Understanding User Requirements for the Design of a Home-Based Stroke Rehabilitation System

Limitations following stroke make it one of the leading causes of disability. The current medical pathway provides intensive care in the acute stages, but rehabilitation services are commonly discontinued after one year. While written home exercise programs are regularly prescribed at the time of discharge, compliancy is an issue. The goal of this study was to inform the design of a home-based portable rehabilitation system based on feedback from individuals with stroke and clinicians. A main component under consideration is the type and format of information feedback provided to the user, as this is hypothesized to support compliance with the rehabilitation program. From a series of focus groups and usability testing, a set of design requirements for the hardware and software were constructed. Essential features mentioned for the feedback interface included: task completion time, quality of movement, a selection of exercises, goal tracking, and a display of historical data.

[1]  Iona Novak,et al.  Effective home programme intervention for adults: a systematic review , 2011, Clinical rehabilitation.

[2]  K. Furie,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2008, Circulation.

[3]  Bruce H. Dobkin,et al.  International Randomized Clinical Trial, Stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation With Reinforcement of Walking Speed (SIRROWS), Improves Outcomes , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[4]  Gabriele Wulf,et al.  Self-Controlled Feedback Is Effective if It Is Based on the Learner's Performance , 2005, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[5]  S. Wolf,et al.  Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients , 1989, Experimental Neurology.

[6]  Understanding the dimensions of home for people returning home post stroke rehabilitation , 2016 .

[7]  Ifeoma Nwogu,et al.  Reported use of technology in stroke rehabilitation by physical and occupational therapists , 2018, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[8]  Michael J. Carter,et al.  Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner’s performance: a replication and extension of Chiviacowsky and Wulf (2005) , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[9]  Laura Cortesi,et al.  Epidemiologic Trends in Hospitalized Ischemic Stroke from 2002 to 2010: Results from a Large Italian Population-Based Study. , 2015, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[10]  M. Tomizuka,et al.  Clinical impact of gait training enhanced with visual kinematic biofeedback: Patients with Parkinson’s disease and patients stable post stroke , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  M. Lewek,et al.  Individuals Poststroke Do Not Perceive Their Spatiotemporal Gait Asymmetries as Abnormal , 2015, Physical Therapy.

[12]  V. Penhune,et al.  Dual-task performance reveals increased involvement of executive control in fine motor sequencing in healthy aging. , 2010, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[13]  Gitendra Uswatte,et al.  The EXCITE Stroke Trial: Comparing Early and Delayed Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy , 2010, Stroke.

[14]  Gabriele Wulf,et al.  Feedback After Good Trials Enhances Learning , 2007, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[15]  Birgitta Langhammer,et al.  Bobath or Motor Relearning Programme? A follow-up one and four years post stroke , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[16]  Tim Eakin,et al.  The effects of age on precision pinch force control across five days of practice. , 2012, Current aging science.