Bio-energy in Europe: changing technology choices

Abstract Bio-energy is seen as one of the key options to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and substitute fossil fuels. This is certainly evident in Europe, where a kaleidoscope of activities and programs was and is executed for developing and stimulating bio-energy. Over the past 10–15 years in the European Union, heat and electricity production from biomass increased with some 2% and 9% per year, respectively, between 1990 and 2000 and biofuel production increased about eight-fold in the same period. Biomass contributed some two-thirds of the total renewable energy production in the European Union (EU) (2000 PJ) or 4% of the total energy supply in 1999. Given the targets for heat, power and biofuels, this contribution may rise to some 10% (6000 PJ) in 2010. Over time, the scale at which bio-energy is being used has increased considerably. This is true for electricity and combined heat and power plants, and how biomass markets are developing from purely regional to international markets, with increasing cross-border trade-flows. So far, national policy programs proved to be of vital importance for the success of the development of bio-energy, which led to very specific technological choices in various countries. For the future, a supra-national approach is desired: comprehensive research development, demonstration & deployment trajectories for key options as biomass integrated gasification/combined cycle and advanced biofuel concepts, develop an international biomass market allowing for international trade and an integral policy approach for bio-energy incorporating energy, agricultural, forestry, waste and industrial policies. The Common Agricultural Policy of the (extended) EU should fully incorporate bio-energy and perennial crops in particular.

[1]  A. Faaij,et al.  Exploration of the possibilities for production of Fischer Tropsch liquids and power via biomass gasification , 2002 .

[2]  T. Elliott,et al.  Brazilian biomass power demonstration project , 1994 .

[3]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Global energy : perspectives , 1998 .

[4]  P. Börjesson.  Environmental effects of energy crop cultivation in Sweden—I: Identification and quantification , 1999 .

[5]  Stefano Consonni,et al.  Biomass-gasifier/aeroderivative gas turbine combined cycles - Part A : Technologies and performance modeling , 1994 .

[6]  André Faaij,et al.  Biomass combustion for power generation , 1996 .

[7]  R. Oloruntoba,et al.  Public Policy and Biofuels: The Way Forward? , 2007 .

[8]  Copernicus Copernicus,et al.  Future prospects for production of methanol and hydrogen from biomass , 2001 .

[9]  L. Beurskens,et al.  An overview of biofuel technologies, markets and policies in Europe , 2003 .

[10]  Kees W. Kwant,et al.  Renewable energy in The Netherlands: policy and instruments , 2003 .

[11]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Technological learning in bioenergy systems , 2006 .

[12]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Gasification of biomass wastes and residues for electricity production. , 1995 .

[13]  Eric D. Larson,et al.  Biomass gasifier gas turbine power generating technology , 1996 .

[14]  Nicholas P. Cheremisinoff,et al.  Wood for energy production , 1980 .

[15]  Stefano Consonni,et al.  Biomass-Gasifier/Aeroderivative Gas Turbine Combined Cycles: Part B—Performance Calculations and Economic Assessment , 1994 .

[16]  R. H. Williams.  Methanol and hydrogen from biomass for transportation with comparisons to methanol and hydrogen from natural gas and coal , 1997 .

[17]  R. L. Bain,et al.  Ethanol and methanol from cellulosic biomass , 1993 .

[18]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Exploration of the ranges of the global potential of biomass for energy , 2003 .

[19]  Arnaldo Walter,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of co-fired biomass integrated gasification/combined cycle systems with inclusion of economies of scale , 2003 .

[20]  Lee R. Lynd,et al.  Overview and evaluation of fuel ethanol from cellulosic biomass , 1996 .

[21]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  The influence of perceived uncertainty on entrepreneurial action in emerging renewable energy technology; biomass gasification projects in the Netherlands , 2007 .

[22]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Optimization of the final waste treatment system in the Netherlands , 1998 .

[23]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Energy supply mitigation options , 1996 .

[24]  Manuel Frondel,et al.  Biodiesel: A New Oildorado? , 2005 .

[25]  R.W.J Konffeld,et al.  Sustainability of biomass electricity systems: an assessment of costs, macro-economic and environmental impacts in Nicaragua, Ireland and The Netherlands , 2001 .

[26]  André Faaij,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS AND AVAILABILITY OF BIOMASS WASTE AND RESIDUES IN THE NETHERLANDS FOR GASIFICATION , 1997 .

[27]  MICHAEL B. Jones,et al.  Current and future financial competitiveness of electricity and heat from energy crops: A case study from Ireland , 2007 .

[28]  Jeremy Woods,et al.  Biomass for energy: supply prospects. , 1993 .

[29]  I. B. Fridleifsson,et al.  Renewable Energy Technologies , 2000 .

[30]  T. Bridgwater.  Biomass for energy , 2006 .

[31]  H. E. Stassen.  Small-Scale Biomass Gasifiers for Heat and Power: A Global Review , 1995 .

[32]  Joan M. Ogden,et al.  A comparison of hydrogen, methanol and gasoline as fuels for fuel cell vehicles: implications for vehicle design and infrastructure development , 1999 .

[33]  Bengt Hillring,et al.  Rural development and bioenergy—experiences from 20years of development in Sweden , 2002 .