Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding Poses via a Combination of Induced Fit Docking and Metadynamics Simulations.

Ligand docking is a widely used tool for lead discovery and binding mode prediction based drug discovery. The greatest challenges in docking occur when the receptor significantly reorganizes upon small molecule binding, thereby requiring an induced fit docking (IFD) approach in which the receptor is allowed to move in order to bind to the ligand optimally. IFD methods have had some success but suffer from a lack of reliability. Complementing IFD with all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) is a straightforward solution in principle but not in practice due to the severe time scale limitations of MD. Here we introduce a metadynamics plus IFD strategy for accurate and reliable prediction of the structures of protein-ligand complexes at a practically useful computational cost. Our strategy allows treating this problem in full atomistic detail and in a computationally efficient manner and enhances the predictive power of IFD methods. We significantly increase the accuracy of the underlying IFD protocol across a large data set comprising 42 different ligand-receptor systems. We expect this approach to be of significant value in computationally driven drug design.

[1]  M. Parrinello,et al.  A time-independent free energy estimator for metadynamics. , 2015, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[2]  R. Friesner,et al.  New insights about HERG blockade obtained from protein modeling, potential energy mapping, and docking studies. , 2006, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[3]  Michele Parrinello,et al.  Enhancing Important Fluctuations: Rare Events and Metadynamics from a Conceptual Viewpoint. , 2016, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[4]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[5]  A perturbative solution to metadynamics ordinary differential equation. , 2015, The Journal of chemical physics.

[6]  Hege S. Beard,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[7]  R. Friesner,et al.  Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[8]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Funnel metadynamics as accurate binding free-energy method , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Jennifer L. Knight,et al.  OPLS3: A Force Field Providing Broad Coverage of Drug-like Small Molecules and Proteins. , 2016, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[10]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  A. Laio,et al.  Escaping free-energy minima , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Metadynamics with Adaptive Gaussians. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[13]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  Flexible CDOCKER: Development and application of a pseudo‐explicit structure‐based docking method within CHARMM , 2014, J. Comput. Chem..

[14]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  Z. Deng,et al.  Structural interaction fingerprint (SIFt): a novel method for analyzing three-dimensional protein-ligand binding interactions. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[16]  Jennifer L. Knight,et al.  Accurate and reliable prediction of relative ligand binding potency in prospective drug discovery by way of a modern free-energy calculation protocol and force field. , 2015, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[17]  Francesco Luigi Gervasio,et al.  Exploring complex protein-ligand recognition mechanisms with coarse metadynamics. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[18]  Eric T. Kim,et al.  How does a drug molecule find its target binding site? , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[19]  Michele Parrinello,et al.  Well-tempered metadynamics converges asymptotically. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[20]  B. Berne,et al.  Spectral gap optimization of order parameters for sampling complex molecular systems , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Well-tempered metadynamics: a smoothly converging and tunable free-energy method. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[22]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Sampling protein motion and solvent effect during ligand binding , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.