Cascades and Cognitive State: Focused Attention Incurs Subcritical Dynamics

The analysis of neuronal avalanches supports the hypothesis that the human cortex operates with critical neural dynamics. Here, we investigate the relationship between cascades of activity in electroencephalogram data, cognitive state, and reaction time in humans using a multimodal approach. We recruited 18 healthy volunteers for the acquisition of simultaneous electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging during both rest and during a visuomotor cognitive task. We compared distributions of electroencephalogram-derived cascades to reference power laws for task and rest conditions. We then explored the large-scale spatial correspondence of these cascades in the simultaneously acquired functional magnetic resonance imaging data. Furthermore, we investigated whether individual variability in reaction times is associated with the amount of deviation from power law form. We found that while resting state cascades are associated with approximate power law form, the task state is associated with subcritical dynamics. Furthermore, we found that electroencephalogram cascades are related to blood oxygen level-dependent activation, predominantly in sensorimotor brain regions. Finally, we found that decreased reaction times during the task condition are associated with increased proximity to power law form of cascade distributions. These findings suggest that the resting state is associated with near-critical dynamics, in which a high dynamic range and a large repertoire of brain states may be advantageous. In contrast, a focused cognitive task induces subcritical dynamics, which is associated with a lower dynamic range, which in turn may reduce elements of interference affecting task performance.

[1]  E. Lettich,et al.  Modified nomenclature for the "10%" electrode system. , 1988, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[2]  E. Lettich,et al.  Modified Nomenclature for the “10%” Electrode System1 , 1988 .

[3]  Louis Lemieux,et al.  Identification of EEG Events in the MR Scanner: The Problem of Pulse Artifact and a Method for Its Subtraction , 1998, NeuroImage.

[4]  D. Turcotte,et al.  Self-organized criticality , 1999 .

[5]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[6]  C. Rorden,et al.  Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. , 2000, Behavioural neurology.

[7]  Robert Turner,et al.  A Method for Removing Imaging Artifact from Continuous EEG Recorded during Functional MRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[8]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[9]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[10]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[12]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[13]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[14]  John M. Beggs,et al.  Neuronal Avalanches in Neocortical Circuits , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[16]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[17]  John M Beggs,et al.  Critical branching captures activity in living neural networks and maximizes the number of metastable States. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[18]  O. Kinouchi,et al.  Optimal dynamical range of excitable networks at criticality , 2006, q-bio/0601037.

[19]  Woodrow L. Shew,et al.  Neuronal Avalanches Imply Maximum Dynamic Range in Cortical Networks at Criticality , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[21]  O. Sporns,et al.  Key role of coupling, delay, and noise in resting brain fluctuations , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[23]  P. Federico Simultaneous Eeg and Fmri: Recording, Analysis and Application , 2010, Neurology.

[24]  Hilde T. Juvodden,et al.  Mal-Adaptation of Event-Related EEG Responses Preceding Performance Errors , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[25]  Andrew M. Clark,et al.  Stimulus onset quenches neural variability: a widespread cortical phenomenon , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  Ernst Strüngmann Forum,et al.  Dynamic coordination in the brain : from neurons to mind , 2010 .

[27]  Woodrow L. Shew,et al.  Predicting criticality and dynamic range in complex networks: effects of topology. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[28]  Robert Leech,et al.  Default mode network functional and structural connectivity after traumatic brain injury. , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  Timothy E. Ham,et al.  Default Mode Network Connectivity Predicts Sustained Attention Deficits after Traumatic Brain Injury , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  John M. Beggs,et al.  Being Critical of Criticality in the Brain , 2012, Front. Physio..

[31]  John M. Beggs,et al.  Universal critical dynamics in high resolution neuronal avalanche data. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[32]  Woodrow L. Shew,et al.  Maximal Variability of Phase Synchrony in Cortical Networks with Neuronal Avalanches , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Rodrigo M. Braga,et al.  Echoes of the Brain within the Posterior Cingulate Cortex , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Woodrow L. Shew,et al.  The Functional Benefits of Criticality in the Cortex , 2013, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[35]  M. Rosenberg,et al.  In the zone or zoning out? Tracking behavioral and neural fluctuations during sustained attention. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Dynamic cooperation and competition between brain systems during cognitive control , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  O. Shriki,et al.  Fading Signatures of Critical Brain Dynamics during Sustained Wakefulness in Humans , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Biyu J. He Spontaneous and Task-Evoked Brain Activity Negatively Interact , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Matthijs Verhage,et al.  A solution to dependency: using multilevel analysis to accommodate nested data , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  Peter J Hellyer,et al.  The Control of Global Brain Dynamics: Opposing Actions of Frontoparietal Control and Default Mode Networks on Attention , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Woodrow L. Shew,et al.  Voltage Imaging of Waking Mouse Cortex Reveals Emergence of Critical Neuronal Dynamics , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Biyu J. He Scale-free brain activity: past, present, and future , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  D. Sharp,et al.  The role of the posterior cingulate cortex in cognition and disease. , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[44]  Michael Esterman,et al.  Intrinsic Fluctuations in Sustained Attention and Distractor Processing , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.