Multi-sectoral action to promote psychological wellbeing: Theorising the role of place-based policy.

ISSUES ADDRESSED Several national governments are showing interest in policies to promote wellbeing. One common strategy is to devise systems to measure indictors of wellbeing, presuming that governments act on what they measure. This article will argue instead that formation of multisectoral policies to promote psychological wellbeing requires a different kind of theoretical and evidentiary basis. METHODS The article integrates ideas from literature on wellbeing, health in all policies, political science, mental health promotion, and social determinants of health to make a case for place-based policy as the central feature of multi-sectoral policy for psychological wellbeing. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION I argue that the required theoretical foundation for policy action on psychological wellbeing lies with understanding certain basic functions of human social psychology including the role of stress arousal. I then draw on policy theory to propose three steps to translate this theoretical understanding of psychological wellbeing into practicable, multi-sectoral policies. Step one is concerned with adopting a thoroughly revised conception of psychological wellbeing as a policy problem. Step two involves uptake of a theory of change in policy, grounded on recognition of essential social conditions required to promote psychological wellbeing. Proceeding from these, I will argue that a necessary (but not sufficient) third step is to implement place-based strategies involving government-community partnerships, to generate essential conditions for psychological wellbeing on a universal basis. Finally, I examine implications of the proposed approach for current theory and practice in mental health promotion policy. CONCLUSIONS Place-based policy is foundational for effective multi-sectoral policy to promote psychological wellbeing. SO WHAT?: Governments aiming to promote psychological wellbeing should position place-based policy at the centre of their strategies.

[1]  Matthew Fisher,et al.  Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Theories of Wellbeing and Their Suitability for Wellbeing Policy , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[2]  S. Pearson,et al.  Changes in antidepressant use in Australia: A nationwide analysis (2015–2021) , 2022, The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry.

[3]  F. Baum,et al.  Implementing Universal and Targeted Policies for Health Equity: Lessons From Australia , 2021, International journal of health policy and management.

[4]  F. Baum,et al.  Stakeholder perceptions of policy implementation for Indigenous health and cultural safety: A study of Australia's ‘Closing the Gap’ policies , 2021 .

[5]  F. Baum,et al.  How well do Australian government urban planning policies respond to the social determinants of health and health equity? , 2020 .

[6]  T. Mackean,et al.  Theories of Indigenous and non-Indigenous wellbeing in Australian health policies. , 2020, Health promotion international.

[7]  Matt Fisher A theory of public wellbeing , 2019, BMC Public Health.

[8]  F. Baum,et al.  Intersectoral action on SDH and equity in Australian health policy , 2017, Health promotion international.

[9]  T. Brugha,et al.  Has increased provision of treatment reduced the prevalence of common mental disorders? Review of the evidence from four countries , 2017, World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association.

[10]  J. Stovall The Social Determinants of Mental Health , 2016 .

[11]  Y. Paradies Colonisation, racism and indigenous health , 2016 .

[12]  T. Moore Using place-based approaches to strengthen child wellbeing , 2014 .

[13]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Social Relationships and Health: The Toxic Effects of Perceived Social Isolation. , 2014, Social and personality psychology compass.

[14]  F. Baum,et al.  Ottawa 25 years on: a more radical agenda for health equity is still required. , 2011, Health promotion international.

[15]  D. Hunter,et al.  The Challenge of Joined-Up Government in Tackling Health Inequalities , 2011 .

[16]  E. Ollila Health in All Policies: From rhetoric to action , 2011, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[17]  P. Thoits,et al.  Stress and Health: Major Findings and Policy Implications , 2010, Journal of health and social behavior.

[18]  F. Baum,et al.  Changes not for the fainthearted: reorienting health care systems toward health equity through action on the social determinants of health. , 2009, American journal of public health.

[19]  G. Chrousos Stress and disorders of the stress system , 2009, Nature Reviews Endocrinology.

[20]  V. Glover,et al.  Antenatal maternal stress and long-term effects on child neurodevelopment: how and why? , 2007, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[21]  Vikram Patel,et al.  Mental health promotion works: a review , 2005, Promotion & education.

[22]  E. Epel,et al.  Accelerated telomere shortening in response to life stress. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  S. Dickerson,et al.  Acute stressors and cortisol responses: a theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  OUP accepted manuscript , 2021, Health Promotion International.

[25]  N. Milio Making healthy public policy; developing the science by learning the art: an ecological framework for policy studies. , 1991, WHO regional publications. European series.