Characterizing a confidence space for discrete event timings for fault monitoring using discrete sensing and actuation signals

Many manufacturing systems are controlled using discrete sensors and actuators. The changes in values of the corresponding control I/O signals are events. The timing and sequencing relationships of these events can be used to determine whether a system is operating as expected, or whether a fault may have occurred. We present a method of learning intervened timing relationships using observations from a correctly operating system. The sample statistics of the observation characteristic of correct system operation are used to create a confidence space of possible timing relationships of the underlying system. Any timing relationship used as a specification of correct observation for fault monitoring will result in some level of false alarms and missed detections among all the possible relationships in the confidence space; the timing relationships can be chosen to minimize the worst case total of the false alarm and missed detection costs over the confidence space. Simulations are used to evaluate the performance of the chosen timing relationship over a range of perturbed systems.

[1]  Thomas H. Wonnacott,et al.  Introductory Statistics , 2007, Technometrics.

[2]  Lawrence E. Holloway,et al.  Distributed fault monitoring in manufacturing systems using concurrent discrete-event observations , 1994 .

[3]  Sujeet Chand Decentralized monitoring and diagnosis of manufacturing processes , 1993, Proceedings ISAD 93: International Symposium on Autonomous Decentralized Systems.

[4]  J. Berger Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis , 1988 .

[5]  Mark G. Karpovsky,et al.  Spectral Techniques and Fault Detection , 1985 .

[6]  Charles Rubin,et al.  Fundamentals of statistical quality control , 1970 .

[7]  Gregory Provan,et al.  Modeling and diagnosis of timed discrete event systems-a factory automation example , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No.97CH36041).

[8]  Lawrence E. Holloway,et al.  Template languages for fault monitoring of timed discrete event processes , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[9]  A. Willsky,et al.  Observability of discrete event dynamic systems , 1990 .

[10]  Sujeet Chand,et al.  Time templates for discrete event fault monitoring in manufacturing systems , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 American Control Conference - ACC '94.

[11]  Lawrence E. Holloway,et al.  Learning of time templates from system observation , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference - ACC'95.

[12]  Maurice G. Kendall,et al.  The advanced theory of statistics , 1945 .

[13]  Jean Florine,et al.  Firmware transitional logic for on-line monitoring and control , 1986, 1986 25th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[14]  L. F. Pau Failure Diagnosis and Performance Monitoring , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[15]  N. Viswanadham,et al.  Fault Detection and Diagnosis of Automated Manufacturing Systems , 1988 .

[16]  V. S. Srinivasan,et al.  Fault detection/monitoring using time Petri nets , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[17]  S. Humble Failure diagnosis and performance monitoring: L. F. Pau , 1982, Autom..

[18]  Elijah Kannatey-Asibu,et al.  Tool Failure Monitoring in Turning by Pattern Recognition Analysis of AE Signals , 1988 .

[19]  Janos J. Gertler,et al.  Analytical Redundancy Methods in Fault Detection and Isolation , 1991 .