Do you what I say? People reconstruct the syntax of anomalous utterances

ABSTRACT We frequently experience and successfully process anomalous utterances. Here we examine whether people do this by “correcting” syntactic anomalies to yield well-formed representations. In two structural priming experiments, participants’ syntactic choices in picture description were influenced as strongly by previously comprehended anomalous (missing-verb) prime sentences as by well-formed prime sentences. Our results suggest that comprehenders can reconstruct the constituent structure of anomalous utterances – even when such utterances lack a major structural component such as the verb. These results also imply that structural alignment in dialogue is unaffected if one interlocutor produces anomalous utterances.

[1]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Alignment and task success in spoken dialogue , 2014, Journal of Memory and Language.

[2]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The On-Line Effects of Semantic Context on Syntactic Processing , 1977 .

[3]  Roger Levy,et al.  A noisy-channel model of rational human sentence comprehension under uncertain input , 2008, EMNLP 2008.

[4]  M. Pickering,et al.  Structural change and reanalysis difficulty in language comprehension , 1999 .

[5]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  The Contributions of Verb Bias and Plausibility to the Comprehension of Temporarily Ambiguous Sentences , 1997 .

[6]  Mitchell P. Marcus,et al.  Text Chunking using Transformation-Based Learning , 1995, VLC@ACL.

[7]  Holly P. Branigan,et al.  Mapping Concepts to Syntax: Evidence from Structural Priming in Mandarin Chinese. , 2012 .

[8]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[9]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience , 2013, Cognition.

[10]  Benedikt Szmrecsanyi Language users as creatures of habit: A corpus-based analysis of persistence in spoken English , 2005 .

[11]  J. Trueswell,et al.  The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  Karl G. D. Bailey,et al.  Disfluencies and human language comprehension , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Prosodic marking in speech repair , 1983 .

[14]  Franklin Chang,et al.  Do Lemmas Speak German? A Verb Position Effect in German Structural Priming , 2015, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  K. Bock,et al.  From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft. , 1992, Psychological review.

[17]  J. K. Bock Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  M. Pickering,et al.  Alignment in second language dialogue , 2008 .

[19]  Holly P. Branigan,et al.  Lexical and syntactic representations in closely related languages: Evidence from Cantonese–Mandarin bilinguals , 2011 .

[20]  Angeliki Salamoura,et al.  Lexical Activation of Cross-Language Syntactic Priming. , 2006 .

[21]  A. Sanford,et al.  Depth of processing in language comprehension: not noticing the evidence , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  S. Brennan,et al.  Disfluency Rates in Conversation: Effects of Age, Relationship, Topic, Role, and Gender , 2001, Language and speech.

[24]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[25]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[26]  M. A. Britt,et al.  The Interaction of Referential Ambiguity and Argument Structure in the Parsing of Prepositional Phrases , 1994 .

[27]  R. Levy Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.

[28]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[30]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Closed-class immanence in sentence production , 1989, Cognition.

[31]  Patrick Sturt,et al.  Processing verb-phrase ellipsis in Mandarin Chinese: Evidence against the syntactic account , 2013 .

[32]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[33]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Persistence of emphasis in language production: A cross-linguistic approach , 2009, Cognition.

[34]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Taking on semantic commitments: Processing multiple meanings vs. multiple senses ☆ , 1990 .

[35]  V. Ferreira,et al.  To err is human; to structurally prime from errors is also human. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  Franziska Frankfurter,et al.  Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure: Adele E. Goldberg, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1995. xi + 265 pp , 1998 .

[37]  A. Goldberg Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language , 2006 .

[38]  Simon Garrod,et al.  The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension. , 1998 .

[39]  M. Pickering,et al.  The Representation of Verbs: Evidence from Syntactic Priming in Language Production , 1998 .

[40]  M. Pickering,et al.  The independence of syntactic processing in Mandarin: Evidence from structural priming , 2016 .

[41]  Karl G. D. Bailey,et al.  Disfluencies, language comprehension, and Tree Adjoining Grammars , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[42]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations , 2006 .

[43]  P C Wason,et al.  A Verbal Illusion , 1979, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[44]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  The diagnosis and cure of garden paths , 1994 .

[45]  Robert J Hartsuiker,et al.  Shared syntactic representations in bilinguals: Evidence for the role of word-order repetition. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Can thematic roles leave traces of their places? , 2003, Cognition.

[47]  Matthew J. Traxler,et al.  Trends in syntactic parsing: anticipation, Bayesian estimation, and good-enough parsing , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  Gary S Dell,et al.  The P-chain: relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  M. Pickering,et al.  The comprehension of anomalous sentences: Evidence from structural priming , 2012, Cognition.

[50]  A. Samuel Lexical Activation Produces Potent Phonemic Percepts , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[51]  C. Clifton,et al.  The independence of syntactic processing , 1986 .

[52]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[53]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  Antonella Sorace,et al.  Is young children's passive syntax semantically constrained? Evidence from syntactic priming. , 2012 .

[55]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[56]  K. Bock,et al.  Framing sentences , 1990, Cognition.

[57]  M. Garrett,et al.  Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[58]  A. Hollingworth,et al.  Thematic Roles Assigned along the Garden Path Linger , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[59]  M. Pickering,et al.  The activation of inappropriate analyses in garden-path sentences: Evidence from structural priming , 2006 .

[60]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming? , 2010, Cognition.

[61]  Anna Papafragou,et al.  Event Structure Influences Language Production: Evidence from Structural Priming in Motion Event Description. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[62]  M. Pickering,et al.  Structural priming: a critical review. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[63]  Alissa Melinger,et al.  Lexically-driven syntactic priming , 2005, Cognition.

[64]  Stephen B. Barton,et al.  A case study of anomaly detection: Shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[65]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[66]  Christoph Scheepers,et al.  Syntactic priming of relative clause attachments: persistence of structural configuration in sentence production , 2003, Cognition.

[67]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  Syntactic alignment and participant role in dialogue , 2007, Cognition.

[68]  S. Gries Syntactic Priming: A Corpus-based Approach , 2005, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[69]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Long-term structural priming affects subsequent patterns of language production , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[70]  M. Pickering,et al.  How do people produce ungrammatical utterances , 2012 .

[71]  Leon Bergen,et al.  Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[72]  G. Dell,et al.  Becoming syntactic. , 2006, Psychological review.

[73]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[74]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Is long-term structural priming affected by patterns of experience with individual verbs? , 2008, Journal of memory and language.