The Codon-Degeneracy Model of Molecular Evolution

Abstract. Mitochondrial genetic codons can be categorized by four patterns of nucleotide-site degeneracy based on varying combinations of twofold- or nondegenerate sites at first codon positions and twofold- or fourfold-degenerate sites at third codon positions. Herein, a model of molecular evolution is introduced that uses these patterns to calculate expected substitution frequencies for each codon position and substitution type relative to overall number of synonymous or nonsynonymous substitutions. Regions of the pocket gopher cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) and cytochrome b (cyt-b) genes are analyzed using this model. Chi-square distributions are used to produce relative goodness-of-fit (GF) scores for measuring the difference between substitution frequencies predicted by the codon-degeneracy model (CDM), and frequencies inferred using a well-supported phylogenetic tree of closely related species. The GF scores for expected and observed synonymous (GFsyn= 0.429, p= 0.807) and nonsynonymous (GFns= 2.309, p= 0.679) substitution frequencies resulted in a failure to reject the CDM as a null hypothesis for the molecular evolution of COI and cyt-b in pocket gophers. Alternative tree topologies and calculations of transition bias for these data result in higher GF scores.

[1]  Roderic D. M. Page,et al.  TEMPORAL CONGRUENCE REVISITED : COMPARISON OF MITOCHONDRIAL DNA SEQUENCE DIVERGENCE IN COSPECIATING POCKET GOPHERS AND THEIR CHEWING LICE , 1996 .

[2]  M. O. Dayhoff,et al.  Atlas of protein sequence and structure , 1965 .

[3]  R. Wayne,et al.  Molecular systematics of the Canidae. , 1997, Systematic biology.

[4]  R. Grantham.  Amino Acid Difference Formula to Help Explain Protein Evolution , 1974, Science.

[5]  J. Bennetzen,et al.  Codon selection in yeast. , 1982, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[6]  W. Fitch,et al.  Construction of phylogenetic trees. , 1967, Science.

[7]  Mark S. Hafner,et al.  Cospeciation in host-parasite assemblages: Comparative analysis of rates of evolution and timing of , 1990 .

[8]  T. Ikemura.  Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. , 1985, Molecular biology and evolution.

[9]  S. Nadler,et al.  Disparate rates of molecular evolution in cospeciating hosts and parasites. , 1994, Science.

[10]  M. Nei,et al.  Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. , 1986, Molecular biology and evolution.

[11]  T. Jukes,et al.  The neutral theory of molecular evolution. , 2000, Genetics.

[12]  W. Fitch.  Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins. , 1970, Systematic zoology.

[13]  N. Saitou,et al.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.

[14]  Z. Yang,et al.  Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analyses. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  W. Taylor,et al.  The classification of amino acid conservation. , 1986, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  C. Luo,et al.  A new method for estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous rates of nucleotide substitution considering the relative likelihood of nucleotide and codon changes. , 1985, Molecular biology and evolution.

[17]  N. Goldman,et al.  A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.

[18]  J. Wakeley,et al.  The excess of transitions among nucleotide substitutions: new methods of estimating transition bias underscore its significance. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  P. D. Sudman,et al.  Phylogenetic relationships among middle American pocket gophers (genus Orthogeomys) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. , 1992, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[20]  Laurence D. Hurst,et al.  A Quantitative Measure of Error Minimization in the Genetic Code , 1999, Journal of Molecular Evolution.