Performance of a New Leadless Implantable Cardiac Monitor in Detecting and Quantifying Atrial Fibrillation Results of the XPECT Trial

Background—Current methods for detecting atrial fibrillation (AF) have limited diagnostic yield. Continuous monitoring with automatic arrhythmia detection and classification may improve detection of symptomatic and asymptomatic AF and subsequent patient treatment. The study purpose was to quantify the performance of the first implantable leadless cardiac monitor (ICM) with dedicated AF detection capabilities. Methods and Results—Patients (n=247) with an implanted ICM (Reveal XT, Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) who were likely to present with paroxysmal AF were selected. A special Holter device stored 46 hours of subcutaneously recorded ECG, ICM markers, and 2 surface ECG leads. The ICM automatic arrhythmia classification was compared with the core laboratory classification of the surface ECG. Of the 206 analyzable Holter recordings collected, 76 (37%) contained at least 1 episode of core laboratory classified AF. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for identifying patients with any AF were 96.1%, 85.4%, 79.3%, and 97.4%, respectively. The AF burden measured with the ICM was very well correlated with the reference value derived from the Holter (Pearson coefficient=0.97). The overall accuracy of the ICM for detecting AF was 98.5%. Conclusions—In this ICM validation study, the dedicated AF detection algorithm reliably detected the presence or absence of AF and the AF burden was accurately quantified. The ICM is a promising new diagnostic and monitoring tool for the clinician to treat AF patients independently of symptoms. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate the clinical benefits of the technology. Clinical Trial Registration—clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT00680927.

[1]  B. Gersh,et al.  Epidemiology and natural history of atrial fibrillation: clinical implications. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  S. Barold,et al.  Diagnosis of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Implanted Pacemakers: Relationship to Symptoms and Other Variables , 2009, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[3]  B. Lüderitz,et al.  Suppression of paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias--results of the SOPAT trial. , 2004, European heart journal.

[4]  A. Capucci,et al.  Presence and Duration of Atrial Fibrillation Detected by Continuous Monitoring: Crucial Implications for the Risk of Thromboembolic Events , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[5]  G. Lip,et al.  Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation on Device Interrogation , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[6]  A. De Simone,et al.  Role of transtelephonic electrocardiographic monitoring in detecting short-term arrhythmia recurrences after radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Robert Safford,et al.  Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation: demographic features and prognostic information from the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study. , 2005, American heart journal.

[8]  W. Kapoor,et al.  Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope. , 2001, European heart journal.

[9]  Theodor Landis,et al.  Usefulness of Ambulatory 7-Day ECG Monitoring for the Detection of Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter After Acute Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack , 2004, Stroke.

[10]  C. Israel,et al.  Long-term risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation as documented by an implantable monitoring device: implications for optimal patient care. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Outcome parameters for trials in atrial fibrillation: recommendations from a consensus conference organized by the German Atrial Fibrillation Competence NETwork and the European Heart Rhythm Association. , 2007, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[12]  Christopher Piorkowski,et al.  Perception of Atrial Fibrillation Before and After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: Relevance of Asymptomatic Arrhythmia Recurrence , 2005, Circulation.

[13]  G. Lip,et al.  Accuracy of diagnosing atrial fibrillation on electrocardiogram by primary care practitioners and interpretative diagnostic software: analysis of data from screening for atrial fibrillation in the elderly (SAFE) trial , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  W. Kapoor,et al.  [Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope. Update 2004. Executive summary]. , 2004, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[15]  E. Aliot,et al.  Indications for the use of diagnostic implantable and external ECG loop recorders. , 2009, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[16]  Stephan Willems,et al.  Early and comprehensive management of atrial fibrillation: proceedings from the 2nd AFNET/EHRA consensus conference on atrial fibrillation entitled 'research perspectives in atrial fibrillation'. , 2009, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[17]  Rose Anne Kenny,et al.  Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope--update 2004. , 2004, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[18]  Silvia G. Priori,et al.  ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the European society of cardiology committee for PRAC , 2006 .

[19]  Massimo Santini,et al.  Monitored atrial fibrillation duration predicts arterial embolic events in patients suffering from bradycardia and atrial fibrillation implanted with antitachycardia pacemakers. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  DenisJabaudon,et al.  Usefulness of Ambulatory 7-Day ECG Monitoring for the Detection of Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter After Acute Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack , 2004 .

[21]  E. Cheek,et al.  Electrophysiological characteristics associated with symptoms in pacemaker patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation , 2009, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[22]  T. Meinertz,et al.  Event‐Recorder Monitoring in the Diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation in Symptomatic Patients: Subanalysis of the SOPAT Trial , 2006, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[23]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[24]  A. Rabinstein,et al.  Atrial fibrillation detected by mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry in cryptogenic TIA or stroke , 2009 .

[25]  G. Lamas,et al.  Atrial High Rate Episodes Detected by Pacemaker Diagnostics Predict Death and Stroke: Report of the Atrial Diagnostics Ancillary Study of the MOde Selection Trial (MOST) , 2003, Circulation.

[26]  Rahul Mehra,et al.  Comparison of continuous versus intermittent monitoring of atrial arrhythmias. , 2006, Heart rhythm.

[27]  Christopher Piorkowski,et al.  :Influence of the duration of Holter monitoring on the detection of arrhythmia recurrences after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: implications for patient follow-up. , 2010, International journal of cardiology.

[28]  Shantanu Sarkar,et al.  A Detector for a Chronic Implantable Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Monitor , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.