An Investigation of Particle Swarm Optimization Topologies in Structural Damage Detection

In the past few decades, vibration-based structural damage detection (SDD) has attracted widespread attention. Using the response data of engineering structures, the researchers have developed many methods for damage localization and quantification. Adopting meta-heuristic algorithms, in which particle swarm optimization (PSO) is the most widely used, is a popular approach. Various PSO variants have also been proposed for improving its performance in SDD, and they are generally based on the Global topology. However, in addition to the Global topology, other topologies are also developed in the related literature to enhance the performance of the PSO algorithm. The effects of PSO topologies depend significantly on the studied problems. Therefore, in this article, we conduct a performance investigation of eight PSO topologies in SDD. The success rate and mean iterations that are obtained from the numerical simulations are considered as the evaluation indexes. Furthermore, the average rank and Bonferroni-Dunn’s test are further utilized to perform the statistic analysis. From these analysis results, the Four Clusters are shown to be the more favorable PSO topologies in SDD.

[1]  Zhongqing Su,et al.  A Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)-Simplex Algorithm for Damage Identification of Delaminated Beams , 2012 .

[2]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A practical tutorial on the use of nonparametric statistical tests as a methodology for comparing evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms , 2011, Swarm Evol. Comput..

[3]  Jean Charles Gilbert,et al.  Numerical Optimization: Theoretical and Practical Aspects , 2003 .

[4]  Aiping Qu,et al.  Some sufficient descent conjugate gradient methods and their global convergence , 2014 .

[5]  Ling Yu,et al.  A hybrid self-adaptive Firefly-Nelder-Mead algorithm for structural damage detection , 2016 .

[6]  Mahmoud R. Maheri,et al.  Multi-stage approach for structural damage detection problem using basis pursuit and particle swarm optimization , 2016 .

[7]  S. R. Hoseini Vaez,et al.  Damage Detection of Thin Plates Using GA-PSO Algorithm Based on Modal Data , 2017 .

[8]  Y. Rahmat-Samii,et al.  Boundary Conditions in Particle Swarm Optimization Revisited , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[9]  S. M. Seyedpoor A two stage method for structural damage detection using a modal strain energy based index and particle swarm optimization , 2012 .

[10]  Roger Serra,et al.  A Novel VBSHM Strategy to Identify Geometrical Damage Properties Using Only Frequency Changes and Damage Library , 2020 .

[11]  Ling Yu,et al.  A new structural damage detection strategy of hybrid PSO with Monte Carlo simulations and experimental verifications , 2018, Measurement.

[12]  Janez Demsar,et al.  Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[13]  Zhigang Lu,et al.  An Event-Based Supply Chain Partnership Integration Using a Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization and Ant Colony Optimization Approach , 2019, Applied Sciences.

[14]  Hesheng Tang,et al.  Multi-stage approach for structural damage identification using particle swarm optimization , 2013 .

[15]  S. M. Seyedpoor,et al.  Structural damage detection using an efficient correlation-based index and a modified genetic algorithm , 2011, Math. Comput. Model..

[16]  Roger Serra,et al.  Performance of Fitness Functions Based on Natural Frequencies in Defect Detection Using the Standard PSO-FEM Approach , 2021 .

[17]  Najeh Ben Guedria,et al.  Improved accelerated PSO algorithm for mechanical engineering optimization problems , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[18]  Amitava Chatterjee,et al.  A new social and momentum component adaptive PSO algorithm for image segmentation , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).