The Interplay of Power and Trust in Platform Ecosystems of the Enterprise Application Software Industry

In recent years, the formerly oligopolistic Enterprise Application Software (EAS) industry began to disintegrate into focal inter-firm networks with one huge, powerful, and multi-national plat-form vendor as the center, surrounded by hundreds or even thousands of small, niche players that act as complementors. From a theoretical point of view, these platform ecosystems may be governed by two organizing principles - trust and power. However, it is neither from a practical nor from a theoretical perspective clear, how trust and power relate to each other, i.e. whether they act as complements or substitutes. This study tries to elaborate our understanding of the relationship of trust and power by exploring their interplay using multi-dimensional conceptual-izations of trust and power, and by investigating potential dynamics in this interplay over the course of a partnership. Based on an exploratory multiple-case study of seven dyadic partner-ships between four platform vendors, and seven complementors, we find six different patterns of how trust and power interact over time. These patterns bear important implications for the suc-cessful management of partnerships between platform vendors and complementors, and clarify the theoretical debate surrounding the relationship of trust and power.

[1]  Thomas Alexander Fischer,et al.  Substitutes or Complements? A Framework for Investigating the Dynamic Interplay of IS Outsourcing Governance Mechanisms , 2011, ICIS.

[2]  Niels G. Noorderhaven,et al.  Levels of inter-organizational trust : Conceptualization and measurement , 2006 .

[3]  Slinger Jansen,et al.  Business Network Management as a Survival Strategy: A Tale of Two Software Ecosystems , 2009, IWSECO@ICSR.

[4]  Marianne W. Lewis Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide , 2000 .

[5]  Christel Lane,et al.  Co-operation in Inter-Firm Relations in Britain and Germany: The Role of Social Institutions , 1997 .

[6]  Justin W. Webb,et al.  A multi‐theoretic perspective on trust and power in strategic supply chains , 2007 .

[7]  Thomas L. Huber,et al.  Resolving Tensions in Hub-and-Spoke Networks of the Enterprise Application Software Industry - An Exploratory Case Study , 2010, AMCIS.

[8]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[9]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[10]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[11]  Annabelle Gawer,et al.  Platforms, Markets and Innovation: An Introduction , 2009 .

[12]  Peng Huang,et al.  Co-Creation of Value in a Platform Ecosystem: The Case of Enterprise Software , 2011, MIS Q..

[13]  Tiziana Casciaro,et al.  Power Imbalance, Mutual Dependence, and Constraint Absorption: A Closer Look at Resource Dependence Theory , 2005 .

[14]  Guido Möllering,et al.  Trust: Reason, Routine, Reflexivity , 2006 .

[15]  B. Looy,et al.  Toward An Integrative Perspective on Alliance Governance: Connecting Contract Design, Trust Dynamics, and Contract Application , 2008 .

[16]  P. Sztompka Trust: A Sociological Theory , 2000 .

[17]  David G. Messerschmitt,et al.  Software Ecosystem: Understanding an Indispensable Technology and Industry , 2003 .

[18]  B. Pentland Building Process Theory with Narrative: from Description to Explanation , 1999 .

[19]  Peng Huang,et al.  Appropriability Mechanisms and the Platform Partnership Decision: Evidence from Enterprise Software , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Linda D. Molm RISK AND POWER USE: CONSTRAINTS ON THE USE OF COERCION IN EXCHANGE* , 1997 .

[21]  Padmal Vitharana Risks and challenges of component-based software development , 2003, CACM.

[22]  A. Huberman,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook , 1994 .

[23]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[24]  R. Emerson Power-Dependence Relations , 1962, Power in Modern Societies.

[25]  Jens Dibbern,et al.  Why Do Complementors Participate? An Analysis of Partnership Networks in the Enterprise Software Industry , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[26]  A. Diekmann Empirische Sozialforschung: Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendungen , 2007 .

[27]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  Emerging Electronic Partnerships: Antecedents and Dimensions of EDI Use from the Supplier's Perspective , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  Exploring Value Cocreation in Relationships Between an ERP Vendor and its Partners: A Revelatory Case Study , 2012, MIS Q..

[29]  JaspersonJon Sean,et al.  Review: power and information technology research , 2002 .

[30]  Bala Iyer,et al.  Analyzing Complementarities Using Software Stacks for Software Industry Acquisitions , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Sharon Alvarez,et al.  Trust and Its Alternatives , 2003 .

[32]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[33]  Thomas Alexander Fischer,et al.  A Process Model of Complementarity and Substitution of Contractual and Relational Governance in IS Outsourcing , 2013, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Paul J. Hart,et al.  Power and Trust: Critical Factors in the Adoption and Use of Electronic Data Interchange , 1997 .

[35]  R. Bachmann Trust, Power and Control in Trans-Organizational Relations , 2001 .

[36]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Power and Information Technology Research: A Metatriangulation Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[37]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[38]  A. Pettigrew Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[39]  J. Jarillo On strategic networks , 1988 .

[40]  J. Gillon,et al.  Group dynamics , 1996 .

[41]  K. Weick,et al.  Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization , 1990 .