Real‐time quantification of T  2* changes using multiecho planar imaging and numerical methods

Conventional approaches to quantify whole brain T  2* maps use nonlinear regression with intensive computational requirements that therefore likely limit quantitative T  2* mapping for real‐time applications. To overcome these limitations an alternative method, NumART  2* (NUMerical Algorithm for Real‐time T  2* mapping) that directly calculates T  2* by a linear combination of images obtained at three or more different echo times was developed. NumART  2* , linear least‐squares, and nonlinear regression techniques were applied to multiecho planar images of the human brain and to simulated data. Although NumART  2* may overestimate T  2* , it yields comparable values to regression techniques in cortical and subcortical areas, with only moderate deviations for echo spacings between 18 and 40 ms. NumART  2* , like linear regression, requires 2% of the computational time needed for nonlinear regression and compares favorably with linear regression due to its higher precision. The use of NumART  2* for continuous on‐line T  2* mapping in real time fMRI studies is shown. Magn Reson Med 48:877–882, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  E C Wong,et al.  Processing strategies for time‐course data sets in functional mri of the human brain , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  D. Tank,et al.  4 Tesla gradient recalled echo characteristics of photic stimulation‐induced signal changes in the human primary visual cortex , 1993 .

[3]  J. Frahm,et al.  Cerebral blood oxygenation in rat brain during hypoxic hypoxia. Quantitative MRI of effective transverse relaxation rates , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  R S Balaban,et al.  Comparison of EPI gradient‐echo contrast changes in cat brain caused by respiratory challenges with direct simultaneous evaluation of cerebral oxygenation via a cranial window , 1994, NMR in biomedicine.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[6]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[7]  William F. Eddyy,et al.  Improved image registration by using fourier interpolation , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Experimental determination of the BOLD field strength dependence in vessels and tissue , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  J Hennig,et al.  Functional Imaging by I0‐ and T2* ‐parameter mapping using multi‐image EPI , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  J. Reichenbach,et al.  High-resolution, multiple gradient-echo functional MRI at 1.5 T. , 1999, Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

[11]  M. Hoehn,et al.  Gradient echo time dependence and quantitative parameter maps for somatosensory activation in rats at 7 T , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  S. Posse,et al.  Enhancement of BOLD‐contrast sensitivity by single‐shot multi‐echo functional MR imaging , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  R W Cox,et al.  Real‐time 3D image registration for functional MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  E Moser,et al.  Functional MRI of the human motor cortex using single-shot, multiple gradient-echo spiral imaging. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[15]  N. Ramsey,et al.  Multi-Echo PRESTO: T2* mapping for 3D fMR1 , 2000 .

[16]  T. Ernst,et al.  Biexponential modeling of multigradient‐echo MRI data of the brain , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Thomas Eickermann,et al.  A new approach to measure single‐event related brain activity using real‐time fMRI: Feasibility of sensory, motor, and higher cognitive tasks , 2001, Human brain mapping.