Model of Trade-Off between Overlapping and Rework of Design Activities

AbstractAn effective and well-known technique for earlier completion of construction projects is to overlap the project activities that normally would be performed in sequence. Overlapping, often called fast-tracking, is inherently risky because it increases uncertainties and can result in more changes and rework. In order to gain maximum advantages from early project completion, a trade-off between benefits and losses of activity overlapping is required. In this paper, a new model has been developed to (1) explain in detail the mechanism and characteristics of design activity overlapping and (2) formulate and discuss design activity overlapping time-cost trade-off. A qualitative research methodology including interviews and focus groups with experts was used to generate and refine the model. This model contributes to the body of knowledge of construction management by demonstrating (1) how to analyze multipath networks through introducing the multi-predecessor effect and (2) how to analyze concurrent ove...

[1]  David E. Gray,et al.  Doing Research in the Real World , 2004 .

[2]  Janaka Y. Ruwanpura,et al.  Activity Overlapping Assessment in Construction, Oil, and Gas Projects , 2010 .

[3]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, Third edition , 1994 .

[4]  Reza H. Ahmadi,et al.  Concurrent Crashing and Overlapping in Product Development , 2004, Oper. Res..

[5]  Reza H. Ahmadi,et al.  Time-Cost Trade-Offs in Overlapped Product Development , 2000, Oper. Res..

[6]  J. Creswell.  Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[7]  Keith R. Molenaar,et al.  Strategies for overlapping dependent design activities , 2006 .

[8]  Raad Yahya Qassim,et al.  Project Acceleration via Activity Crashing, Overlapping, and Substitution , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[9]  L. Phillips.  A theory of requisite decision models , 1984 .

[10]  Lawrence D. Phillips,et al.  Requisite Decision Modelling: A Case Study , 1982 .

[11]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Accelerating Product Development by the Exchange of Preliminary Product Design Information , 1995 .

[12]  Keith R. Molenaar,et al.  Concurrent Engineering Approach to Reducing Design Delivery Time , 2005 .

[13]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Exchanging Preliminary Information in Concurrent Engineering: Alternative Coordination Strategies , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[14]  Evan L. Porteus,et al.  Optimal Timing of Reviews in Concurrent Design for Manufacturability , 1995 .

[15]  Fabio Nicolò,et al.  A concurrent engineering decision model: Management of the project activities information flows , 1998 .

[16]  Viswanathan V Krishnan,et al.  Managing the simultaneous execution of coupled phases in concurrent product development , 1996 .

[17]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Communication and Uncertainty in Concurrent Engineering , 1998 .

[18]  Keith R. Molenaar,et al.  Sensitivity of Construction Activities under Design Uncertainty , 2009 .

[19]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  A simulation-based process model for managing complex design projects , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[20]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  A Task Contingent Model of Work-Unit Structure. , 1974 .

[21]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  DYNAMIC PLANNING AND CONTROL METHODOLOGY FOR DESIGN/BUILD FAST-TRACK CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS , 2001 .

[22]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[23]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  A Model-Based Framework to Overlap Product Development Activities , 1997 .