Visual Optimality and Stability Analysis of 3DCT Scan Positions

Industrial cone-beam X-Ray computed tomography (CT) systems often face problems due to artifacts caused by a bad placement of the specimen on the rotary plate. This paper presents a visual-analysis tool for CT systems, which provides a simulation-based preview and estimates artifacts and deviations of a specimen's placement using the corresponding 3D geometrical surface model as input. The presented tool identifies potentially good or bad placements of a specimen and regions of a specimen, which cause the major portion of artefacts. The tool can be used for a preliminary analysis of the specimen before CT scanning, in order to determine the optimal way of placing the object. The analysis includes: penetration lengths, placement stability and an investigation in Radon space. Novel visualization techniques are applied to the simulation data. A stability widget is presented for determining the placement parameters' robustness. The performance and the comparison of results provided by the tool compared with real world data is demonstrated using two specimens.

[1]  H. Tuy.  AN INVERSION FORMULA FOR CONE-BEAM RECONSTRUCTION* , 1983 .

[2]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .

[3]  Bruce D. Smith.  Image Reconstruction from Cone-Beam Projections: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions and Reconstruction Methods , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Mateu Sbert,et al.  Viewpoint Selection using Viewpoint Entropy , 2001, VMV.

[5]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Computed Tomography: Principles, Design, Artifacts, and Recent Advances, Fourth Edition , 2022 .

[6]  Mateu Sbert,et al.  Automatic View Selection Using Viewpoint Entropy and its Application to Image‐Based Modelling , 2003, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[7]  Melanie Tory,et al.  Comparing ExoVis, Orientation Icon, and In-Place 3D Visualization Techniques , 2003, Graphics Interface.

[8]  J. Tabary,et al.  Combination of high resolution analytically computed uncollided flux images with low resolution Monte Carlo computed scattered flux images , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[9]  Julia F. Barrett,et al.  Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[10]  Yuriko Takeshima,et al.  A feature-driven approach to locating optimal viewpoints for volume visualization , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..

[11]  William J. Schroeder,et al.  The Visualization Toolkit , 2005, The Visualization Handbook.

[12]  Han-Wei Shen,et al.  View selection for volume rendering , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..

[13]  Frank Nielsen,et al.  Volume catcher , 2005, I3D '05.

[14]  Nicolas Freud,et al.  A hybrid approach to simulate multiple photon scattering in X-ray imaging , 2005 .

[15]  Carsten Bellon,et al.  Monte Carlo radiographic model with CAD-based geometry description , 2006 .

[16]  Uladzimir Samadurau,et al.  McRay - A Monte Carlo Model Coupled to CAD for Radiation Techniques , 2006 .

[17]  Mateu Sbert,et al.  Importance-Driven Focus of Attention , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[18]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  Stackless KD‐Tree Traversal for High Performance GPU Ray Tracing , 2007, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[19]  Bernhard Preim,et al.  Viewpoint Selection for Intervention Planning , 2007, EuroVis.

[20]  Lei Zhu,et al.  An Efficient Estimation Method for Reducing the Axial Intensity Drop in Circular Cone-Beam CT , 2008, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[21]  Christoph Heinzl,et al.  Analysis and Visualization of Industrial CT Data , 2008 .

[22]  M. Mantler,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of projections in computed tomography , 2008, Powder Diffraction.

[23]  Eduard Gröller,et al.  Improvement of X-Ray image acquisition using a GPU based 3 DCT simulation tool , 2009 .

[24]  Eduard Gröller,et al.  Comparative Visualization for Parameter Studies of Dataset Series , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.