Kinematic Precise Orbit Determination for Gravity Field Determination

In this paper we first present approaches and results in precise orbit determination (POD) for satellites in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) based on one or two frequency GPS measurements and, secondly, we focus on the relations between kinematic POD and gravity field determination. Using GPS measurements of the CHAMP satellite we show that it is possible to estimate kinematic positions of a LEO satellite with the same level of accuracy (≈ 1–3 cm w.r.t. SLR) as with the widely applied reduced-dynamic or dynamic approaches. Kinematic precise orbit determination (POD) as presented here is based on GPS phase measurements and is independent of satellite dynamics (e.g. gravity field, air-drag, etc.) and orbit characteristics (e.g. orbit height, eccentricity, etc.). We also looked at the LEO POD based on GPS measurements from only one frequency, where we make use of what we call the LP linear combination. We show that with this linear combination LEO POD can be performed with one frequency at the 10 cm level. In the second part of the paper the use of kinematic POD is discussed in the framework of the CHAMP, GRACE and GOCE gravity missions. With simulated GPS measurements we studied the impact of ambiguity resolution for the kinematic baseline between the two GRACE satellites. At the end of the paper we present an alternative approach in gravity field determination by measuring the gravitational frequency shift between (optical) atomic clocks in space. In this approach we require very accurate clocks positions, which may be obtained from kinematic POD.

[1]  Bob E. Schutz,et al.  Precision orbit determination for TOPEX/POSEIDON , 1994 .

[2]  W. G. Melbourne,et al.  GPS precise tracking of TOPEX/POSEIDON: Results and implications , 1994 .

[3]  Pascal Willis,et al.  First assessment of GPS-based reduced dynamic orbit determination on TOPEX/Poseidon , 1994 .

[4]  Willy Bertiger,et al.  Single Frequency GPS Orbit Determination for Low Earth Orbiters , 1996 .

[5]  CHAMP, GRACE and GOCE: Mission concepts and simulations , 1999 .

[6]  P. Uhrich,et al.  Cold atoms in space and atomic clocks: ACES , 2001 .

[7]  T. Hänsch,et al.  Optical frequency metrology , 2002, Nature.

[8]  David D. Rowlands,et al.  Filtering Errors in LEO Trajectories Obtained by Kinematic GPS with Floated Ambiguities , 2002 .

[9]  Markus Rothacher,et al.  Kinematic Orbit Determination of LEOs Based on Zero or Double-difference Algorithms Using Simulated and Real SST GPS Data , 2002 .

[10]  Markus Rothacher,et al.  Kinematic and Reduced-Dynamic Precise Orbit Determination of CHAMP satellite over one year using zero-differences , 2003 .

[11]  Markus Rothacher,et al.  CHAMP double-difference kinematic POD with ambiguity resolution , 2003 .

[12]  M. Rothacher,et al.  Kinematic and reduced-dynamic precise orbit determination of low earth orbiters , 2003 .

[13]  S. H. Byun,et al.  Satellite orbit determination using triple-differenced GPS carrier phase in pure kinematic mode , 2003 .

[14]  J. Lemoine,et al.  The CHAMP-only earth gravity field model EIGEN-2 , 2003 .

[15]  Heike Bock,et al.  Efficient methods for determining precise orbits of low Earth orbiters using the Global Positioning System , 2003 .

[16]  P. Steigenberger,et al.  A CHAMP‐only gravity field model from kinematic orbits using the energy integral , 2003 .