CONCEPTS & SYNTHESIS EMPHASIZING NEW IDEAS TO STIMULATE RESEARCH IN ECOLOGY

Connectivity among populations and habitats is important for a wide range of ecological processes. Understanding, preserving, and restoring connectivity in complex landscapes requires connectivity models and metrics that are reliable, efficient, and process based. We introduce a new class of ecological connectivity models based in electrical circuit theory. Although they have been applied in other disciplines, circuit-theoretic connectivity models are new to ecology. They offer distinct advantages over common analytic connectivity models, including a theoretical basis in random walk theory and an ability to evaluate contributions of multiple dispersal pathways. Resistance, current, and voltage calculated across graphs or raster grids can be related to ecological processes (such as individual movement and gene flow) that occur across large population networks or landscapes. Efficient algorithms can quickly solve networks with millions of nodes, or landscapes with millions of raster cells. Here we review basic circuit theory, discuss relationships between circuit and random walk theories, and describe applications in ecology, evolution, and conservation. We provide examples of how circuit models can be used to predict movement patterns and fates of random walkers in complex landscapes and to identify important habitat patches and movement corridors for conservation planning.

[1]  M. Randic,et al.  Resistance distance , 1993 .

[2]  B. Danielson,et al.  Spatially Explicit Population Models: Current Forms and Future Uses , 1995 .

[3]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Detecting Critical Scales in Fragmented Landscapes , 1997 .

[4]  Carlo Ricotta,et al.  Quantifying the network connectivity of landscape mosaics: a graph-theoretical approach , 2000 .

[5]  T. Ricketts The Matrix Matters: Effective Isolation in Fragmented Landscapes , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[6]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  SIMPLE CONNECTIVITY MEASURES IN SPATIAL ECOLOGY , 2002 .

[7]  Rebecca A. Efroymson,et al.  A Practical Map-Analysis Tool for Detecting Potential Dispersal Corridors , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[8]  Justin M. Calabrese,et al.  A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics , 2004 .

[9]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  HABITAT-SPECIFIC MOVEMENT PARAMETERS ESTIMATED USING MARK–RECAPTURE DATA AND A DIFFUSION MODEL , 2004 .

[10]  Prabhakar Raghavan,et al.  The electrical resistance of a graph captures its commute and cover times , 2005, computational complexity.

[11]  Jane Elith,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis for Regional‐Scale Reserve Selection , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[12]  Justin M. Calabrese,et al.  Connectivity Conservation: Quantifying connectivity: balancing metric performance with data requirements , 2006 .

[13]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Connectivity Conservation: Introduction: evaluating and quantifying the conservation dividends of connectivity , 2006 .

[14]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  The Boundary‐Quality Penalty: a Quantitative Method for Approximating Species Responses to Fragmentation in Reserve Selection , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[15]  Dean L Urban,et al.  Graph theory as a proxy for spatially explicit population models in conservation planning. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[16]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  Patterns of abundance and movement in relation to landscape structure: a study of a common scarab (Canthon cyanellus cyanellus) in Southern Mexico , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[17]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Minimizing Effective Resistance of a Graph , 2008, SIAM Rev..

[18]  Paul Beier,et al.  Forks in the Road: Choices in Procedures for Designing Wildland Linkages , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[19]  Ding Jing-yu,et al.  Random Walks and Electric Networks Theory , 2010 .