A geometric singular perturbation approach for planar stationary shock waves

Abstract The non-linear non-equilibrium nature of shock waves in gas dynamics is investigated for the planar case. Along each streamline, the Euler equations with non-equilibrium pressure are reduced to a set of ordinary differential equations defining a slow–fast system, and geometric singular perturbation theory is applied. The proposed theory shows that an orbit on the slow manifold corresponds to the smooth part of the solution to the Euler equation, where non-equilibrium effects are negligible; and a relaxation motion from the unsteady to the steady branch of the slow manifold corresponds to a shock wave, where the flow relaxes from non-equilibrium to equilibrium. Recognizing the shock wave as a fast motion is found to be especially useful for shock wave detection when post-processing experimental measured or numerical calculated flow fields. Various existing shock detection methods can be derived from the proposed theory in a rigorous mathematical manner. The proposed theory provides a new shock detection method based on its non-linear non-equilibrium nature, and may also serve as the theoretical foundation for many popular shock wave detection techniques.

[1]  K. Zumbrun,et al.  Multidimensional viscous shocks II: The small viscosity limit , 2004 .

[2]  Yanni Zeng,et al.  Gas Dynamics in Thermal Nonequilibrium¶and General Hyperbolic Systems¶with Relaxation , 1999 .

[3]  Yan Liu,et al.  Approximate inertial manifolds of Burgers equation approached by nonlinear Galerkin's procedure and its application , 2011 .

[4]  Neil Fenichel Geometric singular perturbation theory for ordinary differential equations , 1979 .

[5]  Kojiro Suzuki,et al.  Shock wave detection in two-dimensional flow based on the theory of characteristics from CFD data , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[6]  Zi-Niu Wu,et al.  Review of shock wave detection method in CFD post-processing , 2013 .

[7]  Jean-Luc Guermond,et al.  Viscous Regularization of the Euler Equations and Entropy Principles , 2012, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[8]  Cheng-Hsiung Hsu,et al.  Inviscid and viscous stationary waves of gas flow through contracting–expanding nozzles , 2010 .

[9]  C. Klein,et al.  Numerical study of shock formation in the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation and dispersive regularizations , 2013, 1304.6513.

[10]  Cheng-Hsiung Hsu,et al.  Viscous Standing Asymptotic States of Isentropic Compressible Flows Through a Nozzle , 2010 .

[11]  Graeme J. Pettet,et al.  Folds, canards and shocks in advection–reaction–diffusion models , 2010 .

[12]  C. J. Greenshields,et al.  The structure of shock waves as a test of Brenner's modifications to the Navier–Stokes equations , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  Richard Courant,et al.  Supersonic Flow And Shock Waves , 1948 .

[14]  John M. Hong,et al.  Existence and uniqueness of generalized stationary waves for viscous gas flow through a nozzle with discontinuous cross section , 2012 .

[15]  K. Zumbrun,et al.  Multidimensional viscous shocks I: Degenerate symmetrizers and long time stability , 2004 .

[16]  Haitao Fan,et al.  A Dynamical Systems Approach to Traveling Wave Solutions for Liquid/Vapor Phase Transition , 2012 .

[17]  HAITAO FAN,et al.  Standing Waves for Phase Transitions in a Spherically Symmetric Nozzle , 2012, SIAM J. Math. Anal..

[18]  A. Kasimov A stationary circular hydraulic jump, the limits of its existence and its gasdynamic analogue , 2008, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  Tai-Ping Liu Hyperbolic conservation laws with relaxation , 1987 .

[20]  P. Szmolyan,et al.  Canards in R3 , 2001 .

[21]  George Keith Batchelor,et al.  An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. , 1969 .

[22]  Robert Haimes,et al.  Shock detection from computational fluid dynamics results , 1999 .

[23]  Hermann Weyl,et al.  Shock waves in arbitrary fluids , 1949 .

[24]  David Gilbarg,et al.  The Existence and Limit Behavior of the One-Dimensional Shock Layer , 1951 .

[25]  J. Hale,et al.  Ordinary Differential Equations , 2019, Fundamentals of Numerical Mathematics for Physicists and Engineers.

[26]  Tatiana G. Elizarova,et al.  Numerical simulation of shock wave structure in nitrogen , 2007 .

[28]  A. Majda Compressible fluid flow and systems of conservation laws in several space variables , 1984 .

[29]  H. Alsmeyer,et al.  Density profiles in argon and nitrogen shock waves measured by the absorption of an electron beam , 1976, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[30]  Masashi Kanamori,et al.  Shock Wave Detection based on the Theory of Characteristics for CFD Results , 2011 .

[31]  K. Zumbrun,et al.  Navier–Stokes regularization of multidimensional Euler shocks , 2006 .

[32]  Hans-Georg Pagendarm,et al.  An Algorithm for Detection and Visualization of Discontinuities in Scientific Data Fields Applied to Flow Data with Shock Waves , 1992 .

[33]  C. Dafermos Hyberbolic Conservation Laws in Continuum Physics , 2000 .

[34]  Michal Feckan,et al.  Global center manifolds in singular systems , 1996 .

[35]  Friedrich Sauvigny Partial Differential Equations 2: Functional Analytic Methods , 2006 .

[36]  Sarah Rothstein,et al.  Waves In Fluids , 2016 .

[37]  Manuel Torrilhon,et al.  Regularized 13-moment equations: shock structure calculations and comparison to Burnett models , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[38]  J. Peraire,et al.  Sub-Cell Shock Capturing for Discontinuous Galerkin Methods , 2006 .