The RAVEN code has been under development at the Idaho National Laboratory since 2012. Its main goal is to create a multi-purpose platform for the deploying of all the capabilities needed for Probabilistic Risk Assessment, uncertainty quantification, data mining analysis and optimization studies. RAVEN is currently equipped with three different sampling categories: Forward samplers (Monte Carlo, Latin Hyper Cube, Stratified, Grid Sampler, Factorials, etc.), Adaptive Samplers (Limit Surface search, Adaptive Polynomial Chaos, etc.) and Dynamic Event Tree (DET) samplers (Deterministic and Adaptive Dynamic Event Trees). The main subject of this document is to report the activities that have been done in order to: start the migration of the RAVEN/RELAP-7 control logic system into MOOSE, and develop advanced dynamic sampling capabilities based on the Dynamic Event Tree approach. In order to provide to all MOOSE-based applications a control logic capability, in this Fiscal Year an initial migration activity has been initiated, moving the control logic system, designed for RELAP-7 by the RAVEN team, into the MOOSE framework. In this document, a brief explanation of what has been done is going to be reported. The second and most important subject of this report is about the development of a Dynamic Event Treemore » (DET) sampler named “Hybrid Dynamic Event Tree” (HDET) and its Adaptive variant “Adaptive Hybrid Dynamic Event Tree” (AHDET). As other authors have already reported, among the different types of uncertainties, it is possible to discern two principle types: aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. The classical Dynamic Event Tree is in charge of treating the first class (aleatory) uncertainties; the dependence of the probabilistic risk assessment and analysis on the epistemic uncertainties are treated by an initial Monte Carlo sampling (MCDET). From each Monte Carlo sample, a DET analysis is run (in total, N trees). The Monte Carlo employs a pre-sampling of the input space characterized by epistemic uncertainties. The consequent Dynamic Event Tree performs the exploration of the aleatory space. In the RAVEN code, a more general approach has been developed, not limiting the exploration of the epistemic space through a Monte Carlo method but using all the forward sampling strategies RAVEN currently employs. The user can combine a Latin Hyper Cube, Grid, Stratified and Monte Carlo sampling in order to explore the epistemic space, without any limitation. From this pre-sampling, the Dynamic Event Tree sampler starts its aleatory space exploration. As reported by the authors, the Dynamic Event Tree is a good fit to develop a goal-oriented sampling strategy. The DET is used to drive a Limit Surface search. The methodology that has been developed by the authors last year, performs a Limit Surface search in the aleatory space only. This report documents how this approach has been extended in order to consider the epistemic space interacting with the Hybrid Dynamic Event Tree methodology.« less
[1]
Benjamin S. Kirk,et al.
Library for Parallel Adaptive Mesh Refinement / Coarsening Simulations
,
2006
.
[2]
Andrea Alfonsi,et al.
Performing Probabilistic Risk Assessment Through RAVEN
,
2013
.
[3]
Andrea Alfonsi,et al.
PHISICS TOOLKIT: MULTI-REACTOR TRANSMUTATION ANALYSIS UTILITY - MRTAU
,
2012
.
[4]
Andrea Alfonsi,et al.
REACTOR ANALYSIS AND VIRTUAL CONTROL ENVIRONMENT (RAVEN) FY12 REPORT
,
2012
.
[5]
Cristian Rabiti,et al.
MATHEMATICAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE ANALYSIS OF DYNAMC STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS WITH THE RAVEN CODE
,
2013
.
[6]
Andrea Alfonsi,et al.
RAVEN and Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment: Software overview
,
2014
.
[7]
William Gropp,et al.
Efficient Management of Parallelism in Object-Oriented Numerical Software Libraries
,
1997,
SciTools.
[8]
M. Kloos,et al.
MCDET: A Probabilistic Dynamics Method Combining Monte Carlo Simulation with the Discrete Dynamic Event Tree Approach
,
2006
.
[9]
Adaptive Dynamic Event Tree in RAVEN code
,
2014
.
[10]
Andrea Alfonsi,et al.
RAVEN: Dynamic Event Tree Approach Level III Milestone
,
2013
.
[11]
Cristian Rabiti,et al.
Risk-Informed Safety Margins Characterization (RISMC) Pathway Technical Program Plan
,
2017
.
[12]
Haihua Zhao,et al.
RELAP-7 Level 2 Milestone Report: Demonstration of a Steady State Single Phase PWR Simulation with RELAP-7
,
2012
.
[13]
Derek Gaston,et al.
MOOSE: A parallel computational framework for coupled systems of nonlinear equations
,
2009
.
[14]
Andrea Alfonsi,et al.
RAVEN AS A TOOL FOR DYNAMIC PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT: SOFTWARE OVERVIEW
,
2013
.
[15]
Gaël Varoquaux,et al.
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
,
2011,
J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[16]
Andrea Alfonsi,et al.
Deployment and Overview of RAVEN capabilities for
,
2013
.
[17]
D. Keyes,et al.
Jacobian-free Newton-Krylov methods: a survey of approaches and applications
,
2004
.