF PAVEMENT SERVICEABILITY FOR THE AASHTO DESIGN METHOD: THE CHILEAN CASE , 2003 .

[32]  Weng Tat Chan,et al.  ROAD-MAINTENANCE PLANNING USING GENETIC ALGORITHMS.. , 1994 .

[33]  K. Tomsovic,et al.  Optimizing Maintenance Resources in Distribution Systems with Limited Information , .

[34]  Samer Madanat,et al.  Model Uncertainty and the Management of a System of Infrastructure Facilities , 2005 .

[35]  Michael J Markow,et al.  OPTIMAL REHABILITATION FREQUENCIES FOR HIGHWAY PAVEMENTS , 1985 .

[36]  George J. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy sets, uncertainty and information , 1988 .

[37]  Timothy L. Jacobs,et al.  Optimal long term scheduling of bridge deck replacement and rehabilitation , 1992 .

[38]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..