Partition Dependence and Carryover Biases in Subjective Probability Assessment Surveys for Continuous Variables: Model-Based Estimation and Correction

As probability elicitation becomes widely used, methods other than one-on-one interviews are being used to elicit expert probabilities. This paper considers biases that may arise when probabilities are elicited in an online or workbook setting. We develop a prescriptive model in which the elicited probability is a convex combination of the expert’s underlying probability with elements of partition dependence and two anchors arising from responses to previous questions (“carryover” bias). Our model, applied to two data sets, allows us to estimate the amount of the various biases in a set of elicited probabilities from experts. We find that both the format of the questions—whether they appear on the same or separate pages/screens—and the ordering of the questions can affect the amount of bias. Our research addresses biases in the presence of multiple anchors and provides guidance on manipulating the availability of anchors. The results demonstrate the persistence of anchoring even with careful questionnaire design; thus, the proposed model-based methods are useful to suggest corrections for the resulting biases.

[1]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[2]  D. W. Bunn,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to the Linear Combination of Forecasts , 1975 .

[3]  Derek W. Bunn,et al.  Anchoring Bias in the Assessment of Subjective Probability , 1975 .

[4]  Carl-Axel S. Staël von Holstein,et al.  Exceptional Paper---Probability Encoding in Decision Analysis , 1975 .

[5]  Derek W. Bunn,et al.  Estimation of subjective probability distributions in forecasting and decision making , 1979 .

[6]  M. J. Allen Introduction to Measurement Theory , 1979 .

[7]  M. W. Merkhofer,et al.  Quantifying judgmental uncertainty: Methodology, experiences, and insights , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[8]  D. Ruppert,et al.  Transformation and Weighting in Regression , 1988 .

[9]  William F. Wright,et al.  Effects of situation familiarity and financial incentives on use of the anchoring and adjustment heuristic for probability assessment , 1989 .

[10]  Max Henrion,et al.  Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[11]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Eliciting probabilities from experts in complex technical problems , 1991 .

[12]  R. Cooke Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science , 1991 .

[13]  Janet A. Sniezek,et al.  Judgment processes in motivation: Anchoring and adjustment effects on judgment and behavior. , 1991 .

[14]  T. Modis,et al.  Experts in uncertainty , 1993 .

[15]  A. Tversky,et al.  Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. , 1994 .

[16]  M. Teisl,et al.  Test-Retest Reliability of Contingent Valuation with Independent Sample Pretest and Posttest Control Groups , 1995 .

[17]  Bente Halvorsen Ordering effects in contingent valuation surveys , 1996 .

[18]  A. Tversky,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: Unpacking, Repacking, and Anchoring: Advances in Support Theory , 2002 .

[19]  Glen Whyte,et al.  The Effect of Multiple Anchors on Anchoring in Individual and Group Judgment , 1997 .

[20]  A. Tversky,et al.  Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: advances in support theory. , 1997 .

[21]  Anthony O'Hagan,et al.  Eliciting expert beliefs in substantial practical applications , 1998 .

[22]  Jane M. Booker,et al.  Eliciting and analyzing expert judgement - a practical guide , 2001, ASA-SIAM series on statistics and applied probability.

[23]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment , 2002 .

[24]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Using a Bayesian Approach to Quantify Scale Compatibility Bias , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[25]  J. Charles Kerkering,et al.  Eliciting and Analyzing Expert Judgment, A Practical Guide , 2002, Technometrics.

[26]  P. Shackley,et al.  Do ordering effects matter in willingness-to-pay studies of health care? , 2002, Journal of health economics.

[27]  Craig R. Fox,et al.  Partition Priming in Judgment Under Uncertainty , 2003, Psychological science.

[28]  Robert T. Clemen,et al.  Subjective Probability Assessment in Decision Analysis: Partition Dependence and Bias Toward the Ignorance Prior , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[29]  Mickael Bech,et al.  Ordering effect and price sensitivity in discrete choice experiments: need we worry? , 2006, Health economics.

[30]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Quantifying and Mitigating the Splitting Bias and Other Value Tree-Induced Weighting Biases , 2007, Decis. Anal..

[31]  Robert T. Clemen,et al.  Improving and Measuring the Effectiveness of Decision Analysis: Linking Decision Analysis and Behavioral Decision Research , 2008 .

[32]  Robert T. Clemen,et al.  Interior Additivity and Subjective Probability Assessment of Continuous Variables , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[33]  The effect of multiple anchors on the distribution of responses , 2010 .

[34]  David Ruppert,et al.  Transformation and Weighting , 2014 .