Aesthetic, Functional and Conceptual Provocation in Research Through Design

Recently within HCI, design approaches have appeared, which deviate from traditional ones. Among them critical design introduces deliberate provocations in order to challenge established perceptions and practices. We have engaged ourselves with this design approach out of interest in understanding how to use provocation in research through design. Towards this end, we report on a field study with four families that used an aesthetically, functionally and conceptually provocative future probe. The purpose of the probe was to challenge existing energy consuming practices through provocation and make its users reflect on them. The paper describes how all three provocative aspects were addressed, and our findings demonstrate how they were experienced in the real world, and how they impacted our research through design approach. We conclude by presenting reflections on how to design provocations, and reflections on the impact of provocations for research through design in general.

[1]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Ghost driver: A field study investigating the interaction between pedestrians and driverless vehicles , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[2]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  The drift table: designing for ludic engagement , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[3]  Alan Borning,et al.  Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems , 2020, The Ethics of Information Technologies.

[4]  Eric C. Larson,et al.  The design and evaluation of prototype eco-feedback displays for fixture-level water usage data , 2012, CHI.

[5]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI , 2010, CHI.

[6]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Sustainably unpersuaded: how persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability , 2012, CHI.

[7]  Cecilia Katzeff,et al.  Exploring Sustainable Practices in Workplace Settings through Visualizing Electricity Consumption , 2013, TCHI.

[8]  Jesper Kjeldskov,et al.  Eco-Forecasting for Domestic Electricity Use , 2015, CHI.

[9]  Jared Donovan,et al.  Provotypes for participatory innovation , 2012, DIS '12.

[10]  Jesper Kjeldskov,et al.  HeatDial: Beyond User Scheduling in Eco-Interaction , 2016, NordiCHI.

[11]  Yolande A. A. Strengers,et al.  Designing eco-feedback systems for everyday life , 2011, CHI.

[12]  Allison Druin,et al.  Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families , 2003, CHI '03.

[13]  D. Kellner.  Critical Theory , 2006 .

[14]  William W. Gaver.  What should we expect from research through design? , 2012, CHI.

[15]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  Understanding domestic energy consumption through interactive visualisation: a field study , 2012, UbiComp.

[16]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation , 2006, DIS '06.

[17]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on practice-oriented approaches to sustainable HCI , 2013, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[18]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The Nature of Design Practice and Implications for Interaction Design Research , 2008 .

[19]  Eric Paulos,et al.  The local energy indicator: designing for wind and solar energy systems in the home , 2012, DIS '12.

[20]  Johan Redström,et al.  Switch! Energy Ecologies in Everyday Life , 2008 .

[21]  Pieter M. A. Desmet,et al.  Provocative design for unprovocative designers: Strategies for triggering personal dilemmas , 2016 .

[22]  James A. Landay,et al.  UbiGreen: investigating a mobile tool for tracking and supporting green transportation habits , 2009, CHI.

[23]  Andy Boucher,et al.  Power to the people: dynamic energy management through communal cooperation , 2012, DIS '12.

[24]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  It is too Hot: An In-Situ Study of Three Designs for Heating , 2016, CHI.

[25]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Materializing energy , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[26]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  Doing the laundry with agents: a field trial of a future smart energy system in the home , 2014, CHI.

[27]  Cecilia Katzeff,et al.  Watt-Lite: energy statistics made tangible , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[28]  Vivian Loftness,et al.  Beyond Eco-Feedback: Adding Online Manual and Automated Controls to Promote Workplace Sustainability , 2015, CHI.

[29]  Yolande A. A. Strengers,et al.  Designing through value constellations , 2015, Interactions.

[30]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Reflective HCI: towards a critical technical practice , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[31]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Reading critical designs: supporting reasoned interpretations of critical design , 2014, CHI.

[32]  Anton Gustafsson,et al.  The power-aware cord: energy awareness through ambient information display , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[33]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Reflective design , 2005, Critical Computing.

[34]  Oksana Zelenko,et al.  Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design , 2007 .

[35]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Critical design and critical theory: the challenge of designing for provocation , 2012, DIS '12.

[36]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Counterfunctional things: exploring possibilities in designing digital limitations , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[37]  Anthony Dunne,et al.  Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects , 2001 .

[38]  Preben Mogensen,et al.  Towards a Provotyping Approach in Systems Development , 1992, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[40]  Ming-Chuen Chuang,et al.  Exploration in Emotion and Visual Information Uncertainty of Websites in Culture Relations , 2008 .

[41]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  What is "critical" about critical design? , 2013, CHI.

[42]  Tobie Kerridge,et al.  Energy Babble: Mixing Environmentally-Oriented Internet Content to Engage Community Groups , 2015, CHI.

[43]  Peter Dalsgaard,et al.  Research in and through design: an interaction design research approach , 2010 .

[44]  Reflective Hci,et al.  Towards a Critical Technical Practice , 2004 .

[45]  Gerd Kortuem,et al.  Conversations with my washing machine: an in-the-wild study of demand shifting with self-generated energy , 2014, UbiComp.

[46]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Analyzing critical designs: categories, distinctions, and canons of exemplars , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[47]  Preben Holst Mogensen,et al.  Challenging Practice: an approach to Cooperative Analysis , 1994 .

[48]  Harry Hochheiser,et al.  HCI and Societal Issues: A Framework for Engagement , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[49]  Daniel Fallman,et al.  Design-oriented human-computer interaction , 2003, CHI '03.

[50]  Jan Gulliksen.  Human computer interaction and societal impact: can HCI influence public policy making IT politics? , 2014, IHC.

[51]  Jesper Kjeldskov,et al.  Using mobile phones to support sustainability: a field study of residential electricity consumption , 2012, CHI.

[52]  Paul Dourish,et al.  HCI and environmental sustainability: the politics of design and the design of politics , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[53]  I. A. Richards,et al.  Practical Criticism: a Study of Literary Judgment , 1956, Nature.

[54]  Anthony Dunne,et al.  Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming , 2013 .

[55]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Expanding and Refining Design and Criticality in HCI , 2015, CHI.

[56]  Carl DiSalvo,et al.  Adversarial Design , 2012 .

[57]  Johan Redström,et al.  Slow Technology – Designing for Reflection , 2001, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[58]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI , 2007, CHI.

[59]  Mark Blythe,et al.  The digital music box: using cultural and critical theory to inform design , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[60]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Alternatives: exploring information appliances through conceptual design proposals , 2000, CHI.