Impact of building usage and occupancy on energy consumption in Finnish daycare and school buildings

Abstract The facility strategy of the City of Espoo emphasises improvements in the energy efficiency and efficient use of buildings. The design phase of a building is crucial and when the building is in operation, it is crucial to use control systems correctly. Further, in order to encourage relevant efficiency efforts, it is essential to know how to measure energy efficiency in the building operation phase. This requires an understanding of the correlation between building occupancy, space efficiency and energy efficiency. Energy efficiency is typically measured as energy consumption per unit of area kWh/m 2 per annum. The specific energy consumption is an effective way to measure the technical properties of a building and to guide its design but it neglects issues related to building occupancy and space efficiency. This paper explores ways in which building usage and occupancy influences the measured energy consumption in Finnish daycare centres and school buildings. The study adopts existing energy efficiency indicators and introduces a new indicator for building energy efficiency which takes into account both space and occupancy efficiency.

[1]  Constantinos A. Balaras,et al.  Energy consumption and the potential for energy conservation in school buildings in Hellas , 1994 .

[2]  Aapo Huovila,et al.  Building occupancy as an aspect of energy efficiency , 2013 .

[3]  Vincenc Butala,et al.  Energy consumption and potential energy savings in old school buildings , 1999 .

[4]  David Lee,et al.  ENERNET: Studying the dynamic relationship between building occupancy and energy consumption , 2012 .

[5]  Olli Seppänen,et al.  The effect of a redesigned floor plan, occupant density and the quality of indoor climate on the cost of space, productivity and sick leave in an office building–A case study , 2006 .

[6]  D K Milton,et al.  Risk of sick leave associated with outdoor air supply rate, humidification, and occupant complaints. , 2000, Indoor air.

[7]  Stefan Maas,et al.  Field study on the energy consumption of school buildings in Luxembourg , 2014 .

[8]  L. Mølhave,et al.  The right to healthy indoor air. , 2000, Indoor air.

[9]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Life-Cycle Environmental Effects of an Office Building , 2003 .

[10]  A. Dimoudi,et al.  Energy monitoring and conservation potential in school buildings in the C' climatic zone of Greece , 2009 .

[11]  Miimu Airaksinen,et al.  Measured energy consumption of educational buildings in a Finnish city , 2015 .

[12]  M. N. Assimakopoulos,et al.  Using intelligent clustering techniques to classify the energy performance of school buildings , 2007 .

[13]  Manuel Gameiro da Silva,et al.  Energy consumption in schools – A review paper , 2014 .

[14]  Manuel Duarte Pinheiro,et al.  From indicators to strategies: Key Performance Strategies for sustainable energy use in Portuguese school buildings , 2014 .

[15]  William J. Fisk,et al.  Economizer system cost effectiveness: Accounting for the influence of ventilation rate on sick leave , 2003 .

[16]  S. Corgnati,et al.  A method for heating consumption assessment in existing buildings: A field survey concerning 120 Italian schools , 2008 .

[17]  Patxi Hernandez,et al.  Development of energy performance benchmarks and building energy ratings for non-domestic buildings: An example for Irish primary schools , 2008 .

[18]  Miimu Airaksinen.  Energy Use in Day Care Centers and Schools , 2011 .