Clinical use of stereoscopic X-ray positioning of patients treated with conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE To evaluate accuracy and time requirements of a stereoscopic X-ray-based positioning system in patients receiving conformal radiotherapy to the prostate. METHODS AND MATERIALS Setup errors of the isocenter with regard to the bony pelvis were measured by means of orthogonal verification films and compared to conventional positioning (using skin drawings and lasers) and infrared marker (IR) based positioning in each of 261 treatments. In each direction, the random error represents the standard deviation and the systematic error the absolute value of the mean position. Time measurements were done in 75 treatments. RESULTS Random errors with the X-ray positioning system in the anteroposterior (AP), lateral, and longitudinal direction were (average +/- 1 standard deviation) 2 +/- 0.6 mm, 1.7 +/- 0.6 mm, and 2.4 +/- 0.7 mm. The corresponding values of conventional as well as IR positioning were significantly higher (p < 0.01). Systematic errors for X-ray positioning were 1.1 +/- 1.2 mm AP, 0.6 +/- 0.5 mm laterally, and 1.5 +/- 1.6 mm longitudinally. Conventional and IR marker-based positioning showed significantly larger systematic errors AP and laterally, but longitudinally, the difference was not significant. Depending on the axis looked at, errors of >or=5 mm occurred in 2%-14% of treatments after X-ray positioning, 13%-29% using IR markers, and 28%-53% with conventional positioning. Total linac time for one treatment session was 14 min 51 s +/- 4 min 18 s, half of which was used for the X-ray-assisted positioning procedure. CONCLUSION X-ray-assisted patient positioning significantly improves setup accuracy, at the cost of an increased treatment time.

[1]  A Bel,et al.  High-precision prostate cancer irradiation by clinical application of an offline patient setup verification procedure, using portal imaging. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  William R. Fair,et al.  DOSE ESCALATION WITH THREE-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL RADIATION THERAPY AFFECTS THE OUTCOME IN PROSTATE CANCER , 1998 .

[3]  P. Remeijer,et al.  Set-up verification using portal imaging; review of current clinical practice. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  André Wambersie,et al.  The International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements , 2001, Journal of the ICRU.

[5]  P. Bergström,et al.  High-precision conformal radiotherapy (HPCRT) of prostate cancer--a new technique for exact positioning of the prostate at the time of treatment. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  E. B. Butler,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer with the use of a rectal balloon for prostate immobilization: acute toxicity and dose-volume analysis. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  J Szanto,et al.  A prospective comparison of three systems of patient immobilization for prostate radiotherapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Optimization of conformal radiation treatment of prostate cancer: report of a dose escalation study. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  A. Hanlon,et al.  Late GI and GU complications in the treatment of prostate cancer. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Melvin L. Griem,et al.  Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy , 1994 .

[11]  R. Pötter,et al.  The influence of a rectal balloon tube as internal immobilization device on variations of volumes and dose-volume histograms during treatment course of conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  H Shirato,et al.  Use of an implanted marker and real-time tracking of the marker for the positioning of prostate and bladder cancers. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  A comparison of daily CT localization to a daily ultrasound-based system in prostate cancer. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  G T Chen,et al.  A comparison of four patient immobilization devices in the treatment of prostate cancer patients with three dimensional conformal radiotherapy. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  P. Greer,et al.  Comparison of two methods for anterior-posterior isocenter localization in pelvic radiotherapy using electronic portal imaging. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  Dirk Verellen,et al.  Quality assurance of a system for improved target localization and patient set-up that combines real-time infrared tracking and stereoscopic X-ray imaging. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  G Starkschall,et al.  Preliminary results of a randomized radiotherapy dose-escalation study comparing 70 Gy with 78 Gy for prostate cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  Icru Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy , 1993 .

[19]  Mageras,et al.  Control, Correction, and Modeling of Setup Errors and Organ Motion. , 1995, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[20]  A Pollack,et al.  Complications from radiotherapy dose escalation in prostate cancer: preliminary results of a randomized trial. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  F. V. Heuvel,et al.  Clinical implementation of an objective computer-aided protocol for intervention in intra-treatment correction using electronic portal imaging , 1995 .

[22]  J. Manola,et al.  A practical method to achieve prostate gland immobilization and target verification for daily treatment. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  P. A. Graham,et al.  Patient positioning using detailed three-dimensional surface data for patients undergoing conformal radiation therapy for carcinoma of the prostate: a feasibility study. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  Dirk Verellen,et al.  Initial clinical experience with infrared-reflecting skin markers in the positioning of patients treated by conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  C. Reddy,et al.  Higher than standard radiation doses (> or =72 Gy) with or without androgen deprivation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  L. Gras,et al.  Estimation of the incidence of late bladder and rectum complications after high-dose (70-78 GY) conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer, using dose-volume histograms. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  D Verellen,et al.  Interactive use of on-line portal imaging in pelvic radiation. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.