Evaluating the impact of population bottlenecks in experimental evolution.

Experimental evolution involves severe, periodic reductions in population size when fresh media are inoculated during serial transfer. These bottlenecks affect the dynamics of evolution, reducing the probability that a beneficial mutation will reach fixation. We quantify the impact of these bottlenecks on the evolutionary dynamics, for populations that grow exponentially between transfers and for populations in which growth is curbed by a resource-limited environment. We find that in both cases, mutations that survive bottlenecks are equally likely to occur, per unit time, at all times during the growth phase. We estimate the total fraction of beneficial mutations that are lost due to bottlenecks during experimental evolution protocols and derive the "optimal" dilution ratio, the ratio that maximizes the number of surviving beneficial mutations. Although more severe dilution ratios are often used in the literature, we find that a ratio of 0.1-0.2 minimizes the chances that rare beneficial mutations are lost. Finally, we provide a number of useful approximate results and illustrate our approach with applications to experimental evolution protocols in the literature.

[1]  E. Pollak.  Fixation probabilities when the population size undergoes cyclic fluctuations. , 2000, Theoretical population biology.

[2]  S. Wright.  Evolution in mendelian populations , 1931 .

[3]  L. Chao,et al.  Evolution by small steps and rugged landscapes in the RNA virus phi6. , 1999, Genetics.

[4]  W J Ewens,et al.  The probability of survival of a new mutant in a fluctuating environment , 1967, Heredity.

[5]  B. Levin,et al.  Compensatory mutations, antibiotic resistance and the population genetics of adaptive evolution in bacteria. , 2000, Genetics.

[6]  J. Bull,et al.  Different trajectories of parallel evolution during viral adaptation. , 1999, Science.

[7]  M. Kimura.  A PROBABILITY METHOD FOR TREATING INBREEDING SYSTEMS, ESPECIALLY WITH LINKED GENES , 1963 .

[8]  J. Bull,et al.  Big-benefit mutations in a bacteriophage inhibited with heat. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[9]  Michael Travisano,et al.  Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment , 1998, Nature.

[10]  J. Bull,et al.  Exceptional convergent evolution in a virus. , 1997, Genetics.

[11]  R. Lenski,et al.  Dynamics of adaptation and diversification: a 10,000-generation experiment with bacterial populations. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  R. Lenski,et al.  The fate of competing beneficial mutations in an asexual population , 2004, Genetica.

[13]  Mandy J. Haldane,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection, Part V: Selection and Mutation , 1927, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[14]  M. Kimura,et al.  An introduction to population genetics theory , 1971 .

[15]  Bruce R. Levin,et al.  Partitioning of Resources and the Outcome of Interspecific Competition: A Model and Some General Considerations , 1973, The American Naturalist.

[16]  R. Lenski,et al.  Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli , 1997, Nature.

[17]  J. B. S. Haldane,et al.  A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection—I , 1927, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[18]  M. Kimura,et al.  On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. , 1962, Genetics.

[19]  W Arber,et al.  Genomic evolution during a 10,000-generation experiment with bacteria. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  S. Wright,et al.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations. , 1931, Genetics.

[21]  L. Wahl,et al.  The effects of genetic drift in experimental evolution. , 2002, Theoretical population biology.

[22]  R. Rosenzweig,et al.  Microbial evolution in a simple unstructured environment: genetic differentiation in Escherichia coli. , 1994, Genetics.

[23]  R. Lenski,et al.  Long-Term Experimental Evolution in Escherichia coli. I. Adaptation and Divergence During 2,000 Generations , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[24]  G. Bell,et al.  Experimental evolution in Chlamydomonas II. Genetic variation in strongly contrasted environments , 1997, Heredity.

[25]  S. Schrag,et al.  Reducing antibiotic resistance , 1996, Nature.

[26]  T. Appenzeller.  Test Tube Evolution Catches Time in a Bottle , 1999, Science.

[27]  Motoo Kimura,et al.  Some Problems of Stochastic Processes in Genetics , 1957 .

[28]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  On the dominance ratio , 1990 .

[29]  D. Krakauer,et al.  Models of experimental evolution: the role of genetic chance and selective necessity. , 2000, Genetics.

[30]  M. Whitlock,et al.  The probability of fixation in populations of changing size. , 1997, Genetics.

[31]  J. Adams,et al.  Repeated evolution of an acetate-crossfeeding polymorphism in long-term populations of Escherichia coli. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.

[32]  THE PROBABILITY THAT BENEFICIAL MUTATIONS ARE LOST IN POPULATIONS WITH PERIODIC BOTTLENECKS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[33]  M. Kimura.  Population Genetics, Molecular Evolution, and the Neutral Theory: Selected Papers , 1995 .