Measuring green productivity of country: A generlized metafrontier Malmquist productivity index approach

This paper measures environmental productivity in 70 countries over the period 1981–2007. Differences in green (environmental) productivity growth across countries under distinct country specific production frontier are measured using directional distance function model, which incorporates desirable output (GDP) and undesirable output (CO2 emissions). The metafrontier which envelops the two country groups, developed countries and developing countries, are estimated using balanced panel data for the sample countries over the study period. A parametric method is used to compute technical efficiency change, technical change, and scale efficiency change, which aggregate to the generalized metafrontier Malmquist productivity index. The overall results indicated the two country groups operated under distinct stochastic production frontiers and therefore used different production technologies. It is found that developing countries achieved higher growth in their average environmental productivity relative to the metafrontier. Thus the results coincide with the convergence growth theory.

[1]  Alexander Vaninsky,et al.  Prospective national and regional environmental performance: Boundary estimations using a combined data envelopment – stochastic frontier analysis approach , 2010 .

[2]  A. Marshall Principles of Economics , .

[3]  G. Battese,et al.  Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios , 2008 .

[4]  P. Romer Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  G. Battese,et al.  A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data , 1995 .

[6]  Walter Diewert,et al.  Exact and superlative index numbers , 1976 .

[7]  Russell Pittman,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons with Undesirable Outputs , 1983 .

[8]  Subal C. Kumbhakar,et al.  Stochastic frontier analysis , 2000 .

[9]  R. Solow A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth , 1956 .

[10]  Luis Orea,et al.  Parametric Decomposition of a Generalized Malmquist Productivity Index , 2002 .

[11]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Technological Change and the Environment , 2000 .

[12]  G. Battese,et al.  A Metafrontier Production Function for Estimation of Technical Efficiencies and Technology Gaps for Firms Operating Under Different Technologies , 2004 .

[13]  Di Jin,et al.  Environmental Regulations and Technological Change in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry: Rethinking the Porter Hypothesis , 2002 .

[14]  Guanghui Zhou,et al.  A study of carbon dioxide emissions performance of China's transport sector , 2013 .

[15]  Surender Kumar,et al.  Measurement of environmental efficiency and productivity: a cross-country analysis , 2009, Environment and Development Economics.

[16]  C. Lovell,et al.  On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model , 1982 .

[17]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1982 .

[18]  S. Kumbhakar,et al.  A Generalized Production Frontier Approach for Estimating Determinants of Inefficiency in U.S. Dairy Farms , 1991 .

[19]  C. Barros,et al.  Productivity assessment of Angola's oil blocks , 2009 .

[20]  Per-Olov Marklund,et al.  What is driving the EU Burden-sharing Agreement: efficiency or equity? , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[21]  Gary Koop,et al.  Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: A structural approach , 1998 .

[22]  Subhash C. Ray,et al.  Measuring Scale Efficiency from a Translog Production Function , 1999 .

[23]  Scott E. Atkinson,et al.  Bayesian measurement of productivity and efficiency in the presence of undesirable outputs: crediting electric utilities for reducing air pollution , 2005 .

[24]  Shunsuke Managi,et al.  Energy Price Induced and Exogenous Technological Changes: Assessing Economic and Environmental Outcomes , 2008 .

[25]  B. Ewing,et al.  Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States , 2007 .

[26]  Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,et al.  An analysis of energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in countries of the Middle East and North Africa , 2005 .

[27]  Mark J. Roberts,et al.  Environmental Regulations and Productivity Growth: The Case of Fossil-fueled Electric Power Generation , 1983, Journal of Political Economy.

[28]  Surender Kumar,et al.  Measuring environmental efficiency of industry: a case study of thermal power generation in India , 2007 .

[29]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[30]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .

[31]  Ku‐Hsieh Chen,et al.  Analysis of regional productivity growth in China: A generalized metafrontier MPI approach , 2009, China Economic Review.

[32]  M. Cropper,et al.  Environmental Economics: A Survey , 1992 .

[33]  R. Lucas On the Mechanics of Economic Development , 1988 .

[34]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  An empirical analysis of energy efficiency in China's iron and steel sector , 2007 .

[35]  Michael G. Pollitt,et al.  The necessity of distinguishing weak and strong disposability among undesirable outputs in DEA: Environmental performance of Chinese coal-fired power plants , 2010 .

[36]  Chunhua Wang,et al.  Decomposing energy productivity change: A distance function approach , 2007 .

[37]  N. Mankiw,et al.  Principles of Economics , 1871 .

[38]  William L. Weber,et al.  Characteristics of a Polluting Technology: Theory and Practice , 2002 .

[39]  M. Pesaran A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross Section Dependence , 2003 .

[40]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach , 1995 .

[41]  Atakelty Hailu,et al.  Environmentally Sensitive Productivity Analysis of the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry, 1959-1994: An Input Distance Function Approach , 2000 .

[42]  W. Baumol Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: What the Long-run Data Show , 1985 .

[43]  C. Lovell,et al.  Econometric Estimation of Technical and Environmental Efficiency: An Application to Dutch Dairy Farms , 1999 .

[44]  Seyed Farid Ghaderi,et al.  Measuring efficiency and productivity change in power electric generation management companies by us , 2011 .

[45]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions , 2007 .

[46]  Surender Kumar,et al.  Environmentally Sensitive Productivity Growth: A Global Analysis Using Malmquist-Luenberger Index , 2006 .

[47]  R. Pittman Issue in pollution control: interplant cost differences and economies of scale. , 1981 .

[48]  T. Tuttle,et al.  Green productivity: moving the agenda , 2007 .

[49]  R. Färe,et al.  Accounting for Air Pollution Emissions in Measures of State Manufacturing Productivity Growth , 2001 .

[50]  Peter Schmidt,et al.  A Monte Carlo study of estimators of stochastic frontier production functions , 1980 .

[51]  A. Lansink,et al.  Measurement of Dynamic Efficiency: A Directional Distance Function Parametric Approach , 2011 .

[52]  S. Managi,et al.  Trade-induced technological change : analyzing economic and environmental outcomes , 2009 .

[53]  B. Balk Scale Efficiency and Productivity Change , 2001 .

[54]  K. Arrow The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .