Applicability issues of the real-valued negative selection algorithms

The paper examines various applicability issues of the negative selection algorithms (NSA). Recently, concerns were raised on the use of NSAs, especially those using real-valued representation. In this paper, we argued that many reported issues are either due to improper usage of the method or general difficulties which are not specific to negative selection algorithms. On the contrary, the experiments with synthetic data and well-known real-world data show that NSAs have great flexibility to balance between efficiency and robustness, and to accommodate domain-oriented elements in the method, e.g. various distance measures. It is to be noted that all methods are not suitable for all datasets and data representation plays a major role.

[1]  Zhou Ji,et al.  Real-Valued Negative Selection Algorithm with Variable-Sized Detectors , 2004, GECCO.

[2]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  A Comparative Study of Real-Valued Negative Selection to Statistical Anomaly Detection Techniques , 2005, ICARIS.

[3]  Antonio Fernández,et al.  One-class texture classifier in the CCR feature space , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[4]  David W. Corne,et al.  An Investigation of the Negative Selection Algorithm for Fault Detection in Refrigeration Systems , 2003, ICARIS.

[5]  Fabio A. González,et al.  Anomaly Detection Using Real-Valued Negative Selection , 2003, Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines.

[6]  Simon M. Garrett,et al.  How Do We Evaluate Artificial Immune Systems? , 2005, Evolutionary Computation.

[7]  Fabio A. González,et al.  An immunity-based technique to characterize intrusions in computer networks , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[8]  Young-Il Kim,et al.  Complementary Dual Detectors for Effective Classification , 2003, ICARIS.

[9]  Zhou Ji,et al.  A BOUNDARY-AWARE NEGATIVE SELECTION ALGORITHM , 2005 .

[10]  Gilbert L. Peterson,et al.  An evolutionary algorithm to generate hyper-ellipsoid detectors for negative selection , 2005, GECCO '05.

[11]  David M. J. Tax,et al.  One-class classification , 2001 .

[12]  Fabio A. González,et al.  The Effect of Binary Matching Rules in Negative Selection , 2003, GECCO.

[13]  Alan S. Perelson,et al.  Self-nonself discrimination in a computer , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy.

[14]  Emma Hart,et al.  Not All Balls Are Round: An Investigation of Alternative Recognition-Region Shapes , 2005, ICARIS.

[15]  大樹 若山 SCIS & ISIS 2004 (Joint 2nd International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems and 5th International Symposium on Advanced Intelligent Systems)報告 , 2004 .

[16]  Alex Alves Freitas,et al.  Revisiting the Foundations of Artificial Immune Systems: A Problem-Oriented Perspective , 2003, ICARIS.

[17]  Fabio A. González,et al.  A Randomized Real-Valued Negative Selection Algorithm , 2003, ICARIS.

[18]  Zhou Ji,et al.  Estimating the detector coverage in a negative selection algorithm , 2005, GECCO '05.

[19]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Is negative selection appropriate for anomaly detection? , 2005, GECCO '05.