How to Make IT Work:: Cognitive Perspectives for Better Information Technologies Performance

The successful implementation of new information technologies depends on the beliefs and expectations of both managers and workers. Consequently, a new information technology may enable higher productivity in one social setting while limiting or even reducing productivity within another milieu. We present a new concept called “Cognitive Knowledge Identity” (CKI) that distinguishes between three types of systems in organizations: Tayloristic, Expert, and Innovation. This cognitive aspect of organizational culture operates as a basic social system framework that governs the effective use of IT in organizations. This paper presents practical aspects for managers that lead for better Information Technology performance.

[1]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  An Exploration of Impact of Cognitive Elaboration on Learning in ISD Projects , 2014, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[2]  F. Herzberg,et al.  The motivation to work , 1960 .

[3]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Measuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated? , 2000, CHI.

[4]  C. Marlene Fiol,et al.  Managing Culture as a Competitive Resource: An Identity-Based View of Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[5]  E. O'Connor,et al.  Gaining Advanced Manufacturing Technologies' Benefits: The Roles of Organization Design and Culture , 1992 .

[6]  Celia V. Harquail,et al.  Organizational images and member identification. , 1994 .

[7]  D. Foray,et al.  The Economics of Codification and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 1997 .

[8]  Renzo Gobbin,et al.  The Role of Cultural Fitness in User Resistance to Information Technology Tools , 1998, Interact. Comput..

[9]  Terri L. Griffith.  Cross-Cultural and Cognitive Issues in the Implementation of New Technology: Focus on Group Support Systems and Bulgaria , 1998, Interact. Comput..

[10]  Lynne P. Cooper,et al.  Knowledge Reuse for Innovation , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[11]  S. Newell,et al.  Managing Knowledge Work , 2002 .

[12]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  What's your strategy for managing knowledge? , 1999, Harvard business review.

[13]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[14]  Paul A. David,et al.  The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness , 2000 .

[15]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[16]  J. Dutton,et al.  Keeping An Eye on the Mirror: Image and Identity In Organizational Adaptation , 1991 .

[17]  Stuart M. Shieber,et al.  A Simple Reconstruction of GPSG , 1986, COLING.

[18]  Wilhelm Weisweber.  Using constraints in a constructive version of GPSG , 1988, COLING.

[19]  Sue Newell,et al.  Dangerous liaisons? Component-based development and organizational subcultures , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[20]  W. Orlikowski.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[21]  Eric Sven Ristad,et al.  Computational Complexity of Current GPSG Theory , 1986, ACL.

[22]  N. Jimmieson,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Culture and Reshaping Capabilities on Change Implementation Success: The Mediating Role of Readiness for Change , 2005 .

[23]  Marcel Dischinger,et al.  Characterizing residential broadband networks , 2007, IMC '07.

[24]  S. Newell,et al.  From global knowledge management to internal electronic fences: contradictory outcomes of intranet development , 2001 .

[25]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .